Relationship between Divergent Thinking and Digital Literacy on Teacher Ability to Develop HOTS Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i4.35128Keywords:
gaya berpikir divergen, literasi digital, asesmen HOTSAbstract
Advances in information technology bring changes in various areas of life. The changes that occur should be addressed wisely so that advances in information technology positively impact human life. The world community is currently facing a new era that is more advanced, faster, information that is increasingly difficult to filter, and increasingly open competition. The low ability of high/vocational school mathematics teachers to develop HOTS assessments is a serious problem that must be immediately found a solution to be able to increase student competitiveness in the 21st century. This study aims to analyze the relationship between divergent thinking and the ability of teachers to develop HOTS assessments, the relationship between digital literacy and teachers' abilities to develop HOTS assessments, and the relationship between divergent thinking and digital literacy with teachers' abilities to develop HOTS assessments. This research is a quantitative non-causal survey method. The research design used a correlational regression model. The study population was high school/vocational high school mathematics teachers in Bali, NTB, and NTT. The sample selection used the cluster random sampling technique. Research data were collected using a questionnaire. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression assisted by SPSS 23.0 for Windows. The results show a significant positive relationship between divergent thinking and the ability of teachers to develop HOTS assessments. There is a significant positive relationship between digital literacy and teachers' abilities to develop HOTS assessments. There is a significant positive relationship between divergent thinking and digital literacy and the teacher's ability to develop a HOTS assessment.
References
Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D. . (2001). Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.
Anggrieny, T., Sari, N. P., & Agustina, F. (2017). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Wawancara Tiga Tahap Terhadap Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa Kelas X Man Batam Pada Pokok Bahasan Bakteri the Effect of Cooperative Learning Method Interview With Thype Technique Step on Biology Learning Result St. Cahaya Pendidikan, 3(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.33373/chypend.v3i1.865.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASD Publisher.
Budiharto, S., Himam, F., Riyono, B., & Fahmi, A. (2019). Membangun Konsep Organisasi Autentik. Kajian Metaetnografi. Buletin Psikologi, 27(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.43267.
Caldevilla-Domínguez, D., Martínez-Sala, A. M., & Barrientos-Báez, A. (2021). Tourism and ICT. Bibliometric study on digital literacy in higher education. Education Sciences, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040172.
Chan, B. S. K., Churchill, D., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2017). Digital Literacy Learning In Higher Education Through Digital Storytelling Approach. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v13i1.9907.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Darhim, Prabawanto, S., & Susilo, B. E. (2020). The effect of problem-based learning and mathematical problem posing in improving student’s critical thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1347a.
Dewi, R. M., Sholikhah, N., & Fitrayati, D. (2020). High order thinking skills instrument on microeconomics course: A development research. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13418a.
Eryansyah, Erlina, Fiftinova, & Nurweni, A. (2019). EFL Students ’ Needs of Digital Literacy to Meet the Demands of 21 st Century Skills. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 3(2), 442–460.
Ferrándiz, C., Ferrando, M., Soto, G., Sáinz, M., & Prieto, M. D. (2017). Divergent thinking and its dimensions: What we talk about and what we evaluate? An. Psicol, 33(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.3.224371.
Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Nisyah, M., Kusdiastuti, M., & Herayanti, L. (2020). Improving students’ problem-solving skills using inquiry learning model combined with advance organizer. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13427a.
Hamdi, S., Suganda, I. A., & Hayati, N. (2018). Developing higher-order thinking skill (HOTS) test instrument using Lombok local cultures as contexts for junior secondary school mathematics. Research and Evaluation in Education, 4(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v4i2.22089.
Imelda, Cahyono, B. Y., & Astuti, U. P. (2019). Effect of process writing approach combined with video-based mobile learning on Indonesian EFL learners’ writing skill across creativity levels. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12320a.
LeBlanc, P. J. (2018). Higher Education in a VUCA World. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 50(3–4), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2018.1507370.
Liu, Z. J., Tretyakova, N., Fedorov, V., & Kharakhordina, M. (2020). Digital literacy and digital didactics as the basis for new learning models development. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(14), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i14.14669.
Pratama, G. S., & Retnawati, H. (2018). Urgency of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Content Analysis in Mathematics Textbook Recent citations Urgency of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Content Analysis in Mathematics Textbook. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 12147. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012147.
Pratomo, S., Hendawati, Y., Putri, S. U., Sumiati, T., & Widodo, S. (2019). Divergent thinking of students teachers’ through problem-based learning in environmental science. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012116.
Riadil, I. G., Nuraeni, M., Prakoso, Y. M., & Yosintha, R. (2020). Persepsi Guru Paud Terhadap Sistem Pembelajaran Daring Melalui Whatsapp Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. PAUDIA : Jurnal Penelitian Dalam Bidang Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 9(2), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.26877/paudia.v9i2.6574.
Rini, N. K. R. K., N.L.P, D. K. T., & Dewi, E. S. (2020). A Comparative Study of The Students’ Critical Reading Competency on High Order Thinking Items in A Junior High School. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(4), 380. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i4.28011.
Saleh, H. (2019). Convergent and Divergent Ways of Thinking in Problem Solving: a Case Study on Junior High School Students. International Journal of Insights for Mathematics Teaching, 02(1), 11–21.
Saleh, S. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Biologi. Florea, 6(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.25273/florea.v6i1.4369.
Siriwatchana, K., Na-Songkhla, J., & Nilsook, P. (2018). How to Enhance Digital Literacy Skills among Information Sciences Students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(4), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.4.1050.
Soenarto, S., Sugito, Suyanta, Siswantoyo, & Marwanti. (2020). Vocational and senior high school professional teachers in industry 4.0. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(3), 655–665. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i3.32926.
Spante, M., Hashemi, S. S., Lundin, M., & Algers, A. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1519143.
Sudiarta, I. G. P., & Widana, I. W. (2019). Increasing mathematical proficiency and students character: Lesson from the implementation of blended learning in junior high school in Bali. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012118.
Surur, M., Degeng, I. N. S., Setyosari, P., & Kuswandi, D. (2020). The Effect of Problem-Based Learning Strategies and Cognitive Styles on. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1343a.
Syawaludin, A., Gunarhadi, & Rintayati, P. (2019). Enhancing elementary school students’ abstract reasoning in science learning through augmented reality-based interactive multimedia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.19249.
Victoria, D. S., & Darvas, J. W. (2017). Encouraging Student Autonomy Through Higher Order Thinking Skills. Journal of Instructional Research, 6(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.9743/jir.2017.5.
Wang, Y. (2017). Cultivate Students’ Divergent Thinking in Total Differential Teaching. International Conference on Humanities Science, Management and Education Technology, 96(Hsmet), 1244–1248. https://doi.org/10.2991/hsmet-17.2017.230.
Widana, I. W. (2018). Higher Order Thinking Skills Assessment towards Critical Thinking on Mathematics Lesson. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH), 2(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v2n1.74.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (JERE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)