Survey Attitude Toward The Level Of Understanding Of Descriptive Statistics by Students in Higher Education: Pair Comparison Methode
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v8i1.63450Keywords:
Descriptive statistics, Higher Education, ComprehensionAbstract
Many people find statistics very difficult. This impacts students not only on their academic performance but also on unpleasant influences or negative perceptions. This research aims to produce a scaling instrument for attitudes toward student statistics levels using the pair comparison method with valid and reliable characteristics. This research is a quantitative descriptive research by developing a research instrument with a pair comparison scale. The subjects of this research were 160 students who had received courses. This instrument consists of 11 dimensions that measure students' attitudes toward their level of understanding of statistics. The analysis uses quantitative description. The results of scaling the student attitude instrument towards the level of understanding of statistics using the pair comparison method show that the characteristics of each dimension are valid and the Cronbach value meets high-reliability criteria. The results of scaling the attitude instrument towards statistical material with the highest average response order were in the material understanding mode," with a value of 0.695. This high-reliability value can indicate a wider range of abilities, meaning more heterogeneous. With this pair comparison method scaling, it can capture substantial heterogeneity in a person's personal value hierarchy, and it is easier for respondents to answer because they compare two objects.
References
Abbiati, N. N., Fabrizio, M. D. C., López, M. V., Pérez, A., Plencovich, M. C., & Cueto, G. (2021). Attitudes Related To Students’ Performance in Statistics in University Programs in Argentina. Statistics Education Research Journal, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.52041/SERJ.V20I2.356.
Akour, M. M. (2022). Rasch rating scale analysis of the survey of attitudes toward statistics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12646.
Arfandi, A., Purnamawati, & Nurfaedah. (2020). The development of a Thurstone scale for identifying teacher ability in using information and communication technology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1456(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1456/1/012038.
Ayebo, A., Bright, J., & Ballam, C. (2019). Examining the Factor Structure of the Survey of Attitudes Towards Statistics among Undergraduate Health Science Students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5942.
Azwar, Saifuddin. (2020). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi Edisi 2. Pustaka Pelajar.
Azwar, Syaifuddin. (2012). Tes Prestasi. Pustaka Pelajar.
Bahar, R., Setiawati, F. A., Sutarji, A., Hidayat, O., & Sudarna, N. (2021). Measurement in Educational Research Comparison of the Thurstone Scale method in measuring teacher personality competence. 1(2), 97–103.
Birbal, D. R., Ramdass, D. M., & Harripaul, M. C. (2018). Student Teachers’ Attitudes towards Blended Learning. Journal of Education and Human Development, 7(2), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v7n2a2.
Büscher, C. (2022). Design Principles for Developing Statistical Literacy in Middle Schools. Statistics Education Research Journal, 21(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v21i1.80.
Cahyawati, D., Wahyudin, & Prabawanto, S. (2020). Students’ statistical reasoning reviewed from academic internal factors in two learning classes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1480(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1480/1/012051.
Crettaz von Roten, F., & de Roten, Y. (2023). Undergraduate sport sciences students’ attitudes towards statistics: A gender perspective. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 33(May), 100452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2023.100452.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Cengage Learning Pu.
Ebel, R. L. & Frisbie, D. A. (1986). Essentials of educational measurement. Prentice Hall. Inc.
Emilia, N. R., & Amir, M. F. (2022). Treffinger Learning to Enhance Statistical Literacy Primary Student. 11(3), 522–532.
Gradvohl, E., Lukács, Á. J., Takács, J., Fritúz, G., Falus, A., & Feith, H. J. (2023). Development and validation of the questionnaire on resuscitation-related knowledge and attitude for adolescents. Evaluation and Program Planning, 100(September 2021), 102338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102338.
Guffey, J. E., Larson, J. G., Zimmerman, L., & Shook, B. (2007). The Development of a Thurstone Scale for Identifying Desirable Police Officer Traits. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 22(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-007-9001-8.
Halik, A., Khumairo, A., & Yawisah, U. (2022). The Instrument Construction for Students’ Religious Moderation: Psychometric Analysis. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam), 5(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.32505/enlighten.v5i2.4895.
Hommik, C., & Luik, P. (2017). Adapting the survey of attitudes towards statistics (SATS-36) for Estonian secondary school students. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(1), 228-239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.52041/serj.v16i1.229.
Iijima, Y., Okumura, Y., Yamasaki, S., Ando, S., Okada, K., Koike, S., Endo, K., Morimoto, Y., Williams, A., Murai, T., Tanaka, S. C., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M., Kasai, K., & Nishida, A. (2020). Assessing the hierarchy of personal values among adolescents: A comparison of rating scale and paired comparison methods. Journal of Adolescence, 80(February), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.02.003.
Jatisunda, M. G., Nahdi, D. S., & Suciawati, V. (2020). Literasi Statistika Mahasiswa Adminitrasi Publik. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 4(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v4i2.3488.
Jones, M. G., Chesnutt, K., Ennes, M., Macher, D., & Paechter, M. (2022). Measuring science capital, science attitudes, and science experiences in elementary and middle school students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 74(April), 101180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101180.
