Application of the Rasch Model to the Evaluation of Biological Problems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v8i3.83688Keywords:
Question Analysis, Validity, Reliability, Rasch MeasurementAbstract
Evaluation of student abilities in Biology subjects often faces challenges in ensuring that the instruments used actually measure what they are supposed to measure. The data analysis used is the Rasch model, which is part of item response theory, offering a more accurate approach in analyzing evaluation data. This model allows the identification of items that are inappropriate or too difficult, as well as providing more in-depth information about individual student abilities. Through analysis of instruments and question items from 30 multiple choice questions that emphasize critical thinking skills, the aim of this research is to assess the quality of Biology questions for class X SMA. Testing was carried out using WinStep software and Rasch modeling analysis on 166 students from five high schools/vocational schools. The research method used is quantitative. The results of the instrument investigation show that the issue has very good dependability and the unidimensionality of the instrument is indicated by unexplained changes in the first differentiation. These results show that the Rasch test can help educators in selecting questions that meet the evaluation criteria and contribute to improving the quality of national education. The implications of this research are By applying the Rasch Model, educators can develop more accurate and fair evaluation tools, which are able to identify individual student difficulties and strengths.
References
Afandi, A., Junanto, T., & Afria, R. (2018). Implementasi digital-age literacy dalam pendidikan abad 21 di Indonesia. Prosiding SNPS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains), 8(2), 113–120.
Afriana, N., Halim, A., & Syukri, M. (2018). Analisis Karakteristik Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Ujian Nasional. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i2.627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i2.627
Ali, R. (2021). Differential item functioning pada tes multidimensi. In Buku Pegangan Teori Respon Item (Vol. 3, pp. 67–86). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203115190-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203115190-13
Cecilio-Fernandes, D., Bremers, A., Collares, C. F., Nieuwland, W., Vleuten, C., & Tio, R. A. (2019). Menyelidiki kemungkinan penyebab bias dalam tes kemajuan terjemahan: Pedang bermata satu. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Korea, 31(3), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2019.130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2019.130
Daskalopoulou, A. (2020). Memahami dampak evaluasi siswa yang bias: analisis titik-temu pengalaman akademisi dalam konteks pendidikan tinggi di Inggris. Studi Di Pendidikan Tinggi, 2(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2306364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2306364
Elawed, A. F. E. (2024). Dampak Penerapan Pengukuran Dan Evaluasi Terhadap Peningkatan Mutu Keluaran Pendidikan Universitas. Administrasi Pendidikan: Teori Dan Praktek, 30(4), 6415–6429. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i4.2399.
Farisi, A., Hamid, A., & Melvina. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Konsep Suhu dan Kalor. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa (JIM) Pendidikan Fisika, 2(3), 283–287.
Febriana Sulistya Pratiwi. (2022). Biologi. הארץ, 5(8.5.2017), 2003–2005. https://dataindonesia.id/sektor-riil/detail/angka-konsumsi-ikan-ri-naik-jadi-5648-kgkapita-pada-2022.
Fitriani, A., Zubaidah, S., & Hidayati, N. (2020). Kualitas berpikir kritis siswa: Survei sekolah menengah atas di Bengkulu, Indonesia. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 8(2), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i2.18129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i2.18129
Fitriani, S. S., Yusuf, Y. Q., & Zumara, A. (2019). Penggunaan ranah kognitif dalam pertanyaan: Persepsi mahasiswa dan dosen perguruan tinggi negeri di Aceh. Jurnal Studi Bahasa Dan Linguistik, 17(1), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.903359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.903359
Handayani, Y., & Rahmawati, R. (2020). Penggunaan Model Rasch untuk Menganalisis Reliabilitas dan Validitas Uji Penguasaan Konsep pada Topik Listrik dan Magnet. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu, 8(2), 226–239. https://doi.org/https://journal.stkipsingkawang.ac.id/index.php/JIPF/article/view/3877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v8i2.3877
Hauer, K. E., Park, Y. S., Bullock, J. L., & Tekian, A. (2020). Penilaian Saya Bias!” Pengukuran dan Pendekatan Sosial Budaya untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Penilaian dalam Pendidikan Kedokteran. Kedokteran Akademik, 98(8), 16– 27. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.000000000000005245.
Hizhwati, D., Susilo, S., Amirullah, G., & Supardi, S. (2022). Persepsi Guru Biologi terhadap Mobile Learning dalam Pembelajaran Biologi. EduBiologia: Biological Science and Education Journal, 2(2), 106. https://doi.org/10.30998/edubiologia.v2i2.12973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/edubiologia.v2i2.12973
Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Rodríguez-Gómez, G., & Boud, D. (2021). Kualitas tugas penilaian sebagai penentu pembelajaran. Asesmen Dan Evaluasi Di Perguruan Tinggi, 46(6), 943–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1828268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1828268
Kapas, K. (2021). Komunitas Belajar Kecil Baru: Temuan dari Literatur Terkini. Ed, 459(12), 539.
