The Concept of Heat Transfer measured by Cognitive Domain Assessment Instruments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v5i1.34328Keywords:
concept of heat transfer, domain assessmentAbstract
The lack of availability in assessment instruments used and unmet cognitive levels of C3-C6 resulted in poor quality assessments. This study aims to develop cognitive domain assessment instruments on the concept of heat transfer material in grade V elementary school. This research was development research that used 4D models (Four-D models) to define, design, develop, and disseminate. The subject of study was the assessment instrument of the cognitive realm with the object of research, that was the instrument quality. Measurement of the validity of the content was done on two experts/judges using the non-test method and instruments of the expert validity sheet. Instrument quality measurement was conducted with field trials of 106 students using multiple-choice objective test instruments. The content validity data obtained were analyzed with the Gregory formula, while the field test result data analyzed the validity of the grain, reliability, different power, and difficulty level. The results showed that the validity of the content obtained by 0.97 (very high) with the test results of the item's validity got 30 points of the question was declared valid. The instrument reliability index was developed by 0.85 (very high). The average coefficient of different power obtained is 0.51 (good) with a test device difficulty of 0.52 (medium). The result demonstrated cognitive domain assessment instruments that were developed feasible and can be used in conducting learning assessments in the cognitive realm.
References
Akhsan, H., Wiyono, K., Novianti, R., Melvany, N. E., & Ariska, M. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Materi Fluida dan Getaran Harmonis. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 9(2), 33–40. http://sij-inovpend.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sij-inovpend/index.
Arifin, Z., & Retnawati, H. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Pengukur Higher Order Thinking Skills Matematika Siswa SMA Kelas X. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v12i1.14058.
Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta:PT Bumi Aksara.
Arini, F. Z. R., Susilaningsih, E., & Dewi, N. K. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen penilaian Proses untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Sains dan Aktivitas Siswa SMP. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 6(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v6i2.19715.
Asiah, H. A., Susilaningsih, E., & Nuswowati, M. (2017). Inovasi Model Penilaian Proses Pada Pembelajaran Kimia Untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Laboratorium Dan Aktivitas Siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 11(2), 1997–2007. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JIPK/article/view/10624.
Bala, A. A., Jatau, A. I., Yunusa, I., Mohammed, M., Mohammed, A. K. H., Isa, A. M., Sadiq, W. A., Gulma, K. A., Bello, I., Malami, S., Michael, G. C., & Chedi, B. A. Z. (2020). Development and validation of antisnake venom knowledge assessment tool (AKAT) for healthcare practitioners. Toxicon: X, 8(September), 100064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxcx.2020.100064.
Blazquez, R. A., Corchon, S., & Ferrer Ferrandiz, E. (2017). Validity of instruments for measuring the satisfaction of a woman and her partner with care received during labour and childbirth: Systematic review. Midwifery, 55(June), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.014.
Candiasa, M. (2011). Pengujian Instrumen Penelitian Disertai Aplikasi ITEMAN dan BIGSTEPS. Unit Penerbitan Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
Casanova, J. R., Gomes, C. M. A., Bernardo, A. B., Núñez, J. C., & Almeida, L. S. (2021). Dimensionality and reliability of a screening instrument for students at-risk of dropping out from Higher Education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68(1–8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100957.
Desilva, D., Sakti, I., & Medriati, R. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Fisika Berorientasi HOTS (High Order Thinking Skills) pada Materi Elastisitas dan Hukum Hooke. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika, 3(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.3.1.41-50.
Gaol, P. L., Khumaedi, M., & Masrukan. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Karakter Percaya Diri pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16209.
Iskandar, A., & Rizal, M. (2017). Analisis Kualitas Soal di Perguruan Tinggi Berbasis Aplikasi TAP. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 21(2), 12–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i1.15609.
Ko, M. M., Lee, M. S., Birch, S., & Lee, J. A. (2017). The reliability and validity of instruments measuring pattern identification in Korean medicine: A systematic review. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 15(May), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2017.09.005.
Koyan, I. W. (2011). Asesmen dalam Pendidikan. Singaraja:Universitas Pendidikan GaneshaPress.
Krismony, N. P. A., Parmiti, D. P., & Japa, I. G. N. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Untuk Mengukur Motivasi Belajar Siswa SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 3(2), 249–257. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v3i2.