Kornak, J., Fields, J., Kremers, W., Farmer, S., Heuer, H. W., Forsberg, L., Brushaber, D., Rindels, A., Dodge, H., Weintraub, S., Besser, L., Appleby, B., Bordelon, Y., Bove, J., Brannelly, P., Caso, C., Coppola, G., Dever, R., Dheel, C., … Rosen, H. (2019). Nonlinear Z-score modeling for improved detection of cognitive abnormality. Alzheimer’s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring, 11, 797–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2019.08.003.
Kula Kartal, S., & Gülleroğlu, H. D. (2015). Ölçekleme Yaklaşımlarının Madde ve Birey Sıralamaları Açısından Karşılaştırılması. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 6(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.53309.
Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., & Melsayanti, R. (2019). Students’ attitude towards natural sciences. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(3), 455–460. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.16395.
Liaghatdar, M. J., Soltani, A., & Abedi, A. (2011). A Validity Study of Attitudes toward Science Scale among Iranian Secondary School Students. International Education Studies, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v4n4p36.
Lipovetsky, S. (2007). Thurstone scaling in order statistics. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45(7–8), 917–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2006.09.009.
Lord, F.M. & Novick, M. R. (1974). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Wesley.
Lukman, L., Wahyudin, W., Suryadi, D., Dasari, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2022). Studying Student Statistical Literacy in Statistics Lectures on Higher Education Using Grounded Theory Approach. Infinity Journal, 11(1), 163. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i1.p163-176.
Mardapi, djemari. (2008). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Non Tes. Mitra Cendekia Press.
Maryati, I. (2017). Analisis Kesulitan Dalam Materi Statistika Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Penalaran Dan Komunikasi Statistis. Prisma, 6(2), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v6i2.209.
Masfingatin, T., & Suprapto, E. (2020). Student’s Statistical Literacy skills Based on the Reflective and Impulsive Cognitive Styles. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v11i2.6902.
Masjudin, M., Muzaki, A., Abidin, Z., & Ariyanti, I. A. P. (2020). Analysis of student’s statistical thinking ability in understanding the statistical data. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032063.
McDonald, R. P. (2013). Test theory: A unified treatment. Pyschology Press.
Moore, D. S., McCabe, G. P., & Craig, B. A. (1997). New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics International statistical review.
Mulya, N., Nurlaelah, E., & Prabawanto, S. (2018). Students ’ statistical literacy on junior high school. In International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 3, 710–714.
Musfira, A. F. (2022). Sentiment Analysis of Tweets Regarding Sri Lankan Crisis using Automatic Coding in ATLAS . ti 22 Presented by South Eastern University of Sri Lanka. August.
Nolan, M. M., Beran, T., & Hecker, K. G. (2012). Surveys assessing students’ attitudes toward statistics: A systematic review of validity and reliability. Statistics Education Research Journal, 11(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v11i2.333.
Nurlita, M. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Pengetahuan Mahasiswa. 4(November), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JPZ2F.
Pratama, D. (2020). Pengembangan Skala Thurstone Metode Equal Appearing Interval untuk Mengukur Sikap Moderasi Beragama Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Psikologi Teori dan Terapan, 11(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v11n1.p71-82.
Pritikin, J. N. (2020). An exploratory factor model for ordinal paired comparison indicators. Heliyon, 6(9), e04821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04821.
Pudaruth, S., Moheeputh, S., Permessur, N., & Chamroo, A. (2018). Sentiment Analysis from Facebook Comments using Automatic Coding in NVivo 11. ADCAIJ: Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal, 7(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.14201/adcaij2018714148.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian (panduan peneliti, Mahsiswa dan Psikometri). Parama Publishing.
Robert F. DeVellis. (2019). Frank D. Brown Hall Room 3208. To Achieve Excellence by Guiding Individuals as They Become Professionals”, 1–7.
Schau, C. (2003). Students’ attitudes: The “other” important outcome in statistics education. Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, 3673–3681.
Setiawan, E. P., & Sukoco, H. (2021). Exploring first year university students’ statistical literacy: A case on describing and visualizing data. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(3), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.12.3.13202.427-448.
Setiawati, F. A., Mardapi, D., & Azwar, S. (2013). Penskalaan Teori Klasik Instrumen Multiple Intelligences Tipe Thurstone Dan Likert. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 17(2), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v17i2.1699.
Shahirah, S., & Moi, N. (2019). Investigating the Validity and Reliability of Survey Attitude towards Statistics Instrument among Rural Secondary School Students. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(4), 651–661. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.4.651.
Sutter, C. C., Givvin, K. B., Tucker, M. C., Givvin, K. A., Leandro-Ramos, A., & Solomon, P. L. (2022). Student Concerns and Perceived Challenges in Introductory Statistics, How the Frequency Shifted during COVID-19, and How They Differ by Subgroups of Students. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2022.2132325.
Ullah, K., Aslam, M., & Sindhu, T. N. (2020). Bayesian analysis of the Weibull paired comparison model using informative prior. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59(4), 2371–2378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.02.032.
Xu, C., & Schau, C. (2019). Exploring method effects in the six-factor structure of the survey of attitudes toward statistics (SATS-36). Statistics Education Research Journal, 18(2), 39-53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10. 52041/serj.v18i2.139.
Yurtcu, M., & Dogan, N. (2015). Scaling with Paired Comparison Method for Reasons for Mathematics Anxiety of Secondary School Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(February), 851–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.209.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 nusrotus sa'idah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (JERE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)