Responsibility Attitudes Assessment Instrument for Integrated Thematic Learning of Grade III

Elvira Hoesein Radia; Aulia Ika Wulandari

doi:10.23887/jere.v5i4.33651

Authors

Elvira Hoesein Radia Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Aulia Ika Wulandari Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i4.33651

Keywords:

research dan development, thematic learning, responsibility attitude assessment instruments

Abstract

Lack of assessment instruments and responsibilities in integrated thematic learning for grade III elementary schools. The teacher only observes students' attitudes so that they do not have a complete and valid picture. Based on these findings, the research objective of this study was to produce an assessment of the attitude of responsibility for integrated thematic learning theme 4 sub-theme 1 learning 5 grade III elementary school. This type of research is development research that refers to the theory of Borg and Gall by applying the ADDIE development model. The population of this research is third-grade students. The sample was determined using a random sampling technique with a selection of 23 students. The data collection technique used is an instrument in the form of a questionnaire using a Likert scale. The results showed that the social attitude instrument obtained data from 30 (thirty) statement items. The reliability of the integrated thematic learning responsibility assessment instrument theme 4 sub-theme 1 learning 5 grade III elementary school shows α = 0.759 then the instrument is in the reliable category. The instrument's validity level shows the lowest rcount is 0.411, has a Pearson Correlation XTot ≥ 0,3961 so that the instrument is categorized as valid and feasible to use. By using this assessment instrument, teachers can describe and measure students' attitudes of responsibility. In addition, teachers also assess to consistently assess the standard of student attitudes in the learning process and finding an accurate picture of student attitudes will provide feedback to students.

Author Biography

Elvira Hoesein Radia, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan

References

Astuti, S. I., & Darsinah, D. (2018). Penilaian Autentik Berbasis Kurikulum 2013 di SD Negeri Mangkubumen Kidul No. 16 Surakarta. Manajemen Pendidikan, 13(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.23917/jmp.v13i2.7484.

Darmansyah, D. (2014). Teknik Penilaian Sikap Spritual dan Sosial dalam Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah Dasar 08 Surau Gadang Nanggalo. Al-Ta Lim Journal, 21(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v21i1.67.

Dasopang, M. A., & Montessori, M. (2018). Pengaruh Lingkungan dan Kebiasaan Orangtua Terhadap Perilaku dan Sikap Moral Anak. Journal of Civic Education, 1(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/jce.v1i2.198.

Dessiane, S. T., & Kristin, F. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap Sosialpembelajaran Tematik Kelas 4 SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Indonesia, 6(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpipsi.v6i1.2310.

Febriyanti. (2013). Article Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi Di Era Globalisasi (Pergeseran Dari Kurikulum Inti Dan Institusional Ke Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi). Ta’di Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.19109/tjie.v18i02.51.

Friantary, H., & Martina, F. (2018). Evaluasi Implementasi Penilaian Hasil Belajar Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013 oleh Guru Bahasa Inggris dan Bahasa Indonesia di MTS Ja-Alhaq Kota Bengkulu. Silampari Bisa: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Daerah, Dan Asing, 1(2), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.31540/silamparibisa.v1i2.202.

Glassman, M., Kuznetcova, I., Peri, J., & Kim, Y. (2021). Cohesion, collaboration and the struggle of creating online learning communities: Development and validation of an online collective efficacy scale. Computers and Education Open, 2(January), 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100031.

Hamdi, S., Suganda, I. A., & Hayati, N. (2018). Developing higher-order thinking skill (HOTS) test instrument using Lombok local cultures as contexts for junior secondary school mathematics. Research and Evaluation in Education, 4(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v4i2.22089.

Hidayat, T., Susilaningsih, E., & Kurniawan, C. (2018). The Effectiveness of Enrichment Test Instruments Design to Measure Students’ Creative Thinking Skills and Problem-Solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.011.

Hidayati, W. (2018). Peran Guru Dalam Mengembangkan Sikap Sosial Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Tematik Di Kelas 2B Min 2 Kota Tangerang Selatan. https://doi.org/10.22373/jid.v16i2.593.

Kalalo, R. (2013). Customer Relationship Management Dan Kualitas Pelayanan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Loyalitas Konsumen Pt. Matahari Dept. Store, Manado. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 1(4), 1553–1561. https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v1i4.2960.

Kartowagiran, B., & Jaedun, A. (2016). Model Asesmen Autentik Untuk Menilai Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Smp): Implementasi Asesmen Autentik Di Smp. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.10063.

Krismony, N. P. A., Parmiti, D. P., & Japa, I. G. N. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Untuk Mengukur Motivasi Belajar Siswa SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 3(2), 249. https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v3i2.28264.

Kuntoro, B. T., & Wardani, N. S. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap Sosial Pembelajaran Tematik Kelas III SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 6(3), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3737983.

Kusaeri, K. (2019). Penilaian Sikap Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. JPM : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v5i2.1588.

Latipah, E., Kistoro, H. C. A., & Khairunnisa, I. (2020). Scientific Attitudes in Islamic Education Learning: Relationship and the Role of Self-Efficacy and Social Support. Edukasia : Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam. https://doi.org/10.21043/edukasia.v15i1.7364.

Lestari, N. D. (2018). Analisis Penerapan Kurikulum 2013 Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Ekonomi Di Sma Negeri Se-Kota Palembang. Jurnal Neraca: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Ekonomi Akuntansi, 2(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.31851/neraca.v2i1.2190.

Leutner, D., Fleischer, J., Grunkorn, J., & Klieme, E. (2017). Competence Assessment in Education Research, Models and Instruments. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50030-0_16.

Mahmoudi, E., Samad, A. bt A., & Razak, N. Z. B. A. (2012). Attitude and Students’ Performance in Computer Assisted English Language Learning (CAELL) for Learning Vocabulary. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.293.