Morad, S., Ragonis, N., & Barak, M. (2021). The validity and reliability of a tool for measuring educational innovative thinking competencies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103193.
Mudanta, K. A., Astawan, I. G., & Jayanta, I. N. L. (2020). Instrumen Penilaian Motivasi Belajar dan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Mimbar Ilmu, 25(2), 262–270. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/mi.v25i2.26611.
Mulyatiningsih, E. (2014). Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan. Bandung:Alfabeta.
Mustari, M. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Ranah Kognitif pada Pokok Bahasan Fluida Statis SMA/MA. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 5(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v5i1.112.
Ndiung, S., & Jediut, M. (2020). Pengembangan instrumen tes hasil belajar matematika peserta didik sekolah dasar berorientasi pada berpikir tingkat tinggi. Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 10(1), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v10i1.6274.
Nugroho, A. N., & Airlan, G. S. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Pembelajaran IPA Kelas 4 SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 3(3), 400–407. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v3i3.
Nurhayati, & Angraeni, L. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Mahasiswa (Higher Order Thinking) dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Konsep Optika melalui Model Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.21009/1.03201.
Pratiwiningtyas, B. N., Susilaningsih, E., & Sudana, I. M. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kognitif untuk Mengukur Literasi Membaca Bahasa Indonesia Berbasis Model Pirls pada Siswa Kelas IV SD. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16199.
Pujawan, I., Parmiti, D. P., & Astawan, I. G. (2020). Assessment Instrument of Social Attitude and Science Learning Outcomes of Grade IV Elementary School. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(4), 604–613. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JISD/article/view/26580.
Sa’idah, N., Yulistianti, H. D., & Megawati, E. (2019). Analisis Instrumen Tes Higher Order Thinking Matematika SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.13.1.6619.41-54.
Safitri, D., & Oktavia, M. (2017). Implementasi Penilaian Autentik Kurikulum 2013 (Studi Kasus Guru IPS di SMP Labschool Jakarta). Edukasi IPS, 01(1), 31–40. http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/eips/article/view/3207.
Santee, J. A., Marszalek, J. M., & Hardinger, K. L. (2019). A critique of validity analysis from instruments assessing the affective domain. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.11.010.
Shirali, G., Shekari, M., & Angali, K. A. (2018). Assessing Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for Measuring Resilience Safety Culture in Sociotechnical Systems. Safety and Health at Work, 9(3), 296–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2017.07.010.
Soleh, A., Khumaedi, M., & Pramono, S. E. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Mata Pelajaran PKn Standar Kompetensi Memahami Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Sistem Pemerintahan di Indonesia. Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation, 6(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16210.
Sonmes, F. D., Cuhadar, S., & Kahvecioglu, M. K. (2021). Successes, challenges, and next steps in implementing outcome-based assessment: The case of Istanbul Bilgi University Library. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102249.
Taufiqurrahman, Heryandi, M. T., & Junaidi. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Higher Order Thinking Skill pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran, 2(2), 199–206. https://www.ojs.pps-ibrahimy.ac.id/index.php/jpii/article/view/74
Utami, D. A. P., & Wardani, N. S. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kognitif dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Kelas 5 SD. LENTERA: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 13(1), 1–18. http://stkippgribl.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/lentera/article/view/463.
Vial, A., van der Put, C., Stams, G. J. J. M., Dinkgreve, M., & Assink, M. (2021). Validation and further development of a risk assessment instrument for child welfare. Child Abuse and Neglect, 117(April), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105047.
Widiana, I. G. K., Dantes, N., & Parmiti, D. P. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kognitif Pembelajaran Tematik Tema 8 Subtema 1 pada Siswa Kelas V SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 3(3), 478–485. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v3i3.29428.
Widyaningsih, I. A. T., Dibia, I. K., & Sudana, D. N. (2020). Instrument Appropriateness On The Assessment Of Fourth Grade Science Learning Outcomes In Elementary Schools. Internasional Journal of Elementary Education, 4(4), 472–480. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/IJEE/article/download/27209/17627.
Wirayasa, I. D. G. P., Darmayasa, I. P., & Satyawan, I. M. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Ranah Kognitif Model 4D pada Materi Sepak Bola Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga Dan Kesehatan, 8(3), 81–88. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJP/article/view/33760.
Yustiana, S., & Ulia, N. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Diri Berbasis Pembelajaran Kontekstual. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 6(2), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v1i2.8998.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Journal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)