Observed and Perceived Teaching Creativity of English Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v4i1.32137Keywords:
Creativity, Teachers’ Creativity, 21st Century LearningAbstract
Many teachers still use teacher-centered methods in the learning process to make students passive in learning. This study aimed to analyze the creativity of teachers' teaching and how teachers implement creativity in the classroom. This study used the Embedded mix method in which qualitative data will be more dominant while quantitative data will be used as support. The techniques used in collecting data were observation, interviews, and questionnaires. The instrument used in collecting data was a questionnaire. The results of this study indicate that teachers consider themselves creative in teaching in the classroom. Teachers were categorized as slightly creative in teaching creativity in the classroom. The differences that occur between teacher perceptions and implementation were observed in the classroom in one way. Teachers perceive that they were creative. On the other hand, their teaching mostly focuses on conventional media, offline learning, and monotonous media and learning activities.
References
Aditya, A. (2017). Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Audio Visual Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPS Pada Siswa Kelas IV SD. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 4(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23819/mimbar-sd.v4i1.5227.
Ahmad. (2017). Konsep Penilaian Kinerja Guru Dan Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jurnal Mananjemen Pendidikan, 1(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/idaarah.v1i1.4133.
Alfi, C., Sumarmi, S., & Amirudin, A. (2016). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Geografi Berbasis Masalah Dengan Blended Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i4.6203.
Andrian, & Rusman. (2019). Implementasi Pembelajaran Abad 21 Dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 12(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v12i1.20116. 14-23.
Avila, H. A. (2016). Creativity in the English Class : Activities to Promote EFL Learning Creatividad en la clase de inglés : actividades que promueven el. HOW Journal, 22(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.19183/how.22.2.141.
Brown, J. S. (2017). Smart Social Networking : 21 Century Teaching. Research in Pedagogy, 7(1Brown, J. S. (2017). Smart Social Networking : 21 Century Teaching. ResearchinPedagogy, 7(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.45), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.45.
Darmani, J. W., & Renaldi, A. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis : Dampak Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching Dengan Fieldtrip. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 1(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v1i3.3108.
Dharma, G., Wicaksana, A., & Febrianadewi, N. P. (2019). E-Learning Accessibility In State-Owned Schools In North Bali. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 26(1), 8–13.
Fitriyadi, H. (2013). Integrasi Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi Dalam Pendidikan: Potensi Manfaat, Masyarakat Berbasis Pengetahuan, Pendidikan Nilai, Strategi Implementasi Dan Pengembangan Professional. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 21(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v21i3.3255.
Floryantini, K. N., Sudana, D. N., & Sumantri, M. (2019). Pengaruh Model Sfae Berbasis Penilaian Kinerja Terhadap Keterampilan Berbicara Bahasa Indonesia Siswa Kelas V. Mimbar Ilmu, 24(1), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v24i1.17468.
Haviluddin. (2010). Active Learning berbasis Teknologi Informasi (ICT). Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komputer, 5(3). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/jim.v5i3.64.
Izati, S. N., Wahyudi, & Sugiyarti, M. (2018). Project Based Learning Berbasis Literasi untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Tematik. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(9), 1122—1127-1127. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i9.11508.
Kasmaienezhadfard, S. (2015). Students ’ Learning Through Teaching Creativity : Teachers ’ Perception. 4(1), 1–13.
Kembara, Rozak, & Hadian. (2018). Research-based Lectures to Improve Students’ 4C (Communication, Collaboration, Critical Thinking, and Creativity) Skills. Proceedings of the Second Conference on Language, Literature, Education, and Culture (ICOLLITE), 1(1). https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icollite-18.2019.50, . 20019.11.
Kurniaman, & Wuryandani. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah terhadap Motivasi Belajar dan Hasil Belajar PPKn. Jurnal Civics, 14(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/civics.v14i1.14558.
Kuswanto, J., & Walusfa, Y. (2017). Pengembangan Multimedia Pembelajaran pada Mata Pelajaran Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Kelas VIII. Innovative Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology IJCET, 6(2), 58–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcet.v6i2.19335.
Lombardi, M. M., & Oblinger, D. G. (2014). Authentic Learning for the 21st Century : An Overview. (January 2007).
Mawarni, & Muhtadi. (2017). Pengembangan Buku Digital Interaktif Mata kuliah Pengembangan Multimedia Pembelajaran Interaktif Untuk Mahasiswa Teknologi Pendidikan. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 4(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v4i1.10114.
