Comparation of Learning Outcomes Based on Identity Statuses

Authors

  • Zuvyati Aryani Tlonaen Universitas Kristen Artha Wacana
  • Aniq Hudiyah Bil Haq Universitas Kristen Artha Wacana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v11i1.34993

Keywords:

Comparation, learning outcomes, identity status

Abstract

Identity status is a categorization of self-identity that helps a person to make choices based on the results of exploration and commitment. Learning outcomes vary for each students. Some students achieve excellent grade, others are average or even poor. Identity status may haveaneffecton students’ learning outcomes. This study aims to compare students' learning outcomes based on their identity statuses. This research used a quantitative approach. To examine the hypothesis, researchers used the one-way ANOVA test to answer the research question about a significant difference between students' learning outcomes and their identity status. The samples were 74 third semester students from the English Education Study Program. Data for identity statuses were obtained using a questionnaire with 40 statements. Data for learning outcomes were obtained from final semester test scores. ANOVA test result indicated a significant difference between students' learning outcomes and their identity status. Thus, this study proved that there is a difference between learning outcomes based on identity Status. Therefore, it is vital to know the students' identity status to improve student learning outcomes. Students with a diffusion identity status are in a serious problem. Teachers must find a solution so that their identity status can develop towards a high identity status.

References

Adjii, K. (2019). Instrumen penilaian kedisiplinan siswa sekolah menengah kejuruan. Assessment and Research on Education, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.33292/arisen.v1i1.19.

Alhefnawi, M. A. M. (2021). Assessing the efficacy of online handouts and active lectures in learning outcomes at the engineering undergraduate level. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.02.012.

Alvarez, A., Teeters, L. P., Hamm-Rodríguez, M., & Dimidjian, S. (2021). Understanding children’s funds of identity as learners through multimodal self-expressions in Mexico City. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100513.

Anthonysamy, L., Koo, A. C., & Hew, S. H. (2020). Self-regulated learning strategies and non-academic outcomes in higher education blended learning environments: A one decade review. Education and Information Technologies, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10134-2.

Arnold, M. E. (2017). Supporting Adolescent Exploration and Commitment: Identity Formation, Thriving, and Positive Youth Development. Journal of Youth Development, 12(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2017.522.

Batlolona, J. R., & Mahapoonyanont, N. (2019). Academic Learning Outcome And Creative Thinking Skills On Projectile Motion Topic. JPI, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v8i1.14524.

Blegur, J., Tlonaen, Z. A., Lumba, A. J. F., & Leko, J. J. (2021). The Importance of Self-Esteem to Students Learning Responsibilities and Group Learning Commitment of Physical Education Students. Journal of Education, Teaching, and Learning, 6(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v6i1.2355.

Blegur, J. (2020). Soft skills untuk prestasi belajar: Disiplin, percaya diri, konsep diri akademik, penetapan tujuan, tanggung jawab, komitmen, kontrol diri. Scopindo Media Pustaka.

Blesia, J. U., Iek, M., Ratang, W., & Hutajulu, H. (2021). Developing an Entrepreneurship Model to Increase Students’ Entrepreneurial Skills: an Action Research Project in a Higher Education Institution in Indonesia. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 34(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-019-09506-8.

Chen, J. L., & Mensah, F. M. (2018). Teaching Contexts That Influence Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Teacher and Science Teacher Identity Development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(5), 420–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1469187.

Chua, Y. P., & Don, Z. M. (2013). Effects of computer-based educational achievement test on test performance and test takers’ motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.008.

Denney, S. M. (2021). Student perceptions of support for civic identity development and identity exploration in a discussion-based U.S. government course. The Journal of Social Studies Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2021.06.003.

Fitriani. (2017). Student Commitment to do Lecture Task Observedfrom Motivation to Achievement. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 66, 176–180. https://doi.org/10.2991/yicemap-17.2017.30.

Friantary, H., & Martina, F. (2018). Evaluasi Implementasi Penilaian Hasil Belajar Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013 oleh Guru Bahasa Inggris dan Bahasa Indonesia di MTS Ja-Alhaq Kota Bengkulu. Silampari Bisa: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Daerah, Dan Asing, 1(2), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.31540/silamparibisa.v1i2.202.

Hagenauer, G., Gläser-Zikuda, M., & Moschner, B. (2018). University students’ emotions, life-satisfaction and study commitment: a self-determination theoretical perspective. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(6), 808–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1323189.

Hejazi, E., Shahraray, M., Farsinejad, M., & Asgary, A. (2009). Identity styles and academic achievement: mediating role of academic self-efficacy. Social Psychology of Education, 12(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11218-008-9067-X.

Huda, A. K., Reffiane, F., & Untari, M. F. asri. (2019). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Tebak Kata Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa Siswa Kelas III SD Negeri Rejosari 03 Kota Semarang. Malih Peddas (Majalah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar), 8(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.26877/malihpeddas.v8i2.3072.

Huhtala, M., Lämsä, A.-M., & Feldt, T. (2019). Applying the Identity Status Paradigm to Managers’ Moral Identity. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.50.

Kazu, İ. Y., & İş, A. (2018). An Investigation About Actualization Levels of Learning Outcomes in Early Childhood Curriculum. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(3), 66. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i3.2928.

Korpershoek, H. (2016). Relationship Among Motivation, Commitment, Cognitive Capacities and Achievement in Secondary Education. Frontline Learning Research, 4(3), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i3.182.

Kroger, J., & Marcia, J. (2011). The identity statuses: Origin, meanings, and interpretations. In & V. L. V. (eds) S.J.Schwartz, K. Luyckx (Ed.), Handbood of identity theory and research (pp. 32–53). Springer.

