Curriculum Evaluation of Light Vehicle Engineering Department with Discrepancy Model as Per Industry Needs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i4.28978Keywords:
Evaluasi, discrepancy Model, Kurikulum, SMK Kota PekanbaruAbstract
The implementation of the curriculum as per industrial needs should be improved in terms of qualifications of teachers, tools, practicum materials, and the use of learning models as per industry needs. This study aims to evaluate the used curriculum of light vehicle engineering department as per industry needs. This study uses discrepancy evaluation model (design, installation, process, product and comparison) that describes the implementation of curriculum according to the industry needs from various aspects, namely: design, installation, process, product and comparison. The study results concluded that achievement level of curriculum implementation as needed in the design component obtained an average score of 4.28 (83.17%) classed in a good category; installation components get an average score of 3,502 (78.47%) classified in sufficient categories; process components get an average score of 4.05 (81.75%) classed in a good category; and product components that scored an average of 4.02 (81.26%) classified in a good category. As well as in the comparison component that obtained an average score of 3,324 (74.27%) classified in sufficient categories. The implementation of vocational school curriculum majoring in light vehicle engineering as a whole is categorized as sufficient. Therefore, it needs a follow-up from the relevant parties for a better implementation.; one of which is by revising the curriculum to fit the needs of the industry.
References
Akhmetov, L. G., Kirillova, O. V., Kirillova, T. V., Varlamov, A. V., Kashina, S. G., Safin, R. S., & Sharonov, I. A. (2016). The managerial mechanism of future competitive technical specialists vocational training: The russian experience. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(2). https://www.openrepository.ru/article?id=722347
Antara, N. T. (2019). Penelitian dan Pengembangan Industri. Indonesia Industrial Summit 2019.
Arikunto, S., & Cepi. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Revision). Bumi Aksara.
Bhattacharyya, E. (2018). Stakeholders perspective on communicative competence in industry 4.0: Walk the talk of informative technologists. Les Ulis: EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185303001
Bryce, G. R., Gould, R., Notz, W. I., & Peck, R. L. (2001). Curriculum guidelines for bachelor of science degrees in statistical science. The American Statistician, 55(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001300339879
Buasuwan, P. (2018). Rethinking thai higher education for thailand 4.0. Asian Education and Development Studies, 7(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-07-2017-0072
Curtis.R, F., & Crunkilton. (1984). Curriculum development in vocational and technical education: Planning, content, and implementation. Allyn and Bacon Inc.
Fitzpatrick, J. L. (2004). Exemplars as case studies: Reflections on the links between theory, practice, and context. American Journal of Evaluation, 25(4), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400402500409
Gentili, C. (2017). “Time out” for classical studies? The future of italian liceo classico in the 4.0 world. Estudios Sobre Educación. Estudios Sobre Educación, 33, 127–143. https://dadun.unav.edu/handle/10171/44345
Hang, N. P. T., Thuy, L. T., & Tam, P. T. (2018). Impacting the industry 4.0 on the training quality and student’s satisfaction at lac hong university. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 21(1), 1–18.
Hariyati, N. (2018). Using Social Exchange Theory To Describe Cooperation Partnership Strategy Between Vocational High School With Business/Industrial World. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), 9(8), 668–679. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327529527
Jatmoko, D. (2017). Relevansi kurikulum SMK kompetensi keahlian teknik kendaraan ringan terhadap kebutuhan dunia industri di Kabupaten Sleman. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 3(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v3i1.1572
Murtinugraha, R. E. (2017). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013 pada SMK Negeri Program Keahlian Teknik Bangunan di Jakarta. Jurnal Pensil: Pendidikan Teknik Sipil, 6(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpensil.v6i1.7250
Muryadi, A. D. (2017). Model Evaluasi Program Dalam Penelitian Evaluasi. Jurnal Ilmiah PENJAS, 3(1), 9–18. http://ejournal.utp.ac.id/index.php/JIP/article/view/538
Naser, M. N., & Utami, F. P. (2017). Evaluasi Program Bimbingan Karier Discrepancy Model dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Kinerja Konselor. Prosiding Seminar Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 1(1), 292–302. http://pasca.um.ac.id/conferences/index.php/snbk/article/view/230
Parkay, F. W., Anctil, E. J., & Hass, G. (2014). Curriculum leadership: Readings for developing quality educational programs. Prentice Hall Inc.
Riyanda, A. R., Herlina, K., & Wicaksono, B. A. (2020). Evaluasi Implementasi Sistem Pembelajaran Daring Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Lampung. IKRA-ITH HUMANIORA: Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 4(1), 66–71. https://journals.upi-yai.ac.id/index.php/ikraith-humaniora/article/view/669
Sugianto, A. (2015). Evaluasi Program Individual Learning Plans terhadap Perencanaan Pendidikan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri Se-Kota Barabai-Kalimantan Selatan: Discrepancy Model. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Syauqi, K., Munadi, S., & Triyono, M. B. (2020). Students’ perceptions toward vocational education on online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 881–886. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20766
Triyono, M. B. (2016). Pengembangan isi kurikulum pendidikan teknik alat berat berbasis kebutuhan industri. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 6(3), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v6i3.12159
Vaporizki, S. (2019). Manajemen Kurikulum Berbasis Industri Kreatif Pada Kompetensi Keahlian Kriya Kreatif Logam dan Perhiasan SMKN 12 Surabaya. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(2), 87–71. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jdmp/article/view/4560
Wahzudik, N. (2018). Kendala dan Rekomendasi Perbaikan Pengembangan Kurikulum di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, 6(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcets.v6i2.26712
Wardina, U. V., Jalinus, N., & Asnur, L. (2019). Kurikulum Pendidikan Vokasi Pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Pendidikan, 20(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.33830/jp.v20i1.240.2019
Widoyoko, J. D. (2010). The Education Sector: The fragmentation and adaptability of corruption. In The state and illegality in Indonesia (pp. 165–187). Brill.
Yudistira, R., Ramadhani, N., Indrayana, S. D., & Hadi, W. (2016). Studi Kurikulum SMK Berbasis Industri Kreatif di Indonesia Timur. Imajinasi: Jurnal Seni, 10(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.15294/imajinasi.v10i2.8807
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (JERE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
