MODEL MENTAL SISWA TENTANG TERMOKIMIA

Authors

  • Komang Melina Dewi Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Wayan Suja Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Dewa Ketut Sastrawidana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpk.v2i2.21165

Abstract

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan dan menjelaskan profil model mental dan faktor-faktor penyebab terbentuknya model mental alternatif siswa kelas XI tentang termokimia di SMA Negeri Bali Mandara. Penelitian ini menggunakan mixed methods jenis sekuensial. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan observasi, pemberian tes hasil belajar dua tingkat, dan wawancara. Analisis data dilakukan secara deskriptif berdasarkan hubungan antara jawaban siswa dan argumentasinya dengan melibatkan tiga level kimia. Teknik analisis data hasil wawancara meliputi tahap reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa profil model mental siswa kelas  XI tentang termokimia, meliputi 1,94 % model mental ilmiah dan 98,05% model mental alternatif, yang terdiri atas 28,19% miskonsepsi khusus dan 69,86% benar sebagian. Faktor-faktor penyebab terbentuknya model mental alternatif pada pikiran siswa, meliputi rendahnya minat belajar siswa, kurangnya pemahaman siswa tentang termokimia, kurangnya perhatian siswa ketika pembelajaran, metode mengajar yang diterapkan guru tidak mencankup tiga level kimia dan padatnya kegiatan sekolah.

Kata-kata kunci : termokimia, model mental, model mental alternatif.

Abstract

This research was aimed describe and explain the profile of the mental models and the factors that cause the formation of alternative mental models of class XI students about thermochemistry at Bali Mandara High School. This research uses a sequential type mixed methods. Data collection was carried out by observation, giving two-level learning outcomes tests, and interviews. Data analysis is carried out descriptively, based on the relationship between student answers and their arguments involving three chemical levels. The technique of analyzing data from interviews includes the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results of this research indicate that the profile of the mental model of class XI students about thermochemistry includes 1.94% of the scientific mental model and 98.05% of the alternative mental models, which consist of 28.19% special misconceptions and 69.86% are partly correct. Factors that cause the formation of alternative mental models on the minds of students, including the low interest in student learning, lack of student understanding of thermochemistry, lack of attention of students when learning, teaching methods applied by teachers do not cover three chemical levels and the density of school activities.

Key words: thermochemistry, mental models, alternative mental models.

References

Ayyildiz, Y. & Tarhan, L. 2012. The Effective Concepts on Student’s Understanding Of Chemical Reactions And Energy. Hacettepe Universitesi Journal Of Education, 1 (42: 72-83

Chandrasegaran, A. L,. F Treagust. David,. & M. Mauro. 2007. The Development of a Two-Tier Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Instumen for Evawating Secondary School Students’ Ability to Describe and Explain Chemical Reactions Using Multiple-Choice. Chemistry Education Research and Prantice. 8 (3): 293-307.

Chang, R. 2005. Kimia Dasar Konsep- Konsep Inti, Edisi Ketiga Jilid I. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Chittleborough, G. 2004. The Role of Teaching Models and Chemical Representions of the Role of Models in The Process of Sicience and The Process of Leaning. Research in Science and Technological Education. 23(2): 195-212.

Coll, R. K., & Taylor, N. (2002). Mental Models in Chemistry: Senior Chemistry Students. Mental Models of Chemical Boding. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 3(2):175-184.

Creswell, John, W. 2010. Reseach Desain Qualitative Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Lincoln: Unversity of PNerbraska.

Devetak, I., Lober, E. D., Juriservic, M., & Glzar, S. A. 2009. Comparing Slovenian Year 8 and Year 9 Elementary School Pupils Knowlodge of Electrolyte Chemistry and Their Intrinstic Motivation. Chemistry Education

Research And Practice, 10(4):281-290

Furio, C. & Calatayud, M. L. 1996. Difficulties with The Geometry and Polarity of Molecules. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(1):36-41

Handayanti, Y. Setiabudi, A., & Nahadi. 2015. Analisis Profil Model Mental Siswa SMA pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajran IPA, 1(1):107- 122.

Ibrahim, M. 2010. Seri Pembelajaran Inovatif: Konsep Miskonsepsi, dan Cara Pembelajaran. Surabaya: Usesa University Press

Jansoon, N,. Coll, R.K.,& Somsook,E. 2009. Undestending Mental Models of Dilution in Thai Students. Inernational Journal of Environmental & Science Education , 4(2):147-168.

