The Comparison of Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model with STAD on Mathematics Subjects in Junior High School

kamid Kamid; Sri Winarni; Rohati Rohati; Putri Ayu Rivani; Miftahul Zannah Azzahra

doi:10.23887/jere.v6i1.40425

Authors

kamid Kamid Universitas Jambi http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5897-5159
Sri Winarni Universitas jambi
Rohati Rohati Universitas jambi http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4865-1326
Putri Ayu Rivani Universitas Jambi http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7391-129X
Miftahul Zannah Azzahra Universitas Jambi http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7783-0705

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i1.40425

Keywords:

Mathematics, Analytical Thinking, Process Skills, Jigsaw Models, STAD models.

Abstract

The ability to think analytically is one of the competencies that must be possessed by students. Analytical thinking is a thinking ability that involves the process of breaking down material into small pieces and determining the relationships and overall structure. Teachers are required to develop a learning model that is more innovative and fun in the learning process in order to stimulate students' analytical thinking by using the JIGSAW and STAD learning models to further hone their process skills. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of students’ analytical thinking and process skills using the JIGSAW and STAD learning models. This study uses quantitative methods with associative and comparative types, where the data is taken using questionnaire respondents. The subjects of this study were 180 students. From the results obtained, it can be concluded that from the T test results, the difference in analytical thinking using the STAD model and using the Jigsaw model and the process skills variable using the STAD model and Jigsaw model in mathematics subjects. From the results of the correlation test, it is known that there is a relationship between analytical thinking and student process skills using the Jigsaw learning model. So that this research has an impact on the comparison of analytical thinking with student process skills using the JIGSAW and STAD learning models.

References

Al Mutairi, A. O. (2018). The descriptive statistics for the generalized power function distribution. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 21(5), 775–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2018.1453680.

Alhassan, A., & Chen, D. (2019). Investigating business EFL postgraduate student writing in a UK university : a qualitative study Investigating business EFL postgraduate student writing in a UK university : a qualitative study. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1699741.

Apuke, O. D. (2017). Quantitative research methods: A synopsis approach. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 33, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.12816/0040336.

Arifin, F., & Herman, T. (2018). Pengaruh Pembelajaran E-Learning Model Web Centric Course Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Dan Kemandirian Belajar Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 1–12. https://journal.uny.ac.id/files/journals/71/articles/14036/submission/original/14036-34736-1-SM.docx.

Aryani, F., & Hiltrimartin, C. (2014). Pengembangan Lks Untuk Metode Penemuan Terbimbing Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Kelas Viii Di Smp Negeri 18 Palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.5.2.578.

Ashworth, S. H. (2018). A student’s guide to dimensional analysis. Contemporary Physics, 59(4), 408–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2018.1515255.

Azizah, N., Bariyyah, K., & Soejanto, L. T. (2019). Student Team Achievement Division ( STAD ) as an alternative method of guidance and counseling in improving student social interaction. Konselor, 8(2), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.24036/0201982104138-0-00.

Baken, E. K., Adams, D. C., & Rentz, M. S. (2020). Jigsaw method improves learning and retention for observation-based undergraduate biology laboratory activities. Journal of Biological Education, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2020.1796757.

Bankole, Q. A., & Nasir, Z. (2020). Empirical Analysis of Undergraduate Students’ Perception in the Use of Electronic Sources in Kwara State University Library. International Information and Library Review, 53(2), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2020.1805274.

Banks, H. T., Flores, K. B., Langlois, C. R., Serio, T. R., & Sindi, S. S. (2018). Estimating the rate of prion aggregate amplification in yeast with a generation and structured population model. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 26(2), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2017.1316498.

Booker, T. A. (2021). Taking a (Modified) Jigsaw to It: An In-Class Method to Teach Students to Write a Literature Review. College Teaching, 69(1), 58–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1809984.

Brix, T. J., Bruland, P., Sarfraz, S., Ernsting, J., Neuhaus, P., Storck, M., & Dugas, M. (2018). ODM Data Analysis—A tool for the automatic validation, monitoring and generation of generic descriptive statistics of patient data. PloS One, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.019924.

Chang, W. L., & Benson, V. (2020). Jigsaw teaching method for collaboration on cloud platforms. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 00(00), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1792332.

Dehadri, T., & Dehdari, L. (2020). The Effect of a Short Message-Based Nutrition Education Intervention on Employees’ Knowledge and Practice in Terms of Adopting the Methods of Inhibition of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Formation in the Cooked Meat. Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds, 0(0), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10406638.2020.1754866.

Firdaus, M., & Wilujeng, I. (2018). Pengembangan LKPD inkuiri terbimbing untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar peserta didik Developing students worksheet on guided inquiry to improve critical thinking skills and learning outcomes of students. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 4(1), 26–40. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jipi/article/view/5574.

