The Effect of Adverse Selection and Psychological Capital on Decision Making Involving Escalation Situations: An Experimental Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jia.v6i1.30239Keywords:
adverse selection, agency theory, escalation of commitment, psychological capitalAbstract
This study examines the determinant of structural variable (adverse selection) and psychological variable (psychological capital – PsyCap) on manager’s tendency to escalate their commitment. This study used 2 x 2 factorial experimental design as a research method. The participant of this study is management and accounting master students who act as the surrogate of project manager. Used ANOVA as the data analysis technique, this study found a main effect of adverse selection and PsyCap in predict the escalation of commitment. However, there is no effect of the interaction between those two variables on escalation of commitment. This study contributes to the literature of escalation of commitment as well as psychological capital literature, considering that PsyCap is always associated with positive outcome but this study found that the high PsyCap might also predict undesirable outcome such as escalation of commitment.References
Ang, N., & Cheng, M. M. (2016). Does Self-Certification Encourage or Reduce Opportunistic Behavior? Behavioral Research in Accounting, 28(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51468
Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Positive Psychological Capital on Employee Attitudes , Behaviors , and Performance. 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq
Babatunde, A. Y. (2016). Perceived Self-Efficacy and Dispositional Optimism in Leaders’ Behavioral Escalation of Commitment [Walden University]. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/2200
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman.
Bazerman, M. H., Giuliano, T., & Appelman, A. (1984). Escalation of Commitment in Individual and Group Decision Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33(2), 141–152.
Berg, J. E., Dickhaut, J. W., & Kanodia, C. (2009). The Role of Information Asymmetry in Escalation Phenomena: Empirical Evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 69(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2007.07.007
Booth, P., & Schulz, A. K.-D. (2004). The Impact of an Ethical Environment on Managers’ Project Evaluation Judgments Under Agency Problem Conditions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5–6), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00012-6
Bowen, M. G. (1987). The Escalation Phenomenon Reconsidered: Decision Delemmas or Decision Errors? The Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 52–66.
Bragger, J. D., Bragger, D., Hantula, D. A., Kirnan, J., & Kutcher, E. (2003). When Success Breeds Failure: History, Hysteresis, and Delayed Exit Decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 6–14.
Brockner, J. (1992). The Escalation of Commitment to a Course of Action: The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1981.4285694
Buxton, M., & Rivers, R. (2014). Escalation of Commitment: The Effects of Magnitude of Loss, Monitoring and the Presence of an Alternative Investment. Can a Project 90% Complete be Stopped? Journal of Accounting and Finance, 14(5), 152.
Chong, V. K., & Suryawati, R. F. (2010). De-escalation Strategy: The Impact of Monitoring Control on Managers’ Project Evaluation Decisions. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 8(2), 39–50.
Chong, V. K., & Syarifuddin, I. (2010). Escalation of Commitment to Unprofitable Projects: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Conformity Pressure and Self-esteem. Accounting, Accountability & Performance, 16(1 & 2), 1–24.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement With Everyday Life (1st ed.). Basic Books.
Dewi, H. R., & Supriyadi. (2012). The Effectiveness of Monitoring Controls and Individual Moral Reasoning in the De-escalation of Commitments. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 15(1), 1–20.
Harrell, A., & Harrison, P. (1994). An Incentive to Shirk, Privately Held Information, and Managers’ Project Evaluation Decions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(7), 569–577.
Harrison, P. D., & Harrell, A. (1993). Impact of “Adverse Selection” on Managers’ Project Evaluation Decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 635–643. https://doi.org/10.2307/256596
Kanodia, C., Bushman, R., & Dickhaut, J. (1989). Escalation Errors and the Sunk Cost Effect: An Explanation Based on Reputation and Information Asymmetries. Journal of Accounting Research, 27(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491207
Kisfalvi, V. (2000). The Threat of Failure, The Perils of Success and CEO Character: Sources of Strategic Persistence. Organizational Studies, 21(3), 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840600213006
Kluemper, D. H., Little, L. M., & DeGroot, T. (2009). State or Trait: Effects of State Optimism on Job-related Outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.591
Leigh, B. C. (1999). Peril, Chance, and Adventure: Concepts of Risk, Alcohol Use and Risky Behavior in Young Adults. Addiction, 94, 371–383.