Johnstone, A. H. 1991. Why is Science Difficult to learn? Thing are Seldom What They seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 7(2):75-83.

Liliawati, W. & Ramalis, T. R. 2008. Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Materi IPBA di SMA dengan menggunakan CRI ( Certaintly of Response Index) dalam Upaya Perbaikan Urutan Pemberian Materi IPBA pada KTSP. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 6(4):156-168..

Nafiun. 2013. Bunyi Hukum Hess Termokimia, Contoh Soal, Rumus, Pratikum, Entalpi, Kimia. Tersedia pada www.nafiun.com/2013/06/bunyi- hukum-hess-termokimia-contoh- soal.html?m=1.

Park, E. J. 2006. Student Perception and Conceptual Development as Represented by Student Mental Models of Atomic Structure. Colombus: The Ohio State University.

Sendur, G., Toprak, M., & Pekmez, E. 2010. Analyzing of Students misconception about Chemical Equilibrium. Makalah disajikan pada International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implication, Antalya (Turkey).

Suardana, I. Nyoman., Kirna, I. Made.,& Retug, I. Nyoman. 2001. Kimia Fisika 1. Singaraja: IKIP Negeri Singaraja

Sucitra, I. G. B., Suja, I. W., Muderawan, I. W., & Nurlita, F. 2016. Propil Model Metal Siswa tenang Kolerasi Struktur Model terhadap Sifat Senyawa Organik. Proseding Seminar Nasional FMIPA UNDIKSHA 2016. Singaraja. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. Tersedia pada http://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id

Sudarmo, Unggul. 2014. Kimia SMA Kelas XI K.2013. Jakarta: Erlangga

Sustina, Agustina. 2013. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Kognitif untuk Memfalisitasi Perubahan Konseptual dan Peningkatan Keterangan Berfikir Kritis Siswa pada Materi Termokimia. Skripsi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuntitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suja, I. W., & Retug, N. 2013a. Profil Konsepsi Kimia Siswa Kelas Xi di Kota Singaraja. Proseding Seminar

Nasional Riset Inovatif 1. Singaraja: Undiksha

Suja, I., & Retug, N. 2013b. Konsepsi Kimia Siswa Kelas XII di Kota Singaraja. Prosiding Seminar Nasional FMIPA UNDIKSHA III Tahun 2013

(hlm.125-133). Tersedia pada http:// ejournal.undiksha.ac.id.

Suja, I. W. 2015. Model Mental Mahasiswa Calon Guru Kimia dalam Memahami Bahan Ajar Stereokimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(2):625-638.

Suja, I. W. 2016. “Profil Model Mental Siswa Tentang Korelasi Struktur Molekul Terhadap Sifat Senyawa Organiki”. ISBN 978-602-6428-

-4. Tersedia pada http://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id (diakses tanggal 18 Juli 2018).

Sunyono, Yuanita, L., & Ibrahim, M. 2015. Supporting Students in Learning With Multiple Representation to Improve Student mental Models on Atomic Structure Concepts. Science Education International, 26(2):104-125.

Susanty, P. 2010. Profil Model Mental Siswa pada Pokok Bahasan Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elektrolit. Bandung.

Treagut, D.F, & Coll, R. K. 2003. Investigetion of Secondary School, Undergraduate, and Graduate Leaners’Mental Models of Ionic Bonding. Journal of Reseach in Science Teaching. 40(5):464-486.

Wang, C. Y. 2007. The Rol of Mental- modelling Ability, Conten Knowledge and Mental Model in General Chemistry Student’s Undestanding about Moleculer Polarity. A DisstertationPresented to the Graduate School University of Missouri- Colombia. Tersedia pada http://mospace.umsytem.edu.

Wiji., Liliasari., Sopandi, W., & Martoprawiro, M. AK., 2014. Kemampuan Berpikir Logis dan Model Mental Kimia Sekolah Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan. 33(1):147-156. Tersedia pada http://repository.upi.edu

Yuantonius. 2012. Kenali Perbedaan Reaksi Eksoterm dan Endoterm dengan mudah. Tersedia pada

https://bisakimia.com/2012/ken ali-perbedaan-reaksi- eksoterm-dan-reaksi- endoterm-dengan-mudah/.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles