Development of Fourth Industry Oriented Mechanical Engineering Mechatronics Learning Devices 4.0

Authors

  • Hefri Hamid Departement of Engineering Faculty Padang State University, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Nizwardi Jalinus Departement of Engineering Faculty Padang State University, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Azwar Inra Departement of Engineering Faculty Padang State University, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Ambiyar Ambiyar Departement of Engineering Faculty Padang State University, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Waskito Waskito Departement of Engineering Faculty Padang State University, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Sukardi Sukardi Departement of Engineering Faculty Padang State University, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Niny Herlin Department of Physic Faculty Indonesia University, Jakarta, West Jawa, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v3i4.23204

Keywords:

Development of learning devices, Mechatronics, IDI Model, Modern Industrial Work Ability

Abstract

The ability of modern industrial work must be mastered by vocational engineering students, therefore it is important to develop learning tools that are oriented to the fourth industry. This study assesses the development of mechatronics learning tools that are arranged based on the abilities that must be possessed by students to work in the fourth industrial era using the IDI model. Data was collected from the validity, practicality and effectiveness tests on the programmed subjects in 2019. Learning activities carried out during 16 meetings to produce a smart factory (prototype). Analysis shows that learning tools are developedit is valid, then the response of teaching staff shows the criteria are very practical and based on the response of students also in the category of very practical. The findings, an increase in students' understanding of the value of the end of the semester, but they have to struggle even more to obtain more optimal results. Besides, the learning device also forms the general ability of the learner, the learning communicative, collaborative, innovative, creative, leadership and entrepreneurship that observed during the process of learning to walk

References

Abele, E., Chryssolouris, G., Sihn, W., Metternicha. J, ElMaraghy, H., Seliger, G., Sivardf, G., ElMaraghy, W., Hummelg, V., Tischa M., & Seifermanna, S. (2017). Learning factories for future oriented research and education in manufacturing. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology 66, 803-826. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.cirp.2017.05.005

Abuatiq, A., PhD, RN. (2019). Development Tools for Evaluating Virtual Patient Learning Systems. Teaching and Learning in Nursing 14, 291-297. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2019.06.010

Awad, A., Al-Haqan, A., & Moreau, P. (2016). Motivations, career aspirations, and learning experiences of students in the pharmacy program at Kuwait University: A tool to guide curriculum development. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2016.11.018

Al-Mamun, Md.A., Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2020). Instructional design of scaffolded online learning modules for self directed and inquiry-based learning environments. Computers & Education 144, 103695. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103695

Andresen, A., Bruneo, TM, & Nielsen, K. (2019). Engineering Education in Changeable and Reconfigurable Manufacturing: Using Problem-Based Learning in a Learning Factory Environment. 52 nd CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Procedia CIRP 81, 7-12. do i: 10.1016 / j.procir.2019.03.002

Balve, P., & Eberta, L. (2019). Ex Post Evaluation of a Learning Factory-Competence Development Based on Graduates Feedback. 9th Conference on Learning Factories, Procedia Manufacturing 31 8–13. doi: 10.1016 / j.promfg.2019.03.002

Berndtsson, I., Dahlborg, E., & Pennbrant, S. (2020). Work-integrated learning as a pedagogical tool to integrate theory and practice in nursing education - An integrative literature review. Nurse Education in Practice 42, 102685. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102685

Büchi, G., Cugno, M., & Castagnoli, R. (2020). Smart factory performance and Industry 4.0. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 150, 119790. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119790

Choi, SJ, Jeong, JC, & Kim, SN (2019). Impact of vocational education and training on adult skills and employment: An applied multilevel analysis. International Journal of Educational Development 66, 129-138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.09.007

Elbestawi, M., Centea, D., Singha, I., & Wanyamaa, T. (2018). SEPT Learning Factory for Industry 4.0 Education and Applied Research. 8th Conference on Learning Factories-Advanced Engineering Education & Training for Manufacturing Innovation, Procedia Manufacturing 23, 249-254. doi: 10.1016 / j.promfg.2018.04.025

