Evaluation of Implementation Policy on Management of School Operational Fund (BOS) 2019 with Edward III Model

Authors

  • Ary Rokhadiyati Magister Manajemen Pendidikan, UKSW, Salatiga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v53i1.24625

Keywords:

School Operational Assistance, manajemen, Edward III Model

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the management of the School Operational Assistance (BOS) year 2019 at the Department of Education Culture Youth and Sport Semarang Regency. This is an evaluation research. Data were collected using documents study techniques, observation, and in-depth interviews. Data are validated by source and triangulation techniques. This study uses mixed method to get the whole pictures of the informant sources. What new about this research is that the data analysis technique uses the Edward III Model that looks at the factors of communication, resources, disposition and bureaucratic structure. The result of this study shows that implementation of School Operational Assistance (BOS) year 2019 is carried out in accordance with guidelines made by the government. The four aspects are all in very good categories. For communication aspect is in very good category because it gets 10 out of 12 points or 83 %. For Resources aspect is in very good category as well for its score is 16 out of 20 points or 80%. While for Disposition aspect is in very good category because it gets 17 out of 20 points or 85%. For the last aspect which is bureaucratic structure gets the highest points as it gets 8 out of 8 points or 100 %. Although the results are all very good, it still needs a little improvement on communication aspect especially on consistency factor since the guidelines has been revised for three times. Resources aspect on human resources quantity in BOS management team for there is only two persons managing 601 schools in Semarang Regency and also on disposition aspect because there is no incentive and award for the BOS management team. These results bring implication that the Department of Education in Semarang Regency can make improvement on the aspects which do not get maximal score and the for others Education Department in other Regencies or cities can learn from this research to manage BOS in better ways.

References

Afifudin & Beni Ahmad Saebani.2009 Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, (Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia), hlm 134

CIPE. 2012. (Center for International Private Enterprise and Global Integrity); Improving Public Governance, Closing the Implementation Gap Between Law and Practice

Creswell, John W. 2010. Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed.Yogyakarta:Pustaka Pelajar.

Gunawan, Imam. 2014. Metode Penelitian Teori dan Praktik, (Jakarta: Bumi Aksara), hlm 160

Iskandar. 2009.Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sosial (Kuantitatif & Kualitatif), (Jakarta: GP Press) hlm.230-231.

Kaswandi. 2015. Evaluasi Pengelolaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah di SD Negeri 027 Tarakan. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Pengembangan Pendidikan. Vol.3 No.1: 66-74. Pengawas Dinas Pendidikan Tarakan.

Moloeng, Lexy J. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, (Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya).

Majid, Latief Abdul & Jamil. 2015. Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Utilitas. Vol. No.1:36-102.FKIP. Universitas Muhammadiyah

Neolaka, Amos. 2014. Metode Penelitian dan Statistika, (Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014), hlm 22

Setiawan, Guntur. 2004. Implementasi Dalam Birokrasi Pembangunan. Jakarta: Cipta Dunia

Silele, Erdiani dkk. 2017. Evaluasi Pengelolaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) (Studi Kasus Pada SD Inpres 4 Desa Akediri Kecamatan Jailolo Kabupaten Halmahera Barat). Jurnal EMBA. Vol. 5 No.2: 1626-1635. FEB.Universitas Samratulangi

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2013.Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2013), hlm 172

Sulistyaningrum, Eny. 2016. Impact Evaluation of the School Operational Assistance Program (BOS) using the Matching Method, Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business Volume 31, Number 1, , 33 – 62

Sugiyono, 2010.Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Bandung: Alfabeta, 2010), hlm. 338

Wahab, Abdul, Solichin. 2008. Analisis Kebijaksanaan, Dari Formulasi Ke Implementasi Kebijaksanaan Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Widyatmoko, Subkhi & Suyatmini. 2017. Pengelolaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah di SD Kemasan 1 Surakarta. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan. Vol.12 No.2: 153-160. Magister Administrasi Pendidikan Sekolah. UMS.

Winarno, Budi. 2005. Kebijakan Publik (teori, proses, dan studi kasus). Yogyakarta: CAPS (Center of Academic Publising Service).

Downloads

Published

2020-05-10

How to Cite

Rokhadiyati, A. (2020). Evaluation of Implementation Policy on Management of School Operational Fund (BOS) 2019 with Edward III Model. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 53(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v53i1.24625

Issue

Vol. 53 No. 1 (2020): April

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)