Haj-Kacem, R. B., Herráez, J. V., Al-Arfaj, A. A., Alkhaldi, M. A., Alzamil, N. O., & Ouerfelli, N. (2017). Correlation analysis of the power law parameters for viscosity of some engineering fluids. Physics and Chemistry of Liquids, 55(6), 766–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/00319104.2017.1278759.

Hazmiwati, H. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Ipa Siswa Kelas Ii Sekolah Dasar. Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 7(1), 178. https://doi.org/10.33578/jpfkip.v7i1.5359.

Hendriana, H. (2012). Pembelajaran Matematika Humanis Dengan Metaphorical Thinking Untuk Meningkatkan Kepercayaan Diri Siswa. Infinity Journal, 7(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v1i1.9.

Ilma, R., Hamdani, A. S., & Lailiyah, S. (2017). Profil Berpikir Analitis Masalah Aljabar Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Visualizer dan Verbalizer. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2017.2.1.1-14.

Jaya Wibawa, I. M. A., & Suarjana, I. M. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw I dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 3(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v3i1.17665.

Joffe, M. (2017). Causal theories , models and evidence in economics — some reflections from the natural sciences. Cogent Economics & Finance, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2017.1280983.

Khalil, M., & Najm, H. N. (2018). robabilistic inference of reaction rate parameters from summary statistics. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 22(4), 635–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/13647830.2017.1370557.

Kharisma, E. N. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa SMK Pada Materi Barisan dan Deret. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2018.3.1.62-75.

Khosharay, S., Khosharay, K., Di Nicola, G., & Pierantozzi, M. (2018). Modelling investigation on the thermal conductivity of pure liquid, vapour, and supercritical refrigerants and their mixtures by using Heyen EOS. Physics and Chemistry of Liquids, 56(1), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00319104.2017.1306859.

Kim, B., Park, S., Kim, K., Lim, J., & Nahm, K. (2018). Systematic process to determine DNBR limit of CHF correlation with repetitive cross-validation technique. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 55(9), 1034–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2018.1467287.

Kougiali, Z. G., Soar, K., Pytlik, A., Brown, J., Wozniak, K., Nsumba, F., Wilkins, T., Oliva, E., Osunsanya, S., Clarke, C., Casalotti, S., & Pendry, B. (2020). Jigsaw Recovery: The Spatio-temporalities of Alcohol Abuse and Recovery in a Non-interventionist, Peer-led Service. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 38(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2019.1686960.

Kruit, P. M., Oostdam, R. J., van den Berg, E., & Schuitema, J. A. (2018). Assessing students’ ability in performing scientific inquiry: instruments for measuring science skills in primary education. Research in Science and Technological Education, 36(4), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1421530.

Kurniawan, D. A., Hoyi, R., & Sukarni, W. (2021). Description of Student Response on The Implementation of Cooperative Learning Models of Jigsaw and Role Playing on The Physics Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 17(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v17i1.24315.

Kusumawardani, N., Siswanto, J., & Purnamasari, V. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Berbantuan Media Poster Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 2(2), 170. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v2i2.15487.

Labouta, H. I., Kenny, N. A., Li, R., Anikovskiy, M., Reid, L., & Cramb, D. T. (2018). Learning science by doing science: an authentic science process-learning model in postsecondary education. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1476–1492. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1484966.

Lapinova, S., & Saichev, A. (2017). Comparative statistics of Garman-Klass, Parkinson, Roger-Satchell and bridge estimators. Cogent Physics, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311940.2017.1303931.

Lee, E. G., Jang, G. W., Lee, K. H., & Kweon, D. C. (2020). Guidelines for radiation protection in dental radiographic examinations: a questionnaire-based summary. Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids, 176(5–6), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/10420150.2020.1849215.

Mason, G. (2020). Higher education , initial vocational education and training and continuing education and training : where should the balance lie ? Journal of Education and Work, 00(00), J. Educ. Work. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2020.1755428.

Mutlu, A. (2020). Evaluation of students’ scientific process skills through reflective worksheets in the inquiry-based learning environments. Reflective Practice, 21(2), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2020.1736999.

Ning, J., & Tao, H. (2020). Randomized quasi-random sampling/importance resampling. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 49(12), 3367–3379. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2018.1547398.

Nuryanti., A. . (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(2), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v7i2.34290.

Ormston, R., Spencer, L., Barnard, M., & Snape, D. (2014). The foundations of qualitative research (Vol. 2, Issue 7). SAGE.

Putra, B. K. B., Prayitno, B. A., & Maridi. (2018). The effectiveness of guided inquiry and instad towards students’ critical thinking skills on circulatory system materials. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 476–482. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.14302.

Quay, J. (2016). Not ‘democratic education’but ‘democracy and education’: Reconsidering Dewey’s oft misunderstood introduction to the philosophy of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(10), 1013–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1174098.

Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1017.

