THE EFFECT OF FLIPPED LEARNING 3.0 AND SELF-REGULATED LEARNING ON TWELFTH GRADE STUDENTS SPEAKING PERFORMANCE

Authors

  • Agung Krsna Lila Dasa Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Luh Diah Surya Adnyani Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Luh Gd. Rahayu Budiarta Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/ijll.v5i1.27693

Keywords:

Flipped Learning 3.0, Self-regulated Learning, Speaking Performance

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of flipped learning (FL) 3.0 and self-regulated learning (SRL) on the speaking performance of twelfth-grade students in Buleleng. This study was experimental study that focused on Quasi-Experimental design. The sample was 63 students that classified into the control and experimental class through random sampling to the intact groups. Data were collected from the speaking performance score and questionnaires. The results showed that significant difference of students speaking performance taught by FL 3.0 and conventional method was 0.048, means that it was significant. Students' speaking performance difference who has low and high SRL was 0.568, means that it was not significant. The interaction effect of FL 3.0 and SRL was 0.790, means that they had no interaction effect. FL 3.0 could be used in teaching speaking because it had significant effect on students' speaking performance even though the students have high or low SRL.

References

Amiryousefi, M. (2019). The Incorporation of Flipped Learning Into Conventional Classes to Enhance EFL learners ’ L2 Speaking , L2 Listening , and Engagement. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching ISSN:, 1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1394307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1394307

Antonio, V., Núñez Carlos, J., Cabanach, R. G., González-pienda, J. A., Rodríguez, S., Rosário, P., … Muñoz-cadavid, M. A. (2008). Self-regulated Profiles and Academic Achievement. Psicothema, 20, 724–731.

Arianti, N. M. M. (2017). The Identification of Self-regulated Learning Implemented By The Students of Senior High School in Bulelelng Sub-district.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day.

Evseeva, A., & Solozhenko, A. (2015). Use of Flipped Classroom Technology in Language Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206(November), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.006

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate research in Education.

Kızıl, A. Ş., & Savran, Z. (2018). Assessing self-regulated learning : The case of vocabulary learning through information and communication technologies. Computer Assisted Language Learning ISSN:, 8221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1428201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t76660-000

Li, S., & Suwanthep, J. (2017). Integration of Flipped Classroom Model for EFL Speaking. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 118–123. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.3.2.118-123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.3.2.118-123

Mennella, T. (n.d.). Combining Teaching Strategies to Unlock New Possibilities.

Paivi Virtanen, Anne Nevgi, H. N. (2013). Self-regulation in Higher Education: Students’ Motivational, and Learning Strategies, and Their Relationships to Study Success. Studies for the Learning Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/sls-2013-0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sls-2013-0004

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Handbook of Self-Regulation. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Sarasyifa, M. (2018). Applying Flipped Classroom Model to Enhance Students’ Speaking Skill. Faculty of Educational Sciences.

Shyamlee, S. D. (2012). “ Use of Technology in English Language Teaching and Learning ”: An Analysis . 2012 International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture, 33, 150–156.

Singh, H., Jaswant, S., Singh, C. K. S., Mohtar, T. M. T., & Mostafa, N. A. (2017). A Review of Research on Flipped Classroom Approach for Teaching Communication Skills in English. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i10/3362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i10/3362

Tsai, C., Shen, P., & Fan, Y. (2013). Research trends in self-regulated learning research in online learning environments: A review of studies published in selected journals from 2003 to 2012

Chia-Wen Tsai, Pei-Di Shen and Ya-Ting Fan. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12017

Wolters, C. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Assessing Academic Self-regulated Learning, 2003(March).

Xu, Z., & Shi, Y. (2018). Application of Constructivist Theory in Flipped Classroom — Take College English Teaching as a Case Study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(7), 880–887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0807.21

Downloads

Published

2021-04-15

How to Cite

Dasa, A. K. L., Adnyani, L. D. S., & Budiarta, L. G. R. (2021). THE EFFECT OF FLIPPED LEARNING 3.0 AND SELF-REGULATED LEARNING ON TWELFTH GRADE STUDENTS SPEAKING PERFORMANCE. International Journal of Language and Literature, 5(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijll.v5i1.27693

Issue

Section

Articles