Cooperative Abilities and Cognitive Learning Outcomes: Study Group Investigation on Life Cycle Topic

Authors

  • Marleny Leasa Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Marthina Eralisa Wuarlela Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i1.56162

Keywords:

Cooperation ability, Cognitive learning outcomes, Group investigation

Abstract

The cooperative ability and cognitive learning outcomes of students in Ambon City still need to improve. The results of students learning science evidence this. The solution that can be done is to use learning models that can stimulate the development of students' cooperative and cognition abilities, one of which is group investigation. This study aims to analyze the relationship between cooperative abilities and cognitive learning outcomes in science learning with the GI cooperative model. The type of research used is correlational, with a sample of 50 people. The data collection instruments used in this study included questionnaires on students' collaboration abilities and cognitive learning outcomes test instruments—data analysis using simple linear regression. The results showed the sufficient category was the relationship between cooperative abilities and students' cognitive learning outcomes in science content learning the life cycle material with the Group Investigation type cooperative model. It was also revealed that the contribution of the cooperative ability variable to cognitive learning outcomes proves that GI contributes to students' cooperative abilities and cognitive learning outcomes.

References

Abbas, S., Umangap, W. A., Amin, A. M., Biology, T., & Ternate, I. (2023). Collaborative Group Investigation and Self Efficacy on Pre-Service Science Teachers ’ Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v11i1.26614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v11i1.26614

Aini, Z., Ramdani, A., & Raksun, A. (2018). Perbedaan Penguasaan Konsep Konsep Biologi dan kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa kelas X Pada Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation dan Guided inquiry di MAN 1 Praya. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 13(1), 19–2. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v13i1.466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v13i1.466

Albus, P., Vogt, A., & Seufert, T. (2021). Signaling in virtual reality influences learning outcomes and cognitive load. Computers and Education, 166(February), 104154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104154

Alsubaie, M. A. (2022). Distance education and the social literacy of elementary school students during the Covid-19 pandemic. Heliyon, 8(7), e09811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09811

Anja, M., Vandvik, V., Ellingsen, S., & Bianchi, C. (2023). Cooperative learning goes online : teaching and learning intervention in a digital environment impacts psychosocial outcomes in biology students. 117(December 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102114

Asmi, A., Neldi, H., & FIK-UNP, K. (2018). Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga Dan Kesehatan Melalui Metode Bermain Pada Kelas VIII-4 Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal MensSana, 3(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.24036/jm.v3i1.64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/jm.v3i1.64

Baer, J. (2003). Grouping and Achievement in Cooperative Learning. College Teaching, 51(4), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550309596434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550309596434

Baker, M. J. (2015). Collaboration in collaborative learning. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 16(3), 451–473. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.3.05bak. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.3.05bak

Batlolona, J. R., Singerin, S., & Diantoro, M. (2020). Influence of Problem-Based Learning Model on Student Mental Models. 16(June), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v16i1.14253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v16i1.14253

Bayley, S. H. (2022). Learning for adaptation and 21st-century skills: Evidence of pupils’ flexibility in Rwandan primary schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 93(March 2021), 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102642

Buchs, C., Filippou, D., Pulfrey, C., & Volpé, Y. (2017). Challenges for cooperative learning implementation: reports from elementary school teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(3), 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1321673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1321673

Candia, C., Oyarúzn, M., Landaeta, V., Yaikin, T., Monge, C., Hidalgo, C., & Rodriguez-Sickert, C. (2022). Reciprocity Heightens Academic Performance in Elementary School Students. SSRN Electronic Journal, 8(November). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4124020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4124020

Castañer, X., & Oliveira, N. (2020). Collaboration, Coordination, and Cooperation Among Organizations: Establishing the Distinctive Meanings of These Terms Through a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Management, 46(6), 965–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320901565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320901565

Damini, M. (2014). How the Group Investigation and Six-Mirror models changed teachers’ roles and teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards diversity. Intercultural Education, 25(3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2014.917794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2014.917794

Doymus, K., Simsek, U., Karaçöp, A., & Ada, S. (2008). Effects of two cooperative learning strategies on teaching and learning topics of thermochemistry. World Applied Sciences Journal, 7(1), 34–42. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Suekrue-Ada/publication/292115723_Effects_of_two_cooperative_learning_strategies_on_teaching_and_learning_topics_of_thermochemistry/links/56a8ea1308aea8dbc7048d9f/Effects-of-two-cooperative-learning-strategies-on-teaching-and-learning-topics-of-thermochemistry.pdf.