Maison, M., Kurniawan, D. A., & Anggraini, L. (2021). Perception, Attitude, and Student Awareness in Working on Online Tasks During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(1), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i1.18039.

Maulida, I., Dibia, I. K., & Astawan, I. G. (2020). The Development of Social Attitude Assessment Instrument and Social Studies Learning Outcomes Grade IV on Theme of Indahnya Keragaman di Negeriku. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, 3(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v3i2.25823.

Mawardi, M. (2014). Model Desain Pembelajaran Konsep Dasar PKn Berbasis Belajar Mandiri Menggunakan Moodle. Widya Sari Press.

Mawardi, M. (2019). Rambu-rambu Penyusunan Skala Sikap Model Likert untuk Mengukur Sikap Siswa. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 9(3), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2019.v9.i3.p292-304.

Mulyadin. (2016). Implementasi Kebijakan Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu Kurikulum 2013 Di SDN Kauman 1 Malang Dan Sd Muhammadiyah 1 Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 3(2), 31 – 48. https://doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v3i2.35.

Nurtanto, M., Arifin, Z., Sofyan, H., Warju, W., & Nurhaji, S. (2020). Development of model for professional competency assessment (Pca) in vocational education: Study of the engine tune-up injection system assessment scheme. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 12(2), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2020.12.02.004.

Oktarina, A., & Fatonah, S. (2021). Pengamatan Tentang Pembelajaran Dan Penilaian Pada Anak Usia Dini Di Era Pandemi Covid-19. Cakrawala Dini: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/cd.v12i1.30278.

Öztürk, M., Akkan, Y., & Kaplan, A. (2020). Reading comprehension, Mathematics self-efficacy perception, and Mathematics attitude as correlates of students’ non-routine Mathematics problem-solving skills in Turkey. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(7), 1042–1058. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1648893.

Praslova, L. (2010). Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in Higher Education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 22(3), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-010-9098-7.

Prasojo, L. D., Wibowo, U. B., & Hastutiningsih, A. D. (2017). Manajemen Kurikulum Program Profesi Guru Untuk Daerah Terdepan, Terluar, Dan Tertinggal Di Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v2i1.538.

Purnami, W., Ashadi, Suranto, Sarwanto, Sumintono, B., & Wahyu, Y. (2021). Investigation of Person Ability and Item Fit Instruments of Eco Critical Thinking Skills in Basic Science Concept Materials for Elementary Pre-Service Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i1.25239.

Rayanto, Y. H., & Sugianti, S. (2020). Applying Obejctivist Instructional Design of Addie Model on Learning Reading Comprehension. 477(Iccd), 795–799. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201017.175.

Safitri, K., & Harjono, N. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap Sosial Aspek Tanggung Jawab Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu Siswa Kelas 4 SD. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 4(1), 111–121. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v4i1.33352.

Siddiq, F., Hatlevik, O. E., Olsen, R. V., Throndsen, I., & Scherer, R. (2019). Taking a future perspective by learning from the past – A systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students’ ICT literacy. Educational Research Review, 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.05.002.

Siddiq, Y. I., Sudarma, I. K., & Simamora, A. H. (2020). Pengembangan Animasi Dua Dimensi pada Pembelajaran Tematik untuk Siswa Kelas III Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 8(2), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.23887/jeu.v8i2.28928.

Subagia, I. W., & Wiratma, I. G. L. (2016). Profil Penilaian Hasil Belajar Siswa Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 5(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v5i1.8293.

Sugihartini, N., & Agustini, K. (2017). Asesmen Otentik sebagai Pendukung Desain Instruksional Jaringan Komputer Berstrategi Blended-Learning dengan Pendekatan Konstruktivistik. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 1(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v1i2.10072.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan Research & Development. Alfabeta.

Suratmi, Laihat, & Asnimar. (2020). Development of Assessment Instruments Based on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) for Elementary School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar (JPsd), 6(1), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.30870/jpsd.v6i2.7356.

Syauqi, K., Munadi, S., & Triyono, M. B. (2020). Students’ perceptions toward vocational education on online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(4), 881. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20766.

Ulfa, I. R. (2019). Implementasi Instrumen Penilaian Sikap di SDN Gunungsaren Bantul. Palapa, 7(2), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.36088/palapa.v7i2.357.

Utami, D. A. P., & Wardani, N. S. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kognitif dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Kelas 5 SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 20(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.12345/lentera.v12i2.463.

Wahyudin, W. (2018). Optimalisasi Peran Kepala Sekolah dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Kependidikan, 6(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v6i2.1932.

Wartawan, P. G. (2018). Scientific Attitude of Students Learning Physics. SHS Web of Conferences, 00118. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jere.v1i4.12498.

Wei, X., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2021). Assessment of cognitive, behavioral, and affective learning outcomes in massive open online courses: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 163, 104097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104097.

Wiana, P. J. A. E., Gading, I. K., & Kusmariyatni, N. (2017). The Application of Authentic Assessment to Improve the Learning Outcomes of Science in the fourth-grade students of SD Negeri 2 Pupuan. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 1(2), 106. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v1i2.9841.

Wildan, W. (2017). Pelaksanaan Penilaian Autentik Aspek Pengetahuan, Sikap Dan Keterampilan Di Sekolah Atau Madrasah. Jurnal Tatsqif, 15(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v15i2.3.

Zulfiani, Suwarna, I. P., & Sumantri, M. F. (2020). Science adaptive assessment tool: Kolb’s learning style profile and student’s higher order thinking skill level. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23840.

Zulkifli, M. (2018). Analisis Bentuk Evaluasi Kurikulum 2013 Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Arab di MI. Al-Madrasah: Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 2(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.35931/am.v0i0.29.