Kunnen, E. S., & Metz, M. (2015). Commitment and Exploration: The Need for A Developmental Approach. In K. C. M. & M. S. (Eds.) (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of identity development (pp. 115–131). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199936564.001.0001.

Mahajan, M., & Singh, M. K. S. (2017). Importance and Benefits of Learning Outcomes. Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS)., 22(3), 65–67. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2203056567.

Maman, M., & Rajab, A. A. (2016). The Implementation of Cooperative Learning Model ‘Number Heads Together (NHT)’ in Improving the Students’ Ability in Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 5(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v5i2.4536.

Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551. https://doi.org/10.30595/dinamika.v7i2.929.

Mardiana. (2019). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Model Think Pair and Share Pada Kelas VIII.5 SMP Negeri 2 Bangkinang Kota Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 3(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v3i1.199.

Meulemeester, C. De, Lowyck, B., Vermote, R., & Verhaest, Y. (2017). Mentalizing and interpersonal problems in borderline personality disorder: The mediating role of identity diffusion. Psychiatry Research, 258.

Muhammad, H. M. (2018). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Tebak Kata Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pada Tema 7 “Indahnya Keragaman Di Negeriku” Siswa Kelas Iv. Mimbar Ilmu, 23(3), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v23i3.16436.

Mutttaqin, D., & Ekowarni, E. (2016). Pembentikan Identitas Remaja di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Psikologi, 4(3), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.12338.

Novitasari, K. T., Hidayati, F., & Setyowati, R. (2020). Relationship between Social Support and Commitment to the Task with Academic Flow to Students. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan & Konseling, 6(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.26858/jppk.v6i1.10792.

Nurlia, Hala, Muchtar, Jumadi, & Taiyeb. (2017). Hubungan Antara Gaya Belajar, Kemandirian Belajar, Dan Minat Belajar Dengan Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v6i2.6552.

Olga, S., Irina, S., Andrey, C., & Venera, M. (2020). Research and assessment of the level of self-determination of the student’s personality for future professional activity. E3S Web of Conferences, 210. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021019031.

Oyserman, D., O’Donnell, S. C., Sorensen, N., & Wingert, K. M. (2021). Process matters: Teachers benefit their classrooms and students when they deliver an identity-based motivation intervention with fidelity. Contemporary Educational Psycholog, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101993.

Penner, F., Gambin, M., & Sharp, C. (2019). Childhood maltreatment and identity diffusion among inpatient adolescents: The role of reflective function. Journal of Adolescence, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.08.002.

Pop, E.I., Negru-Subtirica, O., Crocetti, E., Opre, A., & Meeus, W. (2016). On The Interplay Between Academic Achievement and Eduational Identity: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Adolescence, 47(2016), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.11.004.

Pratama, F., Firman, & Neviyarni. (2019). Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar IPA Siswa Terhadap Hasil Belajar Di Sekolah Dasar Negeri 01. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(3), 280–286. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v1i3.63.

Purnamasari, N., Siswanto, S., & Malik, S. (2020). E-module as an emergency-innovated learning source during the Covid-19 outbreak. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v3i1.53.

Ristanti, F. F., & Arianto, F. (2019). Flash Card Media Utilization To Improve Student Activity and Learning Outcomes of Fauna Distribution Subtopic in Class Xi Ips I Sma Xin Zhong Surabaya. Geosfera Indonesia, 4(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.19184/geosi.v4i2.9968.

Saprudin, S., Liliasari, L., Setiawan, A., & Prihatmanto, A. (2020). Optical Gamification (OG); Serial Versus Random Model to Improve Pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Concept Mastery. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(9), 39–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i09.11779.

Sorouphim, K.M., & Issa, N. (2020). Investigating Identity Statuses Among Labanese Youth: Relation with Gender and Academic Achievement. Youth and Society, 52(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X17732355.

Sriyanti, I., Almafie, M. R., Marlina, L., & Jauhari, J. (2021). The effect of Using Flipbook-Based E-modules on Student Learning Outcomes. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 3(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v3i2.156.

Subagia, I. W., & Wiratma, I. G. L. (2016). Profil Penilaian Hasil Belajar Siswa Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 5(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v5i1.8293.

Subaryana. (2015). Konsep Diri dan Prestasi Belajar. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan Dasar, 7(2), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.30595/dinamika.v7i2.929.

Sznitman, G.A., Zimmermann, G., & Petegem, S. V. (2019). Further insight into adolescent personal identity statuses: Differences based on self-esteem, family climate, and family communication. Journal of Adolescence, 71, 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.01.003.

Tanudjaya, C. P., & Doorman, M. (2020). Examining higher order thinking in Indonesian lower secondary mathematics classrooms. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.11000.277-300.

Tlonaen, A. Z., Dharma, B., & Mustofa, A. (2018). Investigating students’ identity statuses through short memoirs. Proceeding Icon-ELite, 281–286.

Valdez, J. P. M., Datu, J. A. D., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Gratitude intervention optimizes effective learning outcomes in Filipino high school students: A mixed-methods study. Computers & Education, 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104268.

Wildan, W. (2017). Pelaksanaan Penilaian Autentik Aspek Pengetahuan, Sikap Dan Keterampilan Di Sekolah Atau Madrasah. Jurnal Tatsqif, 15(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v15i2.3.

Yamin, M., Saputra, A., & Deswila, N. (2020). Enhancing Critical Thinking in Analyzing Short Story “The Lazy Jack” Viewed from Identity Theory. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 3(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v3i1.9948.

Yuan, R., & Mak, P. (2018). Reflective learning and identity construction in practice, discourse and activity: Experiences of pre-service language teachers in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.009.

Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher Self-Efficacy and Its Effects on Classroom Processes, Student Academic Adjustment, and Teacher Well-Being. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-26

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)