Luthans, F. (2002a). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2002.6640181
Luthans, F. (2002b). The Need For and Meaning of Positive Organizational Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 695–706.
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological Capital: Developing the Human. Oxford University Press.
Mahlendorf, M. D., & Wallenburg, C. M. (2013). Public Justification and Investment in Failing Projects: The Moderating Effect of Optimistic Outcome Expectations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(11), 2271–2286. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12177 Majer
Moser, K., Wolff, H.-G., & Kraft, A. (2013). The De-escalation of Commitment: Predecisional Accountability and Cognitive Processes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(2), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01005.x
Narsa, N. P. D. R. H., & Narsa, I. M. (2018). The Relationship Between Psychological Capital and the Escalation of Commitment in Capital Project Continuation Decisions: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Management, 12(Special Issue 1), 91–104.
Narsa, N. P. D. R. H., & Supriyadi. (2019). The role of companies’ codes of ethics in mitigating managers’ escalation behavior in the frame of agency theory. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26(1–2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2019.1546563
Narsa, N. P. D. R. H., & Wijayanti, D. M. (2021). The Importance of Psychological Capital on the Linkages between Religious Orientation and Job Stress. Journal of Asia Business Studies, Vol. ahead(No. ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-09-2018-0251
Newman, A., Ucbasaran, D., Zhu, F., & Hirst, G. (2014). Psychological Capital: A Review and Synthesis. Journal of Organizational Behaviorq, 35, S120–S138. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1916
Roberts, R. P. (2013). The Impact of Authentic Leadership and Adverse Selection Conditions on Escalation of Commitment Committee Members. Drexel University.
Ronay, R., Oostrom, J. K., Lehmann-willenbrock, N., & Vugt, M. Van. (2017). Pride Before The Fall: (Over)confidence Predicts Escalation of Public Commitment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 13–22.
Ross, J., & Staw, B. M. (1993). Organizational Escalation and Exit: Lessons From the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 701–732.
Rutledge, R. W., & Karim, K. E. (1999). The Influence of Self-Interest and Ethical Considerations on Managers’ Evaluation Judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(2), 173–184.
Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2000). Change in Job Search Behaviors and Employment Outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 277–287.
Salter, S. B., & Sharp, D. J. (2001). Agency Effects and Escalation of Commitment: Do Small National Culture Differences Matter? The International Journal of Accounting, 36(1), 33–45.
Schulz-Hardt, S., Thurow-Kröning, B., & Frey, D. (2009). Preference-based Escalation: A New Interpretation for The Responsibility Effect in Escalating Commitment and Entrapment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.11.001
Sleesman, D. J., Conlon, D. E., McNamara, G., & Miles, J. E. (2012). Cleaning Up the Big Muddy: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Determinants of Escalation of Commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 541–562.
Snyder, C. R. (2000). Handbook of Hope: Theory, Measures, and Applications. Academic Press.
Taylor, S. E., & Stanton, A. L. (2007). Coping Resources, Coping Processes, and Mental Health. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3(1), 377–401.
Venkatesh, R., & Blaskovich, J. (2012). The Mediating Effect of Psychological Capital on the Budget Participation-Job Performance Relationship. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 24(1), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50202
Whyte, G., Saks, A. M., & Hook, S. (1997). When success breeds failure : The role of self-efficacy in escalating commitment to a losing course of action. 18(April 1996), 415–432.
Xing, C., Sun, J., & Resources, H. (2013). The role of Psychological Resilience and Positive Affect in Risky Decision-Making. 48(5), 935–943.
Youssef, C. M., & Luthans, F. (2007). Positive Organizational Behavior in the Workplace: The Impact of Hope, Optimism, and Resilience. Journal of Management, 33(5), 774–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307305562
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).