Addressing the Challenge of Mathematical Misconceptions: Development of Interactive Multimedia Based on Cognitive Conflict Strategy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v7i3.63037Keywords:
Cognitive conflict strategy, Interactive multimedia, Mathematical misconceptionsAbstract
Mathematical misconceptions hinder students' learning and understanding of mathematical concepts. This study aims to analyze the issue of mathematical misconceptions by developing interactive multimedia based on the cognitive conflict strategy. The research design used was research and development with Design-Based Research (DBR), combining qualitative and quantitative data collection techniques. There were fourteen participants in this study including students, teachers, and expert validators, and the research procedure involved the implementation of interactive multimedia interventions. Data collection techniques had pretest and posttest assessments after the intervention, observations, and interviews. The research data were analyzed using the Paired Sample t-Test. The study's findings indicated that the interactive multimedia intervention based on the cognitive conflict strategy effectively reduced students' mathematical misconceptions. The results also demonstrated improved conceptual understanding and increased engagement in the learning process. This research contributes to the field of mathematics education by presenting innovative and practical solutions to address students' misconceptions. The research implications suggest that interactive multimedia based on the cognitive conflict strategy can be used as a pedagogical approach to promote conceptual understanding and reduce mathematical misconceptions.
References
Aberdeen, T. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 14(1), 69–71. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v14i1.73.
Alim, J. A., Fauzan, A., Arwana, I. M., & Musdi, E. (2020). Model of Geometry Realistic Learning Development with Interactive Multimedia Assistance in Elementary School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1471(1), 12053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1471/1/012053.
Amelia, D. P., & Harahap, A. (2021). Application of Interactive Multimedia-Based Mathematics Learning Media to Increase Students’ Interest in Learning. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 3153–3161. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i2.2040.
Angouri, J. (2018). Research Methods in Linguistics. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350043466.
Anwar, M. S., Choirudin, C., Ningsih, E. F., Dewi, T., & Maseleno, A. (2019). Developing an interactive mathematics multimedia learning based on ispring presenter in increasing students’ interest in learning mathematics. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 135–150. https://103.88.229.8/index.php/al-jabar/article/view/4445.
Arifin, M. B. U. B., Sholeh, M., Hafiz, A., Agustin, R. D., & Wardana, M. D. K. (2021). Developing Interactive Mobile Mathematics Inquiry to Enhance Students’ Problem-solving Skill. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM, 15(01), 24. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i01.20067.
Aristika, A., & Juandi, D. (2021). The Effectiveness of Hybrid Learning in Improving of Teacher-Student Relationship in Terms of Learning Motivation. Emerging Science Journal, 5(4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2021-01288.
Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2022). An exploration of teacher and student perceptions of blended learning in four secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(4), 719–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00359-2.
Bicen, H., Ozdamli, F., & Uzunboylu, H. (2014). Online and blended learning approach on instructional multimedia development courses in teacher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(4), 529–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.682586.
Black, W., & Babin, B. J. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis: Its Approach, Evolution, and Impact. In B. J. Babin & M. Sarstedt (Eds.), The Great Facilitator incollection (pp. 121–130). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06031-2_16.
Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM, 48(5), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4.
Chiu, T. K. F., & Churchill, D. (2016). Design of learning objects for concept learning: Effects of multimedia learning principles and an instructional approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1355–1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1006237.
Deb, D., Fuad, M. M., & Farag, W. (2014). Developing interactive classroom exercises for use with mobile devices to enhance class engagement and problem-solving skills. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044043.
Fitriani, A. D. (2014). Pengembangan Multimedia Interaktif Dalam Pembelajaran Geometri Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar. Edutech, 13(2), 236. https://doi.org/10.17509/edutech.v13i2.3105.
Fröhlich, V. (2009). Erik Homburger Erikson: Childhood and Society. In S. Seichter, B. Fuchs, & W. Böhm (Eds.), Hauptwerke der Pädagogik (pp. 116–118). Brill | Schöningh. https://doi.org/10.30965/9783657768387_048.
GebreYohannes, H. M., Hadi Bhatti, A., & Hasan, R. (2016). Impact of multimedia in Teaching Mathematics. International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology, 39(1), 80–83. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315373/IJMTT-V39P510.
Keeley, P., & Tobey, C. R. (2017). Mathematics Formative Assessment. Corwin, 2. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071872444.
Kellett, K. (2008). Adult Development and Aging. Educational Gerontology, 34(10), 940–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270802346839.
Lester, F. K., Garofalo, J., & Kroll, D. L. (1989). Self-Confidence, Interest, Beliefs, and Metacognition: Key Influences on Problem-Solving Behavior. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving (pp. 75–88). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3614-6_6.
Maag, M. (2004). The Effectiveness of an Interactive Multimedia Learning Tool on Nursing Studentsʼ Math Knowledge and Self-efficacy: CIN: Computers. Informatics, Nursing, 22(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024665-200401000-00007.
Malambo, P. (2021). Implicit Misconceptions in Prospective Mathematics Teachers’ Reasoning About Trigonometric Concepts. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 2(2), 21011. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/11054.
Matthews, P. H. (1967). N. Chomsky Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 119–152. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012998.
Minarni, A., Napitupulu, E., & Husein, R. (2016). Mathematical understanding and representation ability of public junior high school in North Sumatra. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.1.2816.43-56.
Molina, A. I., Navarro, Ó., Ortega, M., & Lacruz, M. (2018). Evaluating multimedia learning materials in primary education using eye tracking. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 59, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.02.004.
Nasir, A. M., & Nirfayanti, N. (2020). Effectiveness Of Mathematic Learning Media Based On Mobile Learning In Improving Student Learning Motivation. Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 228. https://doi.org/10.26858/jds.v7i3.11867.
Nicholls, L. (2007). How to do a Research Project. A Guide for Undergraduate Students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(1), 110–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04394.x.
Nugroho, S. A., Trisniawati, T., & Rhosyida, N. (2022). Developing powerpoint-based interactive multimedia of mathematics learning multiples and factors materials for elementary school. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(2), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2022.02.009.
Núñez-Peña, M. I., Bono, R., & Suárez-Pellicioni, M. (2015). Feedback on students’ performance: A possible way of reducing the negative effect of math anxiety in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 70, 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.005.
Parwati, N. N., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2020). Effectiveness of the implementation of cognitive conflict strategy assisted by e-service learning to reduce students’ mathematical misconceptions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(11), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V15I11.11802.
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667.
Roselizawati Hj Sarwadi, H., & Shahrill, M. (2014). Understanding Students’ Mathematical Errors and Misconceptions: The Case of Year 11 Repeating Students. Mathematics Education Trends and Research, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5899/2014/metr-00051.
Santagata, R. (2009). Designing Video-Based Professional Development for Mathematics Teachers in Low-Performing Schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328485.
Santagata, R., & Bray, W. (2016). Professional development processes that promote teacher change: The case of a video-based program focused on leveraging students’ mathematical errors. Professional Development in Education, 42(4), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1082076.
Schnepper, L. C., & McCoy, L. P. (2013). Analysis of Misconceptions in High School Mathematics. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 15(1), 625–625. https://doi.org/10.4148/2470-6353.1066.
Steuer, G., Rosentritt-Brunn, G., & Dresel, M. (2013). Dealing with errors in mathematics classrooms: