Positive Contribution of Creativity and Independence to Student Learning Outcomes in Digital Communication Simulation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i4.29932Abstract
This study aims to measure and analyze the contribution of creativity and independence to student learning outcomes in the tenth-grade digital communication simulation subject in the Department of Tourism. This type of research is quantitative with a correlational approach. The population of this research is 287 people. Sampling in this study was carried out using a proportional random sampling technique. Samples were taken randomly, as much as 20% of the total population. So that 57 respondents were obtained as a sample. The data collection instrument used a questionnaire using a Likert scale. The data analysis technique in this study used simple regression analysis and multiple regression. The results showed the regression equation, Y = 20,211+0,274X1+0,292X2. The data analysis result also showed that learning creativity contributed to learning outcomes by 32.4%. Learning independence contributed to learning outcomes by 42.7%, and learning creativity and learning independence contributed to learning outcomes by 49.5%. Based on these results, learning creativity and learning independence contribute to student learning outcomes in the tenth-grade digital communication simulation subject of the Tourism Department.
References
Bey, A., & Narfin, L. (2013). Pengaruh Kemandirian Belajar Matematika terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 6 Kendari. Universitas Halu Oleo.
Bi, H., Mi, S., Lu, S., & Hu, X. (2020). Meta-analysis of interventions and their effectiveness in students’ scientific creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100750
Castillo-Vergara, M., Barrios Galleguillos, N., Jofré Cuello, L., Alvarez-Marin, A., & Acuña-Opazo, C. (2018). Does socioeconomic status influence student creativity? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29(May), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.005
Darsono. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. IKIP Press.
Gading, I. K., Suja, W., Sudarma, I. K., Divayana, D. G. H., & Widiana, I. W. (2018). Bahan Ajar Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Undiksha Press.
Gralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2019). Are teachers’ ratings of students’ creativity related to students’ divergent thinking? A meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33(July), 100583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100583
Hartley, K. A., Plucker, J. A., & Long, H. (2016). Creative self-efficacy and teacher ratings of student creativity in Chinese elementary classrooms. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.001
Hidayat, R., Huda, C., & Mushafanah, Q. (2017). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Think Talk Write Berbantuan Media Puzzle Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas V Mata Pelajaran IPS SD Negeri Kutosari 02 Batang. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 1(3), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v1i3.11839
Jang, S. J. (2009). Exploration of secondary students’ creativity by integrating web-based technology into an innovative science curriculum. Computers and Education, 52(1), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.002
Jumaisyaroh, T., Napitupulu, E. E., & Hasratuddin, H. (2015). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis dan kemandirian belajar siswa smp melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 5(2), 157–189. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v5i2.3325
Lassig, C. (2020). A typology of student creativity: creative personal expression, boundary pushing and task achievement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36(April), 100654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100654
Machin, A. (2014). Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik, Penanaman Karakter dan Konservasi pada Pembelajaran Materi Pertumbuhan. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 3(1), 28–35.
Mu’tadin. (2009). Kemandirian Sebagai Kebutuhan Psikologis Pada Remaja. Rineka Cipta.
Munandar, S., & Utami, C. (2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas dan Bakat. Rineka Cipta.
Naik, G., Chitre, C., Bhalla, M., & Rajan, J. (2020). Impact of use of technology on student learning outcomes: Evidence from a large-scale experiment in India. World Development, 127, 104736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104736
Rachmayani, D. (2014). Penerapan Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis dan kemandirian belajar matematika siswa. JUDIKA (Jurnal Pendidikan Unsika), 2(1). https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/judika/article/view/118
Rajasulochana, S. R., & Senthil Ganesh, S. (2019). Is assessing learning outcomes a trade-off in experiential learning? Integrating field visit with managerial economics course. International Review of Economics Education, 32(August), 100169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2019.100169
Revalina, N. (2012). Pengaruh Kemandirian Belajar dan Lingkungan Keluarga terhadap Hasil Belajar Ekonomi siswa SMA N 3 padang Panjang. Universitas Negeri Padang.
Sadeghi, A., & Ofoghi, N. (2011). The psychological factors affecting students’ Creativity Inside the Class (CIC) (case study the University of Guilan, Iran). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.084
Sierra, J. (2020). The potential of simulations for developing multiple learning outcomes: The student perspective. International Journal of Management Education, 18(1), 100361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100361
Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Pustaka Pelajar.
Slavin, R. E. (2011). Psikologi Pendidikan: Teori dan Praktik. Terjemahan Marianto Samosir. (9th ed.). Indeks.
Soh, K. (2017). Fostering student creativity through teacher behaviors. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.002
Sundayana, R. (2016). Kaitan antara gaya belajar, kemandirian belajar, dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa SMP dalam pelajaran matematika. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v5i2.262
Suryabrata, S. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Susanto, A. (2013). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Kencana.
Tsai, C. Y., Horng, J. S., Liu, C. H., Hu, D. C., & Chung, Y. C. (2015). Awakening student creativity: Empirical evidence in a learning environment context. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 17, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2015.07.004
van Alten, D. C. D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2020). Self-regulated learning support in flipped learning videos enhances learning outcomes. Computers and Education, 158(July), 104000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104000
Zendler, A., & Greiner, H. (2020). The effect of two instructional methods on learning outcome in chemistry education: The experiment method and computer simulation. Education for Chemical Engineers, 30, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2019.09.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (JERE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
