Kepercayaan pada Hoaks Penanganan COVID-19: Peran Dangerous Worldview dan Keyakinan Konspirasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v11i2.44488Keywords:
Dangerous Worldview, Keyakinan Konspirasi, Hoaks, COVID-19Abstract
Tersebarnya hoaks mengenai peran pemerintah dalam penanganan COVID-19 menyumbang kegelisahan di lubuk hati masyarakat. Fenomena ini memancing beragam persepsi mulai dari positif hingga negatif. Persepsi negatif menenggelamkan motivasi masyarakat untuk bertahan di era pandemi, sehingga memantik masyarakat untuk mempercayai konspirasi dan menganggap dunia adalah tempat yang mengancam (dangerous worldview). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan peran dangerous worldview dan keyakinan konspirasi sebagai anteseden kepercayaan pada hoaks mengenai pemerintah akan penanganan COVID-19. Dengan menggunakan rancangan survei cross sectional dan sampel penelitian (N = 441) yang dipilih secara accidental sampling. Dangerous worldview, keyakinan konspirasi dan kepercayaan hoaks diukur menggunakan kuesioner, sedangkan hipotesis penelitian dianalisis menggunakan regresi berganda. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa dangerous worldview dan keyakinan konspirasi berperan signifikan dalam menjelaskan kepercayaan hoaks mengenai pemerintah (R= 0,746; R2= 0,556; F= 274,536; p<0,001 ) dengan kontribusi relatif dangerous worldview dan keyakinan konspirasi masing-masing sebesar 35% dan 77%. Hasil dan implikasi penelitian dibahas secara rinci. Implikasi teoritis dari penelitian ini adalah dangerous worldview dan keyakinan konspirasi berperan sebagai anteseden atau collective symbolic coping terhadap kepercayaan hoaks mengenai pemerintah.
References
Abalakina-Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., & Gregory, L. W. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20(3), 637-647. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00160
Aaronovitch D. (2009). Voodoo Histories: The Role of the Conspiracy Theory in Shaping Modern History. London: Jonathan Cape
Balatif, R. (2021). Perang Melawan Bahaya Hoaks COVID-19 di Dunia. JIMKI: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Kedokteran Indonesia, 9(2), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.53366/jimki.v9i2.330
Bruder, M., et al. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy mentality questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1-15.
Cassam, Q. (2019). Conspiracy theories. John Wiley & Sons.
Chandra, M., & Syakurah, R. (2020). Potential use of personal protection online search during COVID-19 pandemic for predicting and monitoring public. International Journal of Public Health, 9(4), 406-413. doi: 10.11591/ijphs.v9i4.20547
Cichocka, A., Marchlewska, M., & Zavala, A. G. De. (2016). Does self-love or self-hate predict conspiracy beliefs ? Narcissism , self-esteem , and the endorsement of conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615616170
Cohen, R. & Swerdlik, M. (2005). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement, 6th edition. McGraw-Hill International.
Crowson, H. M. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation as mediators of worldview beliefs on attitudes related to the war on terror. Social Psychology, 40, 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.40.2.93
Dana, R. (2020). Analisis Perilaku Masyarakat Indonesia dalam Menghadapi Pandemi Virus Corona (Covid-19) dan Kiat Menjaga Kesejahteraan Jiwa. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v7i3.15082
Douglas, K. (2015). The negative social impact of conspiracy theories. Diambil dari https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/01/04/are-conspiracy-theories-all-bad-17/the-negative-social-impact-of-conspiracy-theories
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M, & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40, 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Dalam M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41-113. New York: Academic Press.
Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 75–93.
Dunwoody, P. T., & Funke, F. (2016). The Aggression-Submission-Conventionalism Scale: Testing a new three factor measure of authoritarianism. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(2), 571–600. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v4i2.168
Eicher, V., et al. (2014). Fundamental beliefs, origin explanations and perceived effectiveness of protection measures: Exploring laypersons’ chains of reasoning about influenza. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24, 359-375.
Fidel, R. (2012). Human Information Interaction: An Ecological Approach to Information Behavior. The MIT Press.
Franks, B., Bangerter, A., & Bauer, M. W. (2013). Conspiracy theories as quasi-religious mentality: an integrated account from cognitive science, social representations theory, and frame theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1-12.
Franks, B. et al. (2017). Beyond “monologicality”? Exploring conspiracist worldviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(861), 1-16.
Galliford, N. & Furnham, A. (2017). Individual difference factors and beliefs in medical and political conspiracy theories. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12382.
Halim, D. (2020). Ada 81 Kasus Hoaks terkait Virus Corona, Polisi Tahan 12 Tersangka. Retrieved from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/04/09/15105541/ada-81-kasus-hoaks-terkait-virus-corona-polisi-tahan-12-tersangka
Herawati, N. A. (2019). Implikasi Literasi Media dalam Mengubah Perilaku Masyarakat Kota Pontianakterhadap Kabar Bohong. Commed: Jurnal Komunikasidan Media, 3 N0.2.
Hoijer, B. (2011). Social representations theory: A new theory for media research. Nordicom Review, 32(2), 3-16.
