Indonesian Vocational High School Readiness Toward Society 5.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i1.31567Keywords:
Vocational high school, teacher perception, society 5.0Abstract
Vocational high school comprehensively relates technology studies, the development of acquisition of practical skills, attitudes, and life skills. In this context, teachers play important role in forming and producing competent graduates’ need toward Society 5.0. This study aims to analyze teachers’ perceptions about vocational high school readiness toward Society 5.0. This study used a descriptive quantitative with survey method. The respondents were vocational high school teachers that have been selected using a random sampling method. The result indicated teachers’ understanding of Society 5.0 is low. The school’s readiness to facilitate learning also quite low. The assessments still generalized requirements for student achievement. On the other hand, teachers still have the motivation to learn to use technology. The majority of teachers often attend training to improve instructional media skills. Based on these results, school preparation needs to be improved in terms of teacher competence and learning support facilities for Society 5.0.
References
Aoki, Y., Nakamura, K., & Yuminaka, Y. (2019). Science Education for Society 5 . 0. International Conference on Technology and Social Science, ICTSS 2019, 6–8. http://conf.e-jikei.org/ICTSS/2019/proceedings/materials/proc_files/Keynote/KL-06_Prof.%20Aoki/ICTSS2019_KL-06_Prof.Aoki.pdf.
Apau, S. K. (2017). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Preparedness of Student- Teachers of the Department of Arts and Social Sciences Education of University of Cape Coast Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Preparedness of Student-Teachers of the Departmen. Journal of Education, 8(10), 167–181. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3228.
Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to Online Education in Schools during a SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1263561.
Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., & Lockyer, L. (2017). The process of designing for learning: understanding university teachers’ design work. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9469-y.
Cahapay, M. B. (2020). Rethinking Education in the New Normal Post-COVID-19 Era: A Curriculum Studies Perspective. Aquademia, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/aquademia/8315.
Cahill, M., Hoffman, H., Ingram, E., & Joo, S. (2020). Supporting School Readiness Through Librarian ‑ Child Interactions in Public Library Storytimes : An Analysis of Assessment Scores and Influential Factors. Early Childhood Education Journal, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01133-6.
Chai, C. S., Hwee, J., Koh, L., & Teo, Y. H. (2018). Enhancing and Modeling Teachers ’ Design Beliefs and Efficacy of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge for 21st Century Quality Learning. Journal of Education Computing Research, 57(2), 360–384. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0735633117752453.
Engerman, J. A., Carr-Chellman, A. A., & MacAllan, M. (2019). Understanding learning in video games : A phenomenological approach to unpacking boy cultures in virtual worlds. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2019), 3311–3327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09930-2.
Engerman, J. A., & Otto, R. F. (2021). The shift to digital : designing for learning from a culturally relevant interactive media perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09889-9.
Fisk, P. (2017). Education 4 . 0 … the future of learning will be dramatically different , in school and throughout. The Genius Works. http://www.thegeniusworks.com/2017/01/future-education-young-everyone-taught-together/.
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114(2017), 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019.
Halimah, & Syaddad, H. N. (2020). Preparing the Preservice Teachers to be the Industrial Revolution Teacher 4.0 Era. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 397(ICLIQE 2019), 1165–1173. https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.144.
Huber, S. G., & Helm, C. (2020). COVID-19 and schooling : evaluation , assessment and accountability in times of crises — reacting quickly to explore key issues for policy , practice and research with the school barometer. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(2), 237–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09322-y.
Jan, H. (2017). Teacher of 21 st Century : Characteristics and Development Teacher of 21 st Century : Characteristics and Development. Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(9), 50–54. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234675955.pdf.
Julia, C., & Antoli, J. O. (2018). Impact of implementing a long-term STEM-based active learning course on students ’ motivation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(2), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9441-8.
Koh, J. H. L. (2018). TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(2019), 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9627-5.
Machfiroh, R., Sapriya, & Komalasari, K. (2020). Indonesian Youth Readiness in Supporting Unlimited Education Society 5.0. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 418(Acec 2019), 529–533. https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200320.100.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, S. and T. (2019). Information on MEXT’s measures against COVID-19. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science and Technology of Japan. https://www.mext.go.jp/en/mext_ 00006.html.
