Finding Matrix Concepts Based on Cognitive Load Theory On Mathematics Learning Ability to Improve Mathematics Literacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v7i2.13703Keywords:
Cognitive Load Theory, Mathematical Literacy, Vocational High School StudentsAbstract
This research aimed at improving mathematical literacy among vocational high school students. The subject was students in class X. This qualitative research used tests, observation sheets, questionnaires, and interviews. The result shows that there was a limitation in our brain to process complex contents. Therefore, according to cognitive load theory, in the studying process, the teacher should minimize intrinsic cognitive load and stimulate germane cognitive theory, thus improving students' literacy.
References
Asmara, A.S. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Kelas X Berdasarkan Kemampuan Matematika. Scholaria, Vol 7 No 2, Mei 2017: 135– 142
Baddeley Alan, (2012). Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies. Department of Psychology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Bansilal, S., & Debba , Rajan. (2012). Exploring the role of contextual attributes in a Mathematical Literacy assessment task. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16:3, 302-316.
Brombacher, A. 2007. Mathematical Literacy-A Reader. Cape Town: Bateleur Books.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293–332.
Colwell, J., Enderson, M.C. 2016. When I Hear Literacy”: Using Pre-Service Teachers' Perceptions of Mathematical Literacy to Inform Program Changes in Teacher Education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53 (2016), 63-74, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.001 0742-051X/Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Cowan, N. 2001. The Magical Number 4 in Short-Term Memory: A Reconsideration of Mental Storage Capacity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences. 24, 87-114.
Dahar, Ratna wilis. (2006). Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Damayanti, F. (2013). Pembelajaran Berbantuan Multimedia Berdasarkan teori Beban Kognitif untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Masalah Program Linear Siswa X TKR 1 SMKN 1 Doko. Jurnal Pendidika sains, volume 1, nomor 2, Juni 2013. 133-140.
De Lange, I. (2003). Mathematics for literacy. In M. Niss (Ed.), Quantitative literacy and mathematical competencies (pp. 75-89). Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
Driscoll, M.P. (2005). Psychology of Learning for Instruction. (pp. 384-407; Ch. 11 – Constructivism). Toronto, ON: Pearson.
Fitriyah, N.R., Setianingsih, R. (2014). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran PBI (Problem Based Instruction) Dengan Mempertimbangkan Teori Beban Kognitif pada Materi Garis Singgung Persekutuan Dua Lingkaran di Kelas VIII-F Smp Negeri 1 Pasuruan. MATHEdunesa Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika. Volume 3 No 2 Tahun 2014.
Garnasih, Tuti., Hidayat, Topik., Rahmat, Adi. (2015). Menurunkan Beban kognitif Instrinsik Siswa MA dalam Pembelajaran Klasifikasi Spermatophyta menggunakan Tayangan Video keanekaragaman Tumbuhan. Seminar Nasional XII Pendidikan Biologi UNS.
Hillman, Ann Marie. (2014). A Literature Review on Disciplinary Literacy, “How Do Secondary Teachers Apprentice Students Into Mathematical Literacy?” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 57(5) February 2014 doi :10.1002/JAAL.256 © 2013 International Reading Association (pp. 397–406).
Lawson, A.E. (1995). Science Teaching and development of Thinking. Belmant: Wadsworth.inc
JL, Higbee., & P,V, Thomas. (1999). Affective an Cognitive Factors Related to Mathematics Achievement. J. Dev. Education, 23, pp 8-16.
Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 41(2), 75-86.
Kristiana, A.I. (2015). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Matematika Berstandar NCTM Bernuansa Cognitive Load Theory untuk SMK Kelas X. Pancaran, vol 4, No 4, hal 91-98, Nopember 2015.
Moos, Daniel., Pitton, Debra. (2014). Student Teacher Chalengees: Using the Cognitive Load Theory as an Explanatory Lens. Teaching Education, 25:2, 127-141, DOI: 10.1080/10476210.2012.754869.
Moreno, R. (2006). Decreasing Cognitive Load for Novice Students: Effects of Explanatory versus Corrective Feedback in Discovery-Based Multimedia. Instructional Science, 32 (1): 99-113.
Moreno, R. & Park, B. (2010). Cognitive Load Theory: Historical Development and Relation to Other Theories. Dalam Plass, J.L., Moreno R., & Brünken, R. (Eds.), Cognitive Load Theory (hlm. 9-28). Cambridge: Cambride University Press.
Nursit, Isbadar. (2015). Pembelajaran matematika menggunakan Metode Discovery Berdasarkan Teori Beban Kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol.1 (42-52).
OECD. (2014). “PISA 2012” Results: What Students Know and Can Do”. OECD Publications, vol.1. (Februari 2014:5-61).
Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. G. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 51–71.
Plass, J. L., Moreno, R., & Brunken, R. (2010). Cognitive Load Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sinead, Breen., Joan, Cleary., & Ann, O'Shea. (2009). An investigation of the mathematical literacy of first year third-level students in the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40:2, 229-246, DOI: 10.1080/00207390802566915.
Steen, L & Turner, R. (2007). Developing Mathematical Literacy. In Blum, W., Galbraith, p., Henn, HW, & Niss, M (Eds), Modeling and Aplication in Mathematics education-The 14th ICMY Study (pp285-294). New York: Springer.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1991). Evidence of cognitive theory. Cognition & Instruction, 8,351–362.
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why Some Material is Difficult to Learn? Cognition and Instruction, 12(3), 185-233.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., and Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. ISBN 978-1-4419-8125-7 e-ISBN 978-1-4419-8126-4, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4, Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London.
Sweller, J., Paas, Fred. (2012). An Evolutionary Upgrade of Cognitive Load Theory: Using the Human Motor System and Collaboration to Support the Learning of Complex Cognitive Tasks. Educ Psychol Rev (2012) 24:27–45. DOI 10.1007/s10648-011-9179-2
Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational psychology review, 17(2), 147-17.
Verhoeven, L., Schnotz, W., & Paas, F. (2009). Cognitive load in interactive knowledge construction. Learning and Instruction, 19, 369–375.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
