The Effectiveness of the Logic Evaluation Model in K-13 Curriculum Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i3.29004Keywords:
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi pelaksanaan (implementasi) Kurikulum 2013 di SMK Negeri 1 Ujungbatu dengan menggunakan Evaluasi Logic Model yang mencakup 4 aspek yaitu, evaluasi input, evaluasi aktivitas, evaluasi output dan evaluasi outcomes.Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of the curriculum using the Logic Evaluation Model which includes 4 aspects; input evaluation, activity evaluation, output evaluation and outcome evaluation. The study approach used was mixed approach with a sequential explanatory method (sequence of evidence). This study was conducted by doing quantitative research first, then continue the research with qualitative methods to find conclusions. The sampling technique used Henry King's Nomogram Table, so that the number of teachers involved in this study was 78. In this study, researchers found that the implementation of Kurikulum 2013 was still quite sufficient with an average score was 3.84 and the TCR was 75.52%. The results of the evaluation of Kurikulum 2013 implementation on the input aspect was good with an average score was 3.96 and the TCR was 80.28%, in activity aspect it is sufficient with 3.70 average score and the TCR was 74.06%, The output aspect of Kurikulum 2013 implementation is sufficient with the average TCR was 3.96 and the average indicator was 73.62%, then the outcomes aspect is sufficient with the average score was 3.73 and the TCR was 74.13%. This research implies that there is a need for improvement in activities, inputs, and outcomes aspect, even though the activity evaluation component showed good Kurikulum 2013 implementation.
References
Basit, A., & Rahmawati, T. H. (2018). Cyber Public Relations (E-PR) dalam Brand Image Wardah Kosmetik dengan Pedekatan Mixed Method. Nyimak (Journal of Communication), 1(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.31000/nyimak.v1i2.483
Clapham, K., Manning, C., Williams, K., OBrien, G., & Sutherland, M. (2017). Using a logic model to evaluate the Kids Together early education inclusion program for children with disabilities and additional needs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 61, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.12.004
Creswell, John W. 2008. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson.
McCoy, C. A., & Castner, J. (2020). Logic Models for Program Evaluation in Emergency Nursing. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 46(1), 12–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2019.11.005
Permendikbud no. 60. 2013. Tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan dan Madrasah Aliyah Kejuruan.
Permendikbud no. 65. 2013. Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Reflianto, R., Sutadji, E., Ariani, F., & Zen, Z. (2018). LOGIC MODEL EVALUATI ON TO WORK ORIENTED EDUCATION PROGRAM. Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 16(2), 335–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21154/cendekia.v16i2.1373
Rochimatun, S. (2016). Optimalisasi Penerapan Metode Diskusi Kelompok Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Ekonomi Dengan Materi Pokok Ekonomi dan Sistem Ekonomi Pada Siswa Kelas X.3 Semester Satu SMA Negeri 3 Sukoharjo Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015. In Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial (Vol. 26, Issue 2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2317/jpis.v26i2.3325
Rohmatulloh, Ro., & Shalahuddin, M. I. (2014). Pengembangan Model Logika Evaluasi Program Pengembangan Sdm Responsif Gender Bidang Esdm. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.22219/jtiumm.vol15.no2.145-153
Swadayaningsih, M. (2020). (FGD) Meningkatkan Kemampuan Guru dalam Memanfaatkan Lingkungan Sekolah Sebagai Sumber Belajar di SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(1), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v4i1.24102
Waluyati, M. (2020). Penerapan Fokus Group Discussian ( FGD ) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Memanfaatkan Lingkungan Sebagai Sumber Belajar. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 8(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jeu.v8i1.27089
Widiyati, W. (2019). Focus Group Discussion (Fgd) Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Kompetensi Ketenagakerjaan Pe-Serta Didik Di Smp N 7 Purworejo. Indonesian Journal of History Education, 7(2), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijhe.v7i2.36432
Wu, H., Shen, J., Jones, J., Gao, X., Zheng, Y., & Krenn, H. Y. (2019). Using logic model and visualization to conduct portfolio evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 74(January), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.02.011
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (JERE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
