Developing Early Childhood Cognitive Aspects Based on Anderson And Krathwohl’s Taxonomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v8i2.19481Keywords:
cognitive domain, early childhood, Anderson dan Krathwohl’s taxonomyAbstract
Developing cognitive learning objectives becomes prior needs to be prepared by teachers. The aspect of early childhood education includes language development, physical-motor, cognitive, socio-emotional, religious-morality, and art. The development of cognitive aspects becomes very important in efforts to develop lesson planning, learning materials, and assessment. This study aims to produce instructional media on cognitive aspects that are appropriate to the characteristics of early childhood education. The instructional media was developed using the research and development design with Rowntree model. The Rowntree development model consists of 3 phases, those are planning phase, development phase, and the evaluation phase. The study was conducted involving 10 early childhood education institutions in Ngada Regency, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Data was collected by documenting the learning process and utilizing rubrics for assessing the development of cognitive domain. The data were analyzed using descriptive analysis to describe the quality of the products on cognitive domain in early childhood education. The results showed that the development of cognitive aspects in early childhood learning consisted of three aspects, namely aspects of learning and problem solving, aspects of logical thinking, and aspects of symbolic thinking. The development of cognitive aspects in early childhood education for children aged 5-6 years based on Anderson and Krathwohl's Taxonomy produced 18 learning objectives. On the other hand, the development of cognitive aspects in early childhood education aged 4-5 years based on the taxonomy of Anderson and Krathwohl produced 15 learning objectives. The learning objectives of the results of the development had been examined by instructional content experts, instructional design experts, and product user. The test results in the cognitive aspects of learning objectives are in the "very good" category.
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Arends, R. I. (2013). Learning how to teach (9th Ed). Boston: McGraw Hill.
Bergen, D. (2018). Cognitive development in play-based learning. Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development, 1-4.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington: National Academy Press.
Carson, V., Hunter, S., Kuzik, N., Wiebe, S.A., Spence, J.C., Friedman, A., Tremblay, M.S., Slater, L., & Hinkley, T. (2015). Systematic review of physical activity and cognitive development in early childhood. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 1-7
Effendi, R. (2017). Konsep revisi taksonomi Bloom dan implementasinya pada pelajaran matematika SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2 (1), 72-78.
Filtri, H., & Sembiring, A.K. (2018). Perkembangan kognitif anak usia 5-6 tahun di tinjau dari tingkat pendidikan ibu di PAUD kasih ibu kecamatan rumbai, PAUD Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 1(2), 169-178.
Hoque, M. E. (2017). Three domain of learning: Cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. The Journal of EFL Education and Research, 2(2), 45-52.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (Kemendikbud). (2014). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan nomor 137 tahun 2014 tentang standar nasional pendidikan anak usia dini. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (Kemendikbud). (2014). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan nomor 146 tahun 2014 tentang kurikulum 2013 pendidikan anak usia dini. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Krogh, S. L., & Morehouase, P. (2014). The early childhood curriculum: Inquiry learning through integration. Washington: Routledge.
Krogh, S. L., & Slentz, K. L. (2010). Early childhood education: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Washington: Taylor & Francis.
Laksana, D. N. L. (2017). The effectiveness of inquiry based learning for natural science learning in elementary school. Journal of Education Technology. 1(1), 1-5.
Muga, W., Oje, M.S., & Laksana, D.N.L. (2018). Hasil belajar kognitif siswa SD dalam pembelajaran kontekstual media mazi (studi pada siswa SD kelas tinggi). Journal of Education Technology, 2(1), 20-25.
Novitasari, Y. (2018). Analisis permasalahan perkembangan kognitif anak usia dini. PAUD Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 2(1), 82-90.
Pancaningrum, N. (2016). Strategi pembelajaran: Taksonomi bloom dalam games simulation method di tingkat raudhatul athfal. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Guru Raudhatul Athfal, 4(1), 112-129.
Pertiwi, N. L. S. A., Arini, N. W., & Widiana, I. W., (2016). Analisis tes formatif bahasa Indonesia kelas IV ditinjau dari taksonomi Bloom revisi. e-Journal PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 4(1), 1-11.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (2019). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.
Rohmah, N., & Waluyo, E. (2014). Arithmetic dice media as counting concept introduction media in early childhood setting. Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Education Studies, 3(2), 127-133.
Sarjono. (2016). Pengembangan soal fisika SMA/MA Politomus Berbasis Taksonomi Bloom Revisi. Jurnal Madaniyah, 1(10), 1-16.
Selmi, A. M., Gallagher, R. J., & Mora-Flores, E. R. (2014). Early childhood curriculum for all learner: Integrating play and literacy activities. New York: Sage Publications.
Tomar, R., & Kumari, A. (2017). Cognitive development of children in private franchise preschool. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, 8(2), 15494-15499
Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Wahyuni, S. (2017). Development test system based on linear equations two variable revised taxonomy Bloom to measure high order thinking skills at student class VIII SMPN Sungguminasa Gowa. Jurnal Daya Matematis, 5(1), 129-152
Webb, D.L., Metha, A., & Jordan, K.F. (2010). Foundations of American Education, 6th Ed. New Jersey: Merill.
Widiana, I. W., & Jampel, I. N. (2016). Improving students' creative thinking and achievement through the implementation of multiple intelligence approach with mind mapping. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 5(3), 246-254.
Widiana, I. W., Bayu, G. W., & Jayanta, I. N. L. (2017). Pembelajaran berbasis otak (brain based learning), gaya kognitif kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan hasil belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(1), 1-15.
Winarni, D.S. (2017). Analisis kesulitan guru PAUD dalam membelajarakan IPA pada anak usia dini. EduSains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, 5(1), 12-22.
Zeng, N., Ayyub, M., Sun, H., Wen, X., Xiang, P., & Gao, Z. (2017). Effects of physical activity on motor skills and cognitive development in early childhood: A systematic review. BioMed Research International, 1-13.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