Rahmah, R. A., Fakhriyah, F., & Fardani, M. A. (2020). The Influence Of Stad Model Assisted With Alpin Media Towards The Understanding Of Students’ Concepts Theme 6 Grade IV. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(3), 388. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v4i3.27728.

Rohika, D. P. (2017). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Ipa Melalui Penerapan Model Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Division (Stad) Pada Siswa Kelas Iv Sd No. 2 Beng Gianyar Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 1(3), 221. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v1i3.12007.

Rostia, A. (2017). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar IPS Menggunakan Model Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) di Kelas V SDN 22 Batang Anai Kabupaten Padang Pariaman. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 3(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.29210/02017119.

Rumapea, R. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad dan Pemberian Soal Open Ended Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal Matematika. Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 1–14. https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/4551/pdf.

Sadeghi, K., & Ghaderi, F. (2018). Pre-task planning and explicit instruction: Effects on CALF in an oral jigsaw task and gains in linguistic knowledge. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 36(4), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2018.1548298.

Salbiah, S. (2017). Profil Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Menggunakan Pembelajaran Discovery Inquiry Pada Konsep Koloid. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 2(1), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.15575/jta.v2i1.1367.

Santos, M. E. A., Wirtz, P., Montenegro, J., Kise, H., López, C., Brown, J., & Reimer, J. D. (2019). Diversity of Saint Helena Island and zoogeography of zoantharians in the Atlantic Ocean: Jigsaw falling into place. Systematics and Biodiversity, 17(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2019.1572667.

Setiaji, B., Ariadi, P., & Dinata, C. (2020). Analisis kesiapan mahasiswa jurusan pendidikan fisika menggunakan e-learning dalam situasi pandemi Covid-19 Analysis of e-learning readiness on physics education students during Covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 59–70. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jipi/article/view/31562.

Setiawan, Y. E. (2020). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menilai Kebenaran Suatu Pernyataan. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 7(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v7i1.14495.

Solé-Llussà, A., Aguilar, D., & Ibáñez, M. (2019). Video worked examples to promote elementary students’ science process skills: a fruit decomposition inquiry activity. Journal of Biological Education, 00(00), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1699149.

Sri Astiti, D. K., & Murda, I. N. (2017). Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Jigsaw Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Ipa Pada Siswa Kelas Iv Sd. Journal of Education Action Research, 1(2), 94. https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v1i2.12043.

Stender, A., Schwichow, M., Zimmerman, C., & Härtig, H. (2018). Making inquiry-based science learning visible: the influence of CVS and cognitive skills on content knowledge learning in guided inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1812–1831. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1504346.

Stylinski, C. D., Peterman, K., Phillips, T., Linhart, J., & Becker-Klein, R. (2020). Assessing science inquiry skills of citizen science volunteers: a snapshot of the field. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 10(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1719288.

Sugianto, Armanto, D., & Harahap, M. B. (2014). Perbedaan Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMA. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 1(1), 96–128. http://www.e-repository.unsyiah.ac.id/DM/article/view/1332.

Sukmaningtyas, B., & Madang, K. (2018). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw terhadap berpikir tingkat tinggi ( higher order thinking skills ) kelas xi pada materi sistem pencernaan di sma negeri 1 tanjung raja. Jurnal Pembelajaran Biologi: Kajian Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 5(2), 191–198. https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/fpb/article/view/7062.

Tegeh, I. M., Parwata, I. G. L. A., & Ostaviani, B. G. (2020). The Observing Learning Activity Assisted by Concrete Media Improves Student’s Conceptual Knowledge. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(2), 182. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i2.25206.

Toril, P., Reales, J. M., Mayas, J., & Ballesteros, S. (2018). Effects of age and type of picture on visuospatial working memory assessed with a computerized jigsaw-puzzle task. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 25(6), 852–873. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2017.1377680.

Vansteensel, M. J., Kristo, G., Aarnoutse, E. J., & Ramsey, N. F. (2017). The brain-computer interface researcher’s questionnaire: from research to application. Brain-Computer Interfaces, 4(4), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2017.1366237.

Vartiainen, J., & Kumpulainen, K. (2020). Playing with science: manifestation of scientific play in early science inquiry. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 28(4), 490–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2020.1783924.

Wati, M., & Anggraini, W. (2019). Strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw: pengaruhnya terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 98–106. http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/IJSME/article/view/3976.

Wijaya, H., & Arismunandar, A. (2018). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Berbasis Media Sosial. Jurnal Jaffray, 16(2), 175. https://doi.org/10.25278/jj71.v16i2.302.

Wulandari, T., Amin, M., Zubaidah, S., & Iam, M. (2017). Students’ Critical Thinking Improvement Through PDEODE and STAD Combination in The Nutrition and Health Lecture. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 6(2), 110. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v6i2.7589.

Yanti, O. F., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Model Problem Based Learning, Guided Inquiry, dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(2), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2017.2.2.120-130.