Fenanlampir, A., Leasa, M., & Batlolona, J. R. (2021). The development of homogeneity psycho cognition learning strategy in physical education learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 1047–1059. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE.V10I3.21713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21713

Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505

Hadkaew, P., & Liewkongsthaporn, W. (2016). Developing Students ’ 21 Century Skills through Project-Based Learning : Mathematics Teachers ’ Perception and Practice. SEAMEO Conferences, 20–21. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2124.8406.

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3(February), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Healy, M., Doran, J., & McCutcheon, M. (2018). Cooperative learning outcomes from cumulative group work experiences: differences in student perceptions. Accounting Education, 27(3), 286–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1476893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1476893

Hsiao, H. S., Chen, J. C., Hong, J. C., Chen, P. H., Lu, C. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2017). A five-stage prediction-observation-explanation inquiry-based learning model to improve students’ learning performance in science courses. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3393–3416. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00735a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00735a

Hsu, L. (2021). A tale of two classes: Tourism students’ cognitive loads and learning outcomes in face-to-face and online classes. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 29(July), 100342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100342

Huang, M. Y., Tu, H. Y., Wang, W. Y., Chen, J. F., Yu, Y. T., & Chou, C. C. (2017). Effects of cooperative learning and concept mapping intervention on elementary school's critical thinking and basketball skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23(101), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.01.002

Imanuel, S. A. (2015). Kesulitan Belajar IPA Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar. Vox Edukasi, 6(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31932/ve.v6i2.106.

Jones, T. R., & Burrell, S. (2022). Present in class yet absent in science: The individual and societal impact of inequitable science instruction and challenge to improve science instruction. Science Education, 106(5), 1032–1053. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21728

Kazeni, M., Baloyi, E., & Gaigher, E. (2018). Effectiveness of individual and group investigations in developing integrated science inquiry skills. South African Journal of Education, 38(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n3a1549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n3a1549

Lamb, R., Neumann, K., & Linder, K. A. (2022). Real-time prediction of science student learning outcomes using machine learning classification of hemodynamics during virtual reality and online learning sessions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3(February), 100078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100078

Liebech-Lien, B. (2021). Teacher teams – A support or a barrier to practicing cooperative learning? Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 103453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103453

Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, G., Lockyer, L., Arguel, A., & Pachman, M. (2018). Understanding Difficulties and Resulting Confusion in Learning : An Integrative Review. 3(June), pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00049

Merintika. L, S., Pratiwi, P. H., & Martiana, A. (2021). Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Group Investigation (GI) Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Investigasi Kelompok Pada Siswa Kelas XI IPS 1 SMA Negeri 11 Yogyakarta. DIMENSIA: Jurnal Kajian Sosiologi, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/dimensia.v10i1.41049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/dimensia.v10i1.41049

Segundo-Marcos, R., Carrillo, A. M., Fernández, V. L., & González, M. T. D. (2022). Development of executive functions in late childhood and the mediating role of cooperative learning: A longitudinal study. Cognitive Development, 63(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101219

Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1990). Group Investigation Expands Cooperative Learning. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 17–21. https://www.academia.edu/download/51630768/el_198912_sharan.pdf.

Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of “relevance” in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463

Sugiharto. (2020). Geographical students’ learning outcomes on basic political science by using cooperative learning model with Group Investigation (GI) type in State University of Medan, Indonesia. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 30(4), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1696261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1696261

Suhartono, Degeng, I. N. S., Suyitno, I., & Sulton. (2019). A comparison study: Effects of the group investigation model and the direct instruction model toward science concept understanding. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.18135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.18135

Suprihatin. (2015). Upaya Guru Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 3(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.31316/g.couns.v6i1.2198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/ja.v3i1.144

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Tan, I. G. C., Lee, C. K. E., & Sharan, S. (2007). Group investigation affects achievement, motivation, and students' perceptions in Singapore. Journal of Educational Research, 100(3), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.3.142-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.3.142-154

Tuaputty, H. (2021). The Correlation between Critical Thinking Skills and Cognitive Learning Outcomes. 20(1), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.029

Wen, X., & Walters, S. M. (2022). The Impact of Technology on Students’ Writing Performances in Elementary Classrooms: A Meta-Analysis. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100082

Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., Mahanal, S., & Mistianah. (2018). Revealing the relationship between reading interest and critical thinking skills through remap GI and remap jigsaw. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1124a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1124a

Downloads

Published

2023-02-16

How to Cite

Leasa, M., & Marthina Eralisa Wuarlela. (2023). Cooperative Abilities and Cognitive Learning Outcomes: Study Group Investigation on Life Cycle Topic. International Journal of Elementary Education, 7(1), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i1.56162

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): February

Section

Article

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Marleny Leasa

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with the International Journal of Elementary Education agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)