Enke, J., Glass, R., Kre, A., Hambach, J., Tisch, M., & Metternicha, J. (2018). Industrie 4.0 - Competencies for a modern production system A curriculum for Learning Factories. 8th Conference on Learning Factories-Advanced Engineering Education & Training for Manufacturing Innovation, Procedia Manufacturing 23, 267-272. doi: 10.1016 / j.promfg.2018.04.028

Ghobakhloo, M. (2019). Industry 4.0, Digitization, and Opportunities for Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production S0959-6526 (19) 34739-0. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119869

Gustafson, KL, & Branch, RM, (1997). Survey of Instructional Development Model, Third Edition. ERIC Clearinghouse On Information And Technology, Syracuse NY. Washington, DC. ISBN 0-937597-43- 0

Hill, R., Woodward, M., & Arthur, A. (2020). Collaborative Learning in Practice (CLIP): Evaluation of a new approach to clinical learning. Nurse Education Today 85. 104295. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104295

Inkermann, D., Schneider, D., Martin, NL., Lembeck, H., Zhang, J., & Thiede, S., (2019). A framework to classify Industry 4.0 technologies across production and product development. 29th CIRP Design, Procedia CIRP 84, 973-978. doi: 10.1016 / j.procir.2019.04.218

Karimi, M., & Dowlatabadi, HR (2014). Authenticity vs. Practicality: Metacognitive Awareness through Authentic materials in EFL classroom. International Conference on Current Trends in ELT, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98, 844-851. doi: 10.1016 / j.sbspro.2014.03.490

Keinänen, M., Ursin, J., & Nissinen, K. (2018). How to measure students' innovation competences in higher education: Evaluation of an assessment tool in authentic learning environments. Studies in Educational Evaluation 58, 30-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.007

Klimova, BF (2014). Evaluation methods as an effective tool for the development of students' learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 152, 112-115. doi: 10.1016 / j.sbspro.2014.09.165

Lam, R., Muldner, K. (2017). Manipulating cognitive engagement in preparation-to-collaborate tasks and the effects on learning. Learning and Instruction 1-12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.05.002

Martín-Rojas, R., Garrido-Moreno, A., & García-Morales VJ (2019). Fostering Corporate Entrepreneurship with the use of social media tools. Journal of Business Research (Retrieved December 27, 2019 from), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.072

Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2019). The Teaching Factory Network: A new collaborative paradigm for manufacturing education. 9th Conference on Learning Factories, Procedia Manufacturing 31, 398-403. doi: 10.1016 / j.promfg.2019.03.062

Mention, A., Barlatier., & Josserande, E. (2019). Using social media to leverage and develop dynamic capabilities for innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 144, 242-250. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.03.003

Morris, N., Swinnerton, B., & Coop, T. (2019). Lecture recordings to support learning: A contested space between students and teachers. Computers & Education 140, 103604. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103604

Müller-Frommeyer, LC, Aymans, SC, Bargmann, C., Kauffeld, S., & Herrmann, C. (2017). Introducing competency models as a tool for holistic competency development in learning factories: Challenges, examples and future applications. Procedia Manufacturing , 9, 307-314. doi: 10.1016 / j.promfg.2017.04.015

Pehrson, C., Banerjee, SC, Manna, R., Shen, MJ, Hammonds, S., Coyle, N., Krueger, CA, Maloney, E., Zaider, T., Bylund, CL (2016). Responding empathically to patients: Development, implementation, and evaluation of a communication skills training module for oncology nurses. Patient educational and counseling 99, 610-616. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.021

Rahman, A., Hanafi, N., Mukhtar, M., & Ahmad, J. (2014). Assessment of Practices for Competency Based Education and Training in Vocational College, Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science 112, 1070-1076. doi: 10.1016 / j.sbspro.2014.01.1271

Rauch, E., Morandell, F., & Matt Dominik T. (2019). AD Design Guidelines for Implementing I4.0 Learning Factories. 9th Conference on Learning Factories, Procedia Manufacturing 31, 239-244 . doi: 10.1016 / j.promfg.2019.03.038

Reed, SJ, DNP, APRN. (2011). Debrieffing Experience Scale: Development of a Tool to Evaluate the Student Learning Experience in Debrieving. Clinical Simulation in Nursing , 8, (6), 211-217. doi: 10.1016 / j.ecns.2011.11.002

Reining, N., Kauffeld, S., & Christoph, H. (2019). Students' interactions: Using video data as a mean to identify competences Addressed in learning factories. 9th Conference on Learning Factories, Procedia Manufacturing 31, 1-7. doi: 10.1016 / j.promfg.2019.03.001

Richardson, C., & Mishra, P. (2017). Learning Environments that Support Student Creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity S1871-1871 (17) 30019-6, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.004.

