Examining the Mind Mapping Model in Mathematics Learning for Elementary School Students: Self-Efficacy and Motivation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v8i1.67080Keywords:
Mind Mapping, Mathematics Learning, Self-Efficacy, MotivationAbstract
The challenges of student learning in the 4.0 era must be balanced with mastery of 21st century skills. Mastery of skills must be balanced with students' mental maturity. The mental maturity of student learning can be developed by applying an effective learning model. The mind mapping learning model has various advantages for shaping the maturity of students' thinking patterns. This research was conducted with the aim of examining the application of the mind mapping model for self-efficacy and student motivation. The research subjects were 10 grade IV elementary school students. This research method is a quasi-experimental study that compares pretest and posttest values. The data collection techniques used were observation and interview techniques, which were converted into a value of 1–100. Data analysis was carried out, both quantitatively and qualitatively. The results of the study showed that there was an increase in pretest self-efficacy to posttest 1 of 12.4 points, and an increase in posttest 1 to posttest 2 of 9.4 points. The results of observing student motivation at the pretest to posttest stage were 10.8 points, and a significant increase from the results of posttest 1 to posttest 2 was 23.6 points. The research findings are that the mind mapping model increases student self-efficacy, increases student motivation, and has significant advantages for elementary school students. An interesting finding is that students' mentality can be more stable with the application of mind mapping, with indications of independence, initiative, courage, and a change in perception of mathematics.
References
Akamatsu, D., & Gherghel, C. (2021). The Bright and Dark Sides of Emotional Intelligence: Implications for Educational Practice and Better Understanding of Empathy. International Journal of Emotional Education, 13(1), 3–19. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/76521.
Akanbi, A. O., Olayinka, Y. W., Omosewo, E. O., & Mohammed, R. E. (2021). Effect of Mind Mapping Instructional Strategy on Students’ Retention in Physics in Senior Secondary Schools. Anatolian Journal of Education, 6(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2021.6112a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2021.6112a
Bans-akutey, A., Afriyie, E. O., & Tiimub, B. M. (2022). Leadership Propositions for Team Success. January, 0–7. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27768180.
Beisiegel, M., Gibbons, C., & Rist, A. (2019). Examining Obstacles To Mathematics Gradu Ate Students. 490–496. https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10207689.
Berlin, R., Youngs, P., & Cohen, J. (2021). How Elementary Teaching Candidates’ Learning Opportunities Are Associated with Their Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, and Beliefs. Teachers College Record, 123(7), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812112300702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812112300702
Carroll, H. C. M. T. (2020). The relative effect of pupil absenteeism on literacy and numeracy in the primary school. Educational Studies, 00(00), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1793302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1793302
Coskun, S. D. (2020). Pre-Service Elementary Teachers’ Knowledge of Students: The Case of Subtraction. Acta Educationis Generalis, 10(3), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2020-0025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2020-0025
Cropp, I. (2017). Using peer mentoring to reduce mathematical anxiety. Research Papers in Education, 32(4), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1318808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1318808
Damayanti, R. R., Sumantri, M. S., Dhieni, N., & Karnadi, K. (2021). Guru sebagai Agen of Change dalam Pendidikan Anak. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(2), 960–976. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i2.1602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i2.1602
Dawson, V., & Shand, J. (2019). Impact of support for preservice teachers placed in disadvantaged schools. Issues in Educational Research, 29(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/ 10.3316/informit.171689901989641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.84.5
Eriany, P., & Ningrum, A. J. (2013). Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengarubi Motivasi Mu Menyekolahkan Anak Di Homeschooling Kak Seto Semarang. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 12(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.24167/psiko.v12i1.38.
Gavens, N., Doignon-Camus, N., Chaillou, A. C., Zeitler, A., & Popa-Roch, M. (2020). Effectiveness of mind mapping for learning in a real educational setting. Journal of Experimental Education, 90(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1848765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1848765
Gündüzalp, C. (2023). Using the Mind Mapping Method in Web-Based Teaching: Pre-Service Teachers' Metacognitive Learning Strategies and Self-Directed Learning Skills. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 16(1), 218-241. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1162929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1162929
Gunuc, S., Artun, H., Yigit, E., & Keser, H. (2022). Examining the Relationship Between Student Engagement and Campus Climate: A Case in Turkey. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 23(4), 1099–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025119894579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025119894579
Hargreaves, E. (2019). Feeling Less than Other People: Attainment Scores as Symbols of Children’s Worth. FORUM, 61 (1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.15730/forum.2019.61.1.53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15730/forum.2019.61.1.53
Hariyadi, S., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Ibrohim, S. (2018). Contribution of mind mapping, summarizing, and Questioning in the RQA learning model to genetic learning outcomes. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10222a.
