Inquiry Training Learning Model Assisted by Google Classroom to Improve Creative Thinking Skills of Senior High School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v8i2.17339Keywords:
Creative Thinking, Google Classroom, Inquiry TrainingAbstract
This study aimed at determining the effect of the inquiry training learning model assisted by Google Classroom in improving students' creative thinking skills. This research was quasi-experimental. Total samples were 32 students of SMAN 1 Banguntapan. The instrument test was essay test to measure the creative thinking skills. The first step of study was the given the pretest, then face-to-face learning and online learning at the time agreed upon with students. The final stage was carried out posttest to see the achievement of score after treatment. The results showed that the gain scores of creative thinking skill in students are categorized into three, namely: 62% of students with low category gain scores, 31% of students with moderate category gain scores, and 7% of students with high category gain scores. The average score of gain of creative thinking ability was 0.3 which was in the medium category. Based on these results, further research is needed with an emphasis on optimizing the use of Google Classroom and confirming knowledge construction in face-to-face learning.
References
Bakir, S., & Öztekin, E. (2014). Creative thinking levels of preservice science teachers in terms of different variables. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(2), 231–242.
Bazelais, P., & Doleck, T. (2018). Blended learning and traditional learning: A comparative study of college mechanics courses. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2889–2900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9748-9
Bell, B. K. (2015). Teacher ’ s Guide to Google’s Classroom. Shake Up Learning, LLC, 1–45.
Cavus, N., & Alhih, M. S. (2014). Learning Management Systems Use in Science Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 517–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.429.
Chaudhari, P. (2015). A Study of Effectiveness of Inquiry Training Model for Teaching Science to Standard VIII Student of Vadodara City. Horizons of Holistic Education, 2(September), 222–232.
Classroom, G. (2018). Classroom Help: About Google Classroom. Retrieved from https://support.ggogle.com/edu/classrooom/answer/6020279?h1=en&ref_topic=7175444
Corazza, G. E. (2016). Multidisciplinary Contributions to the Science of Creative Thinking. (S. Agnoli, Ed.). Singapore: Springer.
Derlina, & Nst, L. A. (2016). Efek Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Training Berbantuan Media Visual Dan Kreativitas Creativity-Assisted Inquiry Training Learning Model on Students ’ Science Process Skills. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 15(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v15i2.8080
Dicicco, K. M. (2016). Rowan Digital Works The effects of Google Classroom on teaching social studies for students with learning disabilities. Retrieved from http://rdw.rowan.edu/etd
Erlinda, N. (2016). Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Inkuiri Disertai Handout: Dampak Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa SMAN 1 Batang Anai Padang Pariaman. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 5(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v5i2.122
Hanni, I. U., Muslim, Hasanah, L., & Samsudin, A. (2018). K-11 students’ creative thinking ability on static fluid: A case study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 0–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012034
Harahap, R., Motlan, & Siregar, N. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Training Berbantuan Mind Map Terhadap Pengetahuan Konseptual dan Keterampilan Proses Sains (KPS) Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 76–81. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jpf
Hosnan, M. (2016). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21: Kunci Sukses Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google classroom: what works and how? Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201344328
Klieger, A., & Sherman, G. (2015). Physics textbooks: Do they promote or inhibit students’ creative thinking. Physics Education, 50(3), 305–309. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/50/3/305
Lalima, & Lata Dangwal, K. (2017). Blended Learning: An Innovative Approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050116
Malik, A., Setiawan, A., Suhandi, A., & Permanasari, A. (2017). Enhancing pre-service physics teachers’ creative thinking skills through HOT lab design. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(August). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995177
McKagan, S., Sayre, E., & Madsen, A. (2017). Normalized gain: What is it and when and how should I use it? Retrieved February 3, 2019, from https://www.physport.org/recommendations/Entry.cfm?ID=93334
Nurcahyanto, E., & Supahar. (2015). Development of STEM-Based Performance Assessment in Physics Learning for Student’s Creative Thinking Skill. Proceeding of International Seminar on Science Education, Yogyakarta State University.
Sandika, B., & Fitrihidajati, H. (2018). Improving creative thinking skills and scientific attitude through inquiry-based learning in basic biology lecture toward students of biology education. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i1.5326
Suparno, P. (2013). Metodologi Pembelajaran Fisika Konstruktivistik dan Menyenangkan: Edisi Revisi (Kedua). Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta.
Thompson, T. (2017). Teaching Creativity Through Inquiry Science. Gifted Child Today, 40(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217516675863
Turnip, B., Wahyuni, I., & Tanjung, Y. I. (2016). The Effect of Inquiry Training Learning Model Based on Just in Time Teaching for Problem Solving Skill. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 177–181. Retrieved from https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/30888
Wibowo, A., & Laksono, E. W. (2015). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Perangkat Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Inquiry. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(2), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v1i2.7492
Wijaya, A. (2016). Analysis of factors affecting the use of google classroom to support lectures. The 5th International Conference on Information Technology and Engineering Application, (February), 61–68. Retrieved from http://eprints.binadarma.ac.id/2777/
Yusnaeni, Y., Corebima, A. D., SUsilo, H., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Creative Thinking of Low Academic Student Undergoing Search Solve Create and Share Learning Integrated with Metacognitive Strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 10 No. 2, 245–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10216a
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
