E-books as Assistive Technology for Children with Learning Disabilities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v55i2.42327

Keywords:

Assistive Technology, E-book, Learning Disabilities

Abstract

The general school curriculum has not fully provided the concept of learning for children with special needs such as for children with learning disabilities. E-books are teaching materials as assistive technology, specially designed for students with learning disabilities. The aims of this study developing teaching materials in the form of e-books as learning aids for children with learning disabilities. This study is carried out base on the needs and learning styles of students. The subjects in this study consisted of expert testing and limited product user testing, in this case students. The sample selection of the test subjects was carried out by purposive sampling. Therefore, the research and development (R&D) approach was used in this study. The model developed using ADDIE. The expert validation stage is carried out on curriculum experts, media, and education practitioners. The trial was carried out on students at various levels, (1, 3, 5, and 7) with a total of 25 respondents. The data collection technique used a questionnaire with a Likert scale. The results showed that the development of assistive technology for e-books with the basic concept of art received a good response, was understandable, looked attractive, and was effective or feasible to use. Students achieve a better level of socialization, successfully achieved most of the lesson plan program goals such as motor, speech, language, reading, writing and memory development.

Author Biography

Lina Novita, Pakuan University

B

References

Anastasiou, D., Kauffman, J. M., & Di Nuovo, S. (2015). Inclusive education in Italy: description and reflections on full inclusion. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30(4), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2015.1060075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2015.1060075

Andersson, U., & Östergren, R. (2012). Number magnitude processing and basic cognitive functions in children with mathematical learning disabilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 701–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.004

Barletta, F., Yoguel, G., Pereira, M., & Rodríguez, S. (2017). Exploring scientific productivity and transfer activities: Evidence from Argentinean ICT research groups. Research Policy, 46(8), 1361–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.007

Barnes, M. A., & Fuchs, L. S. (2008). Learning disabilities. In Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics (pp. 445–466). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-04025-9.50015-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-04025-9.50015-5

Benmarrakchi, F., El Kafi, J., & Elhore, A. (2017). Communication technology for users with specific learning disabilities. Procedia Computer Science, 110, 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.06.093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.06.093

Bjekić, D., Obradović, S., Vučetić, M., & Bojović, M. (2014). E-teacher in inclusive e-education for students with specific learning disabilities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.131

Bose, B., & Heymann, J. (2020). Do inclusive education laws improve primary schooling among children with disabilities? International Journal of Educational Development, 77, 102208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102208

Cha, Y. K., Wong, S. Y., & Meyer, J. W. (1988). Values education in the curriculum: Some comparative empirical data. In The Revival of Values Education in Asia & the West (pp. 11–28). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-035853-6.50007-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-035853-6.50007-2

Dardzińska-Głębocka, A., & Zdrodowska, M. (2021). Analysis children with disabilities self-care problems based on selected data mining techniques. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 2854–2862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.056

Fayomi, O. S. I., Okokpujie, I. P., & Fayomi, G. U. (2019). An innovation concept towards bridging the gaps between teaching and research. Procedia Manufacturing, 35, 775–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.022

Fidan, T., & Oztürk, I. (2015). The relationship of the creativity of public and private school teachers to their intrinsic motivation and the school climate for innovation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 905–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.370

Florez, D., García-Duque, C. E., & Osorio, J. C. (2019). Is technology (still) applied science?. Technology in Society, 59, 101193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101193

Gucyeter, S., & Erdogan, S. C. (2020). Creative children in a robust learning environment: Perceptions of special education teacher candidates. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100675

Guille, M., Arias, B., Vicente, E., Verdugo, M. A., & Badia, M. (2016). Research in Developmental Disabilities Confirmatory factor analysis of the supports intensity scale for children. 50, 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.022

Hanik, E. U. (2020). Self Directed Learning Berbasis Literasi Digital Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Elementary: Islamic Teacher Journal, 8(1), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v8i1.7417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v8i1.7417

Hansen, L. A., & Wass, S. (2022). Enactive methods towards situational learning-engaging people with intellectual and developmental disability in design. Procedia Computer Science, 196, 598–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.054

Herman, M. S., & Shantz, C. U. (1983). Social problem solving and mother-child interactions of educable mentally retarded children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 4(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(83)90019-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(83)90019-9

Huijsmans, M. D., Kleemans, T., van der Ven, S. H., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2020). The relevance of subtyping children with mathematical learning disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 104, 103704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103704

Hukkelberg, S., Tømmerås, T., & Ogden, T. (2019). Parent training: Effects beyond conduct problems. Children and Youth Services Review, 100, 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.03.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.03.009

Isaila, N., & Nicolau, I. (2010). Promoting computer assisted learning for persons with disabilities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4497–4501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.719

Karpagavalli, S., Gripsy, J. V., & Nandhini, K. (2021). Speech assistive Tamil learning mobile applications for learning disability children. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.050