Herrenkohl, L. R., Napolitan, K., Herrenkohl, T. I., Kazemi, E., McAuley, L., & Phelps, D. (2019). Navigating fragility and building resilience: A school–university partnership to support the development of a full-service community school. Teachers College Record, 121(12), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912101203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912101203
Ishak, N. H. F. B., Yusoff, N. F. B. M., & Madihie, A. (2020). Resilience in mathematics, academic resilience, or mathematical resilience?: An overview. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5 A), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081905
Jaffe, E. (2020). Mindset in the Classroom: Changing the Way Students See Themselves in Mathematics and Beyond. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 93(5), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2020.1802215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2020.1802215
Kalil, A., Ryan, R., & Corey, M. (2012). Diverging Destinies: Maternal Education and the Developmental Gradient in Time With Children. Demography, 49(4), 1361–1383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0129-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0129-5
Kapofu, L. K., & Kapofu, W. (2020). “This Maths is better than that Maths” – Exploring Learner Perceptions on the Integration of History of Mathematics in Teaching the Theorem of Pythagoras: A Case Study. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0604. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8446
Kaskens, J., Segers, E., Goei, S. L., van Luit, J. E., & Verhoeven, L. (2023). Dynamic Mathematics Interviews in Primary Education: The Relationship Between Teacher Professional Development and Mathematics Teaching. Mathematics Teacher Education & Development, 25(1), 61–80. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/handle/2066/293104.
Klemer, A., Rapoport, S., & Lev-Zamir, H. (2019). The missing link in teachers’ knowledge about common fractions division. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(8), 1256–1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1522677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1522677
Knight, D. S., & Skrtic, T. M. (2021). Cost-Effectiveness of Instructional Coaching: Implementing a Design-Based, Continuous Improvement Model to Advance Teacher Professional Development. Journal of School Leadership, 31(4), 318–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052684620972048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1052684620972048
Lechner, C. M., Gauly, B., Miyamoto, A., & Wicht, A. (2021). Stability and change in adults’ literacy and numeracy skills: Evidence from two large-scale panel studies. Personality and Individual Differences, 180(February), 110990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110990
Mani, A. (2012). Effectiveness of concept mapping and mind mapping in science teaching. TechnoLearn: An International Journal of Educational Technology, 2(1), 71-76. https://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:tle&volume=2&issue=1&article=008.
Moon-seo, S. K., Sung, J., Moore, M., & Koo, G. (2021). Important role of parenting style on college students ’ adjustment in higher education. Education Research: Theory and Practice, 32(2), 47–61. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1296527.
Muhlisin, A. (2019). Reading, mind mapping, and sharing(RMS): Innovation of new learning model on science lecture to improve understanding concepts. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.570501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.570501
Napitupulu, R. M. (2020). Dampak pandemi Covid-19 terhadap kepuasan pembelajaran jarak jauh. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 7(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v7i1.32771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v7i1.32771
Neumann, I., Jeschke, C., & Heinze, A. (2021). First Year Students’ Resilience to Cope with Mathematics Exercises in the University Mathematics Studies. Journal Fur Mathematik-Didaktik, 42(2), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-020-00177-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-020-00177-w
Novariandhini, D. A., & Latifah, M. (2012). Harga Diri, Efikasi Diri, Motivasi Belaar, dan Berprestasi Akademik Siswa Sma Pada Berbagai Model Pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga & Konsumen, 5(2), 138-146. https://doi.org/10.24156/jikk.2012.5.2.138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24156/jikk.2012.5.2.138
Nurharyanto, D. W., & Retnawati, H. (2020). The difficulties of the elementary school students in solving the mathematical narrative-type test items. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 8(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v8i1.29969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v8i1.29969
Oktay, A., Dogan, H., Özcan, Z. Ç., Dönmez, Ö., & Özdemir, H. (2021). Investigation of Academic Achievement, Self-Efficacy and Psychological Resilience of Sixth Grade Students Starting Primary School at Different Ages. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 11(1), 187-216. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1286961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2021.006
Peatfield, N. (2015). Affective aspect of mathematical resilience. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into learning Mathematics, 35(2), 70-75. https://bsrlm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/BSRLM-IP-35-2-13.pdf.