Karim, S. A., Sudiro, S., & Sakinah, S. (2022). Memanfaatkan analisis soal tes untuk mengetahui tingkat kesukaran dan daya pembeda suatu tes buatan guru. EduLite: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sastra Dan Budaya Inggris, 6(2), 256. https://doi.org/10.30659/e.6.2.256-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30659/e.6.2.256-269
Mokshein, S. E., Ishak, H., & Ahmad, H. (2018). Penggunaan model pengukuran rasch dalam pengujian bahasa Inggris. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i1.22750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i1.22750
Munar, A., Winarti, W., Nai’mah, N., Rezieka, D. G., & Aulia, A. (2020). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Hots) pada Anak Usia Dini dengan Menggunakan Buku Cerita Bergambar. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(3), 4611–4618. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.2224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.2224
Nawawi, S., & Wijayanti, T. F. (2018). Pengembangan asesmen biologi berbasis keterampilan berpikir kritis terintegrasi nilai Islam. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 4(2), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v4i2.21265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v4i2.21265
Nurmatova, S., & Altun, M. (2020). Tinjauan Komprehensif Integrasi Taksonomi Bloom untuk Meningkatkan Dampak Pedagogis Pendidik EFL Pemula. Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Dunia Arab, 14(3), 380–388. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no3.24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no3.24
Rezai, A., Namaziandost, E., Miri, M., & Kumar, T. (2020). Bias demografis dan keadilan penilaian di kelas: wawasan dari para dosen universitas Iran. Pengujian Bahasa Di Asia, 12(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00157-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00157-6
Rukli, R., & Ma’rup, M. (2020). Dampak Siswa Menilai Tingkat Kesukaran Soal Tes Terhadap Minat dan Motivasi Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Sains Pendidikan Dan Linguistik Internasional Randwick, 3(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v3i2.476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v3i2.476
Sadhu, S., Ad’hiya, E., & Laksono, E. W. (2020). Menjelajahi dan membandingkan validitas isi dan asumsi teori modern penilaian terpadu: Studi literasi berpikir kritis-kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(4), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i4.20967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i4.20967
Schellekens, L. H., Kremer, W. D. J., Schaaf, M. F., Vleuten, C. P. M., & Bok, H. G. J. (2023). Antara teori dan praktik: persepsi pendidik terhadap kriteria kualitas penilaian dan dampaknya terhadap pembelajaran siswa. Perbatasan Dalam Pendidikan, 8(Juni), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1147213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1147213
Sekolah, T., Atas, M., & Di, S. M. A. (2021). Siswa Pada Tingkat Sekolah Menengah Atas ( Sma ) Di. 23(23l), 13.
Setiabudi, A., Mulyadi, & Puspita, H. (2019). Analisis Validitas dan Reliabilitas Tes Buatan Guru (Studi Kasus pada Kelas XI SMA N 6 Bengkulu. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran Bahasa Inggris )JEET, 3(4), 522–532.
Steinke, P., & Fitch, P. (2024). Meminimalkan Bias Saat Menilai Hasil Karya Siswa. Penelitian & Praktek Dalam Penilaian, 12(2), 87–95.
Sumartini, A. (2022). Penerapan Taksonomi Digital Bloom Pada Masa Belajar Di Rumah Oleh Guru SMK Di Kalimantan Barat. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(08), 748–760. https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v3i08.998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v3i08.998
Tivani, I., & Paidi, P. (2016). Pengembangan LKS biologi berbasis masalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan karakter peduli lingkungan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i1.8804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i1.8804
Wahidin, D., & Romli, L. A. M. (2019). Perkembangan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Kompetisi Sains dan Matematika Nasional di Indonesia: Kajian Deskriptif. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.22240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.22240
Wahyuni, A. R. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran REACT (Relating, Experiencing, Applying, Cooperating and Transferring) terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Keterampilan Kreativitas Siswa Milenial di SMA. Jurnal Internasional Ilmu Sosial Dan Penelitian Manusia, 04(12), 3954–3958. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i12-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i12-69
Walker, C. M. (2019). Apa DIFnya? mengapa analisis fungsi item diferensial merupakan bagian penting dari pengembangan dan validasi instrumen. Jurnal Penilaian Psikoedukasi, 29(4), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406666
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 ida eElfira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (JERE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