Mulyadi, Y. (2019). Vocational Teacher Perception on Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0. Global Conferences Series: Sciences and Technology (GCSST), Volume 2, 2019 The 1st International Conference on Education, Sciences and Technology, 2(2019), 62–68. https://series.gci.or.id/assets/papers/icestech-2019-126.pdf.
Mulyanti, B., Purnama, W., & Pawinanto, R. E. (2020). Distance learning in vocational high schools during the covid-19 pandemic in West Java province, Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(2), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v5i2.24640.
Obana, J. (2020). Could educational technology be a ‘ holy grail ’ amid Covid-19 crisis ? Manila Times. https://www.manilatimes.net/2020/03/18/ business/columnists-business/could-educationaltechnology-be-a-holy-grail-amid-Covid-19-crisis /704202/ .
Onyema, E. M., Sen, S., & Alsayed, A. O. (2020). Impact of Coronavirus Pandemic on Education. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(1), 108–121. https://genbase.iiep.unesco.org/workspace/applis/epidoc/fichiers/EPIDOC/38698_52821_56584_1_PB.pdf.
Pears, K., & Kim, H. K. (2019). School Readiness in Children in Out-of- Home Care. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, 22(2019), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26372-0_8.
Purnamasari, F., Nanda, H. I., Anugrahani, I. S., Muqorrobin, M. M., & Juliardi, D. (2019). The Late Preparation Of Ir 4.0 And Society 5.0: Portrays On The Accounting Students’ Concerns. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 19(5), 212–217. https://seajbel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/SEAJBEL19_282.pdf.
Rahardjo, D., Sumardjo, Lubis, D. P., & Harijati, S. (2016). Internet access and usage in improving students’ self-directed learning in Indonesia open university. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(2), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.90196.
Rusdin, N. M. (2018). Teachers ’ Readiness in Implementing 21 st Century Learning Teachers ’ Readiness in Implementing 21 st Century Learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(4), 1271–1284.
Shiroishi, Y., Uchiyama, K., & Suzuki, N. (2018). Society 5.0: For Human Security and Well-Being. Computer, 51(7), 91–95. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8423130.
Shonfeld, M., & Magen-nagar, N. (2017). The Impact of an Online Collaborative Program on Intrinsic Motivation , Satisfaction and Attitudes. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(2), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9347-7.
Simaremare, S. A., Hasibuan, N. I., & Priyadi, M. (2020). Teacher readiness in accommodating the TPACK framework to meet teacher competence the 21st Century Teacher readiness in accommodating the TPACK framework to meet teacher competence the 21st Century. International Conference on Science Education and Technology, 1151(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012041.
Skobelev, & Borovik. (2017). On The Way From Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: From Digital Manufacturing to Digital Society. International Scientitic Journal “Industry 4.0,” 2(6), 307–311. https://stumejournals.com/journals/i4/2017/6/307.
Spiteri, M., Nu, S., & Rundgren, C. (2018). Literature Review on the Factors Affecting Primary Teachers ’ Use of Digital Technology. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9376-x.
Syarif, M. I., Fauzan, A., & Munir, S. (2019). Statistics in Elementary School for Society 5.0. Innovation in Islamic Education: Challenges and Readiness in Society 5.0, 2019, 159–168. http://ecampus.iainbatusangkar.ac.id/ojs/index.php/proceedings/article/view/2174.
Tondeur, J., Braak, J. Van, & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). Understanding the relationship between teachers ’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education : a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2016), 555–575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9492-z.
Verawardina, U., Asnur, L., Lubis, A. L., Hendriyani, Y., Ramadhani, D., Dewi, I. P., Darni, R., Betri, T. J., Susanti, W., & Sriwahyuni, T. (2020). Reviewing online learning facing the Covid-19 outbreak. Talent Development and Excellence, 12(SpecialIssue3), 385–392.
Wagiran, Pardjono, Suyanto, W., Sofyan, H., Soenarto, S., & Yudantoko, A. (2019). Competencies of future vocational teachers: Perspective of in-service teachers and educational experts. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(2), 388–400.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (JERE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