Poekert, P., Alexandrou, A., & Shannon, D. (2016). How teachers become leaders: an internationally validated theoretical model of teacher leadership development. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 21(4), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2016.1226559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2016.1226559
Polat, Ö., & Atış-Akyol, N. (2021). Mind mapping as a new method that supports readiness for primary school. Research in Pedagogy, 11(2), 431–450. https://doi.org/10.5937/istrped2102431p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/IstrPed2102431P
Polat, Ö., Sezer, T., & Atış-Akyol, N. (2022). Collaborative learning with mind mapping in the development of social skills of children. Participatory Educational Research, 9(1), 463–480. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.25.9.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.25.9.1
Polat, O., Yavuz, E. A., & Tunc, A. B. O. (2017). The effect of using mind maps on the development of maths and science skills. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(5), 32–45. https://library.iau.edu.sa/docview/1913352923?accountid=136546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v12i1.1201
Rakhmawati, Y., & Mustadi, A. (2019). Self-efficacy in Primary Schools Students as Potential Characters: From the Perspective of Students’ Self-ability and Interest. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i1.15221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i1.15221
Rakhmawati, Y., & Mustadi, A. (2021). Examining the Necessity of Reflective Module: Literacy Numeracy Skill of Students Elementary School. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(1), 597–609. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i1.534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i1.534
Saralar-Aras, İ., & Birgili, B. (2022). An Assessment of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Techno-Pedagogical Content Knowledge regarding Geometry. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 9(4), 1307–1327. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2022.9.4.920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2022.9.4.920
Sari, F. S. (2020). Pendidikan Karakter Dan Reward Dalam Menguatkan Motivasi Belajar Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Joyful Learning Journal, 9(2), 84-89. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jlj/article/download/39716/17646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jlj.v9i2.39716
Semilarski, H., Soobard, R., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2022). Expanding disciplinary and interdisciplinary core idea maps by students to promote perceived self-efficacy in learning science. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00374-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00374-8
Sezer, T., & Polat, Ö. (2022). Supporting Pre-schoolers’ Acquisition of Geometric Knowledge Through Mind Mapping. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 26(3), 86-105. https://ejrsme.icrsme.com/article/view/21488.
Stigberg, S. K., Stigberg, H., & Maugesten, M. (2022). Making Manipulatives for Mathematics Education. In 6th FabLearn Europe/MakeEd Conference 2022 (pp. 1-9). https://doi.org/10.1145/3535227.3535228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3535227.3535228
Stoehr, K. J., & Olson, A. M. (2023). Elementary prospective teachers’ visions of moving beyond mathematics anxiety. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(1), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00379-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00379-6
Store, J. C. (2018). Investigations in Mathematics Learning Grounded theory of productive practices for algebraic thinking. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 10(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2017.1375353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2017.1375353
Takaria, J., & Palinussa, A. L. (2020). Mathematical self-concept among prospective teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 799–806. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20464
Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). Students’ difficulties in mathematics problem-solving: What do they say? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8(5), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020
Transinata, T. (2018). Integrasi Pendidikan Cinta Tanah Air dalam Kurikulum Tersembunyi Berbasis Karakter Kebangsaan. PHILANTHROPY: Journal of Psychology. https://156.67.218.228/index.php/philanthropy/article/view/679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26623/philanthropy.v1i1.679
Tualaulelei, E., Burke, K., Fanshawe, M., & Cameron, C. (2022). Mapping pedagogical touchpoints: Exploring online student engagement and course design. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787421990847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787421990847
Umam, K., & Azhar, E. (2019). Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Melalui Pendekatan (Somatic, Auditory, Visual and Intellectual). JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia), 4(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v4i2.1038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v4i2.1038
Verenoze., N. G. C. M. A. de O. G. de M. (2022). European Journal of Educational Research. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v4i4.716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v4i4.716
Xiao, F., Barnard-brak, L., Lan, W., & Burley, H. (2019). Examining problem-solving skills in technology- rich environments as related to numeracy and literacy. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 38(3), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2019.1598507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2019.1598507
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Novitasari Widyastuti, Herwin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
