Students’ Errors in E-Learning Discussion in TEFL Course and Their Responses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v5i3.52718Keywords:
error analysis, asynchronous, online, discussion, TEFLAbstract
Lack of knowledge, practice, and forgetfulness can also contribute to typographical errors. Writing errors will impact the information presented and cannot be appropriately channeled. This research aims to analyze the types of mistakes made by students using English and identify their responses to the errors made. This type of research is qualitative. The research method is a qualitative descriptive method. The sample was determined purposively, namely students in class 3A who were categorized as having superior English skills among other classes. The methods used in collecting data are observation and interviews. The instrument used is a questionnaire sheet. The data analysis technique used is qualitative and quantitative analysis. The study's results proved that there were 7554 errors from 1875 conversations. 3332 (44.11%) lexical errors, 474 (6.27%) grammatical errors, and 419 (5.54%) spelling errors. Additional findings include grammar or mechanics errors, as much as 3329. (44%). Student responses varied towards the mistakes made, including limited knowledge, forgetting English grammar concepts, accustomed to thinking in the native language (mother tongue) or translating, lack of using tenses in everyday life, the assumption that one does not need to master grammar, and limited time and rush in writing answers, as well as lack of accuracy.
References
Alharbi, A. T. (2022). Grammatical awareness and language performance: examining gendered differences among Saudi EFL (English as a foreign language (Vol. 11, Issue 625). https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109455.1).
Atmaca, Ÿ. (2016). Error Analysis of Turkish EFL Learners: A Case Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 234–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.007.
Atmowardoyo, H. (2018). Research methods in TEFL studies: Descriptive research, case study, error analysis, and R & D. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(1), 197–204. http://academypublication.com/issues2/jltr/vol09/01/25.pdf.
Aziz, A., Darwis, M., & Abbas, A. (2022). Error Analysis of Indonesian Speaker and Presenter for Practice of Public Speaking Class. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(1), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i1.19995.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
Calderon, S. S., & Plaza, M. P. (2021). The impact of error analysis and feedback in English second language learning. English Literature and Language Review, 7(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.32861/ellr.71.5.14.
Castellano-Risco, I., Alejo-González, R., & Piquer-Píriz, A. M. (2020). The development of receptive vocabulary in CLIL vs EFL: Is the learning context the main variable? System, 91, 102263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102263.
Chitamba, H. M. . (2014). Technology and its effect in our daily lives. Vaal of Technology, 2(1), 2–9. https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/EJC137207.
Dewi, F. S., & Huda, M. C. (2020). An Analysis of Students ’ Errors in Writing Descriptive Text at Tenth Grade of SMAN 1 Tulungagung in Academic Year 2018 / 2019. A Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 3(1), 11–20. https://www.academia.edu/download/87227928/1544-3105-2-PB.pdf.
Durbahn, M., Rodgers, M., & Peters, E. (2020). The relationship between vocabulary and viewing comprehension. System, 88, 102166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102166.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Elyas, A. H. (2018). Penggunaan model pembelajaran e-learning dalam meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran. Jurnal Warta, 56(04), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i56.4.
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4.
Fitriyani, Y., Fauzi, I., & Sari, M. Z. (2020). Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Pembelajaran Daring Selama Pandemik Covid-19. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 7(3), 511–519. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v6i2.2654.
Fuadi, T. M., Musriandi, R., & Suryani, L. (2020). Covid-19: Penerapan Pembelajaran Daring di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan, 4(2), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.30601/dedikasi.v4i2.1022.
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition. An introductory course (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Ha, X. Van, Nguyen, L. T., & Hung, B. P. (2021). Oral corrective feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms: A teaching and learning perspective. Heliyon, 7(7), e07550. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07550.
Hsu, W. (2014). Measuring the vocabulary load of engineering textbooks for EFL undergraduates. English for Specific Purposes, 33(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.07.001.
Hu, T.-C., Sung, Y.-T., Liang, H.-H., Chang, T.-J., & Chou, Y.-T. (2022). Relative Roles of Grammar Knowledge and Vocabulary in the Reading Comprehension of EFL Elementary-School Learners: Direct, Mediating, and Form/Meaning-Distinct Effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 827007. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827007.
Islamiyah, M., & Fajri, M. S. Al. (2019). Error Analysis and Its Implications for the English Classroom : A Case Study of an Advanced English Learner. Indonesian EFL Journal: Journal of ELT, Linguistics, and Literature, 5(2), 1–13. http://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/mataraman/index.php/efi/article/view/3736.
James, C. (2013). Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. Taylor & Francis.
Janebi Enayat, M., & Derakhshan, A. (2021). Vocabulary size and depth as predictors of second language speaking ability. System, 99, 102521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102521.
Kharmilah, P., & Narius, D. (2019). Error Analysis in Writing Discussion Text Made by Students at English Department of Universitas Negeri Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(3), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v8i3.105228.
Lin, V., Yeh, H.-C., Huang, H.-H., & Chen, N.-S. (2022). Enhancing EFL vocabulary learning with multimodal cues supported by an educational robot and an IoT-Based 3D book. System, 104, 102691. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102691.
Mashoor, B. N., & Abdullah, A. T. H. (2020). Error Analysis of Spoken English Language among Jordanian Secondary School Students. International Journal of Education and Research, 8(5), 75–82. http://www.ijern.com/journal/2020/May-2020/07.pdf.
Muhsin, M. A. (2016). Analysing the students errors in using simple present (A case study at Junior High School in Makassar). Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 81–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psrb.2016.09.006.
Mustadi, A., & Amalia, M. (2020). Spelling Writing Error Analysis in Nonfiction Essay of Elementary Students. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 8(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v8i2.33436.
Nadya, M., & Muthalib, K. A. (2021). Error Analysis of the Students’ English Written Descriptive Text. English Education Journal, 12(2), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v12i2.19552.
Nazari, M., Boustani, A., & Sheikhi, M. (2022). A case study of the impact of a teacher education course on two Iranian EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices about grammar teaching. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00142-9.
Pasaribu, A. N. (2021). A Common Error Analysis in Students’ English Narrative Writing. English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 4(2), 436–445. https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v4i2.2338.
Permatasari, A. (2020). Analyzing Factors that Affect Rice Import Volume in Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 11(10), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.7176/jesd/11-10-01.
Permatasari, A. D., Wijayatiningsih, T. D., & Mulyadi, D. (2018). Error Analysis on EFL Learners’ Analytical Exposition Writing. Surakarta English and Literature Journal, 1(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.52429/selju.v1i1.204.
Saputra, I. P. W. A., Tantra, D. K., & Ratminingsih, N. M. (2014). An analysis of errors on writing of the eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Abiansemal. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Indonesia, 2(1), 2615–4404. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v2i1.1429.
Setiyorini, T. J., Dewi, P., & Masykuri, E. S. (2020). The Grammatical Error Analysis Found in Students’ Composition. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, Dan Budaya, 10(2), 218–223. https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.10.2.2020.218-233.
Yani, K. K. (2022). Students’ Error in Writing Descriptive Text in The Junior High School Viewed from Its Indicators. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 9(3), 249. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v9i3.43351.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ni Made Ratminingsih, Made Hery Santosa, I Ketut Trika Adi Ana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review (IJERR) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)