Mediatati, N., & Suryaningsih, I. (2017). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Course Review Horay Dengan Media Flipchart Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar PKn. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 1(2). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v1i2.10146.
Meilani, D., Dantes, N., & Tika, I. N. (2020). Pengaruh Implementasi Pembelajaran Saintifik Berbasis Keterampilan Belajar dan Berinovasi 4C terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA dengan Kovariabel Sikap Ilmiah pada Peserta Didik Kelas V SD Gugus 15 Kecamatan Buleleng. Jurnal Elementary: Kajian Teori Dan Hasil Penelitian Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 3(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31764/elementary.v3i1.1412.
Nakano, T. D. C. (2018). Creativity and innovation : Skills for the 21 st Century Criatividade e inovação : competências para o século XXI. 35(3), 237–246.
Ningrat, S. P., Agung, A. A. G., & Yudana, I. M. (2020). Kontribusi Etos Kerja, Motivasi Kerja, Disiplin Kerja dan Supervisi Akademik Terhadap Kinerja Guru Sd Gugus VII Kecamatan Mengwi. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/japi.v11i1.3169.
Nurkholis. (2013). Pendidikan dalam Upaya Memajukan Teknologi. Jurnal Kependidikan, 1(24). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v1i1.530.
Quint, J., & Condliffe, B. (2018). Project-Based Learning. (January).
Ratnawati, Handayani, & Hadi. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran PBL Berbantu Question Card terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa SMP. Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v10i01.7683.
Road, G. P. (2017). University Of The Cordilleras Changing Roles Of A Teacher 21 St Century Education. 1–7.
Sari, S. (2019). Literasi Media Pada Generasi Milenial Di Era Digital. Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Administrasi Publik, 6(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37676/professional.v6i2.943.
Sholikhah, Z., Kartana, T. J., & Utami, W. B. (2018). Efektifitas Model Pembelajaran Open-Ended Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Kreativitas Siswa. JES-MAT (Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains Matematika), 4(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.25134/jes-mat.v4i1.908.
Sitompul, Setiawan, & Purba. (2017). Pengaruh Media Pembelajaran Dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Desain Sistem Instruksional Pendekatan Tpack. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Dalam Pendidikan, 4(2), 141–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24114/jtikp.v4i2.8761.
Suardana, & Simarmata. (2013). Hubungan Antara Motivasi Belajar dan Kecemasan pada Siswa Kelas Vi Sekolah Dasar di Denpasar Menjelang Ujian Nasional. Jurnal Psikologi Udayana, 1(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/JPU.2013.v01.i01.p20.
Suciu, M., & Lacatus, M. L. (2017). Soft skills and economic education. (January 2014).
Sujana, D. M. A., Dharsana, I. K., & Jayanta, I. N. L. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Two Stay Two Stray melalui Lesson Study terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 6(2). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v6i2.19462.
Suprihatin, S. (2015). Upaya guru dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi UM Metro, 3(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ja.v3i1.144.
Surahman, E., & Mukminan. (2017). Peran guru IPS sebagai pendidik dan pengajar dalam meningkatkan sikap sosial dan tanggung jawab sosial siswa SMP. Harmoni Sosial: Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/hsjpi.v4i1.8660.
Sviangga, Sunardi, & Trapsilasiwi. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan 4C’ Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Jurnal Kadikma, 9(1), 17–23. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/kadikma/article/view/8017/5651.
Todorescu, L., Popescu-mitroi, M., & Greculescu, A. (2015). Students ’ Views on the Teacher as An Information Provider Students ’ Views on the Teacher as An Information Provider. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(November), 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.121.
Utami, I. G. A. L. P., Prestridge, S., Saukah, A., & Hamied, F. A. (2019). Continuing Professional Development and teachers ’ perceptions and practices - A tenable relationship. 9(1), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i1.12463.
Warsihna, J. (2016). Meningkatkan Literasi Membaca Dan Menulis Dengan Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi (TIK). Kwangsan, 4(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31800/jtp.kw.v4n2.p67--80.
Warsita, B. (2017). Peran dan Tantangan Profesi Pengembang Teknologi Pembelajaran Pada Pembelajaran Abad 21. Kwangsan: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 5(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31800/jtp.kw.v5n2.p77--90.
Wulandari, Sudatha, & Simamora. (2020). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Blended Pada Mata Kuliah Ahara Yoga Semester II di IHDN Denpasar. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jeu.v8i1.26459.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review (IJERR) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)