Rust, C., Gentry, WM, & Ford, H. (2019). Assessment of the e ect of communication skills training on communication apprehension in first year pharmacy students - A two-year study. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, (Retrieved December 27, 2019 from), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2019.11.007

Sallati, C., Bertazzi, Jd.A., & Schützer, K. (2019). Professional skills in the Product Development Process: the contribution of learning environments to professional skills in the Industry 4.0 scenario. 29th CIRP Design, Procedia CIRP 84, 203-208. doi: 10.1016 / j.procir.2019.03.214

Schallock, B., Christoffer, R., Roland, J., & Holger, K. (2018). Learning Factory for Industry 4.0 to provide future skills beyond technical training. 8th Conference on Learning Factories-Advanced Engineering Education & Training for Manufacturing Innovation, Procedia Manufacturing 23 27-32. doi: 10.1016 / j.promfg.2018.03.156

Stock, T., Obenaus, M., Kunz, S., & Kohl, H. (2018). Industry 4.0 as Enabler for a Sustainable Development: A Qualitative Assessment of its Ecological and Social Potential. Process Safety and Environment Protection S0957-5820 (18) 30367-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.026

Teichmann, M., Ullrich, A., & Gronau, N. (2019). Subject-oriented learning - A new perspective for vocational training in learning factories. 9th Conference on Learning Factories, Procedia Manufacturing 31, 72-78. doi: 10.1016 / j.promfg.2019.03.012

Tvengea, N., & Ogorodnyka, O. (2018). Development of evaluation tools for learning factories in manufacturing education. 8th Conference on Learning Factories 2018 - Advanced Engineering Education & Training for Manufacturing Innovation, Procedia Manufacturing 23 33-38. doi: 10.1016 / j.promfg.2018.03.157

Thomas, LJ, Parsons, M., Whitcombe, D. (2018). Assessment in Smart Learning Environments: Psychological Factors Affecting Perceived Learning. Computers in Human Behavior S0747-5632 (18) 30572-7. doi: 10.1016 / j.chb.2018.11.037

Uzun, AM, & Kilis S. (2018). Does Persistent Involvement in Media and Technology Lead To Lower Academic Performance? Evaluating Media End Technology Use in Relation to Multitasking, Self Regulation and Academic Performance. Journal of Computer in Human Behavior , Volume 88, ISSN 0747-5832. doi: 10.1016 / j.chb.2018.08.045

Weber, MR (2019). An exploratory study in student leadership and True Colors personality with learning and training. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 40, 125-133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.08.001

Yap, JBH, Abdul-Rahman, H., & Chen, W. (2017). Collaborative models: Managing design changes with reusable project experiences through project learning and effective communication. International Journal of Project Management 35, 1253-1271. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.010

Zhang, J., Cui, Q. (2018). Collaborative Learning in Higher Nursing Education: A Systematic Review. Journal of Professional Nursing, (Retrieved December 27, 2019 from), doi: 10.1016 / j.profnurs.2018.07.007

Yakimov, PI, & Iovev, AN (2019). Development of a Modern Learning Environment for Education in Mechatronics and Industrial Automation. IFAC Papers On Line 52-25, 441-444. doi: 10.1016 / j.ifacol.2019.12.578

Downloads

How to Cite

Hamid, H., Jalinus, N., Inra, A., Ambiyar, A., Waskito, W., Sukardi, S., & Herlin, N. (2019). Development of Fourth Industry Oriented Mechanical Engineering Mechatronics Learning Devices 4.0. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 3(4), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v3i4.23204

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 4 (2019): November

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with the Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (JERE)  agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)