Kincaid, D. L., Doris, M., Shannon, C., & Mulholland, C. (2017). What is the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder and ASD traits in psychosis? A systematic review. Psychiatry Research, 250, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.017

Kulkarni, M. (2018). Discursive work within weak field mandate events: The case of a conference on assistive technologies for persons with disabilities. IIMB Management Review, 30(4), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2018.08.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2018.08.001

Laabidi, M., Jemni, M., Ayed, L. J. B., Brahim, H. B., & Jemaa, A. B. (2014). Learning technologies for people with disabilities. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.10.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.10.005

Lersilp, T. (2016). Assistive technology and educational services for undergraduate students with disabilities at universities in the Northern Thailand. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 36, 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.09.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.09.012

Lewandowski, L., Wood, W., & Miller, L. A. (2016). Technological applications for individuals with learning disabilities and ADHD. In Computer-assisted and web-based innovations in psychology, special education, and health (pp. 61–93). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802075-3.00003-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802075-3.00003-6

Lindström, E. R., & Lemons, C. J. (2021). Teaching reading to students with intellectual and developmental disabilities: An observation study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 115, 103990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103990

Nees, M. A., & Berry, L. F. (2013). Audio assistive technology and accommodations for students with visual impairments: Potentials and problems for delivering curricula and educational assessments. Performance Enhancement & Health, 2(3), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2013.08.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2013.08.016

Olokundun, M., Ogbari, M., Peter, F., Borishade, T., Falola, H., Salau, O., & Kehinde, O. (2018). Survey data on teaching strategies and product innovation: A focus on selected university students in Nigeria. Data in Brief, 18, 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.03.027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.03.027

Parr, M. (2012). The Future of Text-to-Speech Technology: How Long before it’s Just One More Thing we do When Teaching Reading? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1420–1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.081

Perelmutter, B., McGregor, K. K., & Gordon, K. R. (2017). Assistive technology interventions for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: An evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 114, 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.005

Pheeraphan, N. (2013). Enhancement of the 21st century skills for Thai higher education by integration of ICT in classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.346

Rapp, A., Cena, F., Castaldo, R., Keller, R., & Tirassa, M. (2018). Designing technology for spatial needs: Routines, control and social competences of people with autism. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 120, 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.07.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.07.005

Sahin, M. C. (2009). Instructional design principles for 21st century learning skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1464–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.258

Sharar, T., & Nawab, A. (2020). Teachers’ perceived teacher leadership practices: A case of private secondary schools in Lahore, Pakistan. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100049

Stein, A., Dalton, L., Rapa, E., Bluebond-Langner, M., Hanington, L., Stein, K. F., & Yousafzai, A. (2019). Communication with children and adolescents about the diagnosis of their own life-threatening condition. The Lancet, 393(10176), 1150–1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33201-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33201-X

Steruska, J., Simkova, N., & Pitner, T. (2019). Do science and technology parks improve technology transfer? Technology in Society, 59, 101127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.04.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.04.003

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Torgesen, J. K. (1991). Learning Disabilities: Historical and Conceptual Issues. In Learning About Learning Disabilities (pp. 3–37). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-762530-0.50007-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-762530-0.50007-2

Turculeţ, A. (2015). Teachers for the 21st century. Will emotional intelligence make the difference? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 990–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.188

Valtonen, T., Hoang, N., Sointu, E., Näykki, P., Virtanen, A., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., & Kukkonen, J. (2021). How pre-service teachers perceive their 21st-century skills and dispositions: A longitudinal perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106643

Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Fernández-Sánchez, M. R., Dominguez, F. I. R., & Sosa-Díaz, M. J. (2021). The educational integration of digital technologies preCovid-19: Lessons for teacher education. PLoS ONE, 16(8 August), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256283

Voinea, M., & Pălăşan, T. (2014). Teachers’ professional identity in the 21st century Romania. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.172

Wang, H., Peng, A., & Patterson, M. M. (2021). The roles of class social climate, language mindset, and emotions in predicting willingness to communicate in a foreign language. System, 99, 102529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102529

Whiting, D., Lichtenstein, P., & Fazel, S. (2021). Violence and mental disorders: a structured review of associations by individual diagnoses, risk factors, and risk assessment. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30262-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30262-5

Wu, T. F., Chen, M. C., Yeh, Y. M., Wang, H. P., & Chang, S. C. H. (2014). Is digital divide an issue for students with learning disabilities? Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.024

Zhu, Q., & Mitcham, C. (2020). Liu Zeyuan’s philosophy of engineering and technology: An introduction to his Marxist socioeconomic theory. Technology in Society, 63, 101351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101351

Downloads

Published

2022-04-08

How to Cite

Novita, L., Sundari , F. S. ., Vonti, L. H. ., & Purnamasari, R. . (2022). E-books as Assistive Technology for Children with Learning Disabilities. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 55(2), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v55i2.42327

Issue

Section

Articles