Imhoff, R. & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (un) truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28, 25–43.
Juditha, C. (2017). Akses Pencarian Dan Penyebaran Informasi Tentang Pemerintah Bidang Komunikasi Dan Informatika oleh Masyarakat di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi dan Opini Publik, 21(1), 1–14.
Juditha, C. (2018). Interaksi Komunikasi Hoax di Media Sosial serta Antisipasinya. Jurnal Pekommas, 3 No. 1, A.
Juditha, C. (2020). Perilaku Masyarakat Terkait Penyebaran Hoaks Covid-19 People Behavior Related to The Spread Of Covid-19’s Hoax. Jurnal Pekommas, 5(2), 105-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.30818/jpkm.2020.2050201
Jolley, D. & Douglas, K. M. (2020). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one's carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1): 35-56.
KBBI Daring. (2018). Pemerintah. Diambil dari https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/
Kominfo. (2020). Penyebar Hoaks Covid-19 Diancam Sanksi Kurungan dan Denda 1 Miliar. Retrieved from https://kominfo.go.id/content/detail/25923/kominfo-penyebar-hoaks-covid-19-diancam-sanksi-kurungan-dan-denda-1-miliar/0/virus_corona
Kruglanski, A. W. (2012). Lay epistemic theory. Dalam P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology 1 (201–223). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215
Leiser, D., Duani, N., & Wagner-Egger, P. (2017). The conspiratorial style in lay economic thinking. PLoS ONE, 12(3), 1-17.
Leman, P. J. & Cinnirella, M. (2013). Beliefs in conspiracy theories and the need for cognitive closure. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(378), 1-10.
McGonagle, T. (2017). “Fake news”: False fears or real concerns? Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 35(4), 203-209.
Merriam-Webster. (2018). Definition of social media. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/social%20media
Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2015). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, doi: 10.1111/ajps.12234
Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., & Farhart, C. E. (2015). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, doi: 10.1111/ajps.12234
Moulding, R., et al. (2016). Better the devil you know than a world you don’t? Intolerance of uncertainty and worldview explanations for belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 345-354.
Nickerson, R. S. (1998), Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises, Review of General Psychology, 2(2):175-220, doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175, S2CID 8508954
Nicol, A. A. M. & Rounding, K. (2013). Alienation and empathy as mediators of the relation between Social Dominance Orientation, Right-Wing Authoritarianism and expressions of racism and sexism. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 294–299.
Oxford Dictionaries. (2018). Definition of conspiracy theory. Diambil dari https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/us/conspiracy_theory
Perbawa, I. K. S. L. P. (2021). Kebijakan Pemerintah Indonesia Dalam Menanggulangi Covid-19 Berdasarkan Instrumen Hukum Internasional. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 10(1), 197-205. Doi: 10.23887/jish-undiksha.v10i1.33517
Perry, R., Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2013). Dangerous and competitive worldviews: A meta-analysis of their associations with Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Journal of Research in Personality, 47 (116-127).
Rateau, P. et al. (2012). Social representation theory. Dalam P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. UK: SAGE.
Reichel, C. (2019). How to Combat Health Misinformation Online: A Research Roundup. Journalists Resource. Retrieved from https://journalistsresource.org/studies/society/internet/health-misinformation-debunk-facebook-twitter/
Rudiantara. (2019). Jadi Pintar Sekaligus Baik dalam Ombak Hoaks. Majalah Kominfonext.
Setiawan, T. P. (2021). Survei Online Penunjang Penelitian Praktis dan Akademis. Semarang: Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi & Komunikasi Terapan.
Sutton, R. M. & Douglas, K. M. (2014). Examining the monological nature of conspiracy theories. Dalam J. Van Prooijen & P. A. M. Van Lange (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders (pp. 237-253). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swami, V. dan Coles, R. (2010). The truth is out there: belief in conspiracy theories. The Psychologist, 23(7), 560-563. ISSN 0952-8229
Umar, E., & Hamdiah, D. (2021). Dampak Persepsi dan Stigma Masyarakat tentang Covid-19 Community Perception and Stigma about Covid-19. Faletehan Health Journal, 8(3), 203–209. www. journal.lppm-stikesfa.ac.id/ojs/index.php/FHJ
Van Hiel, A., Cornelis, I., & Roets, A. (2007). The intervening role of social worldviews in the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and social attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 21: 131-148.
Van Prooijen, J. dan Van Lange, P. A. M. (2014). The social dimension of belief in conspiracy theories. Dalam J. Van Prooijen & P. A. M. Van Lange (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders (pp. 237-253). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wagner, W., Kronberger, N., & Seifert, F. (2002). Collective symbolic coping with new technology: Knowledge, images and public discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 323-343
Wahyudiyono, W., Eko, B. R., & Trisnani, T. (2021). Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Covid-19 Pasca Pemberlakuan Pembatasan Kegiatan Masyarakat (PPKM). Jurnal Komunika, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.31504/komunika.v10i2.4484
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Annisa Zaenab Nur Fitria, Marselius Sampe Tondok
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
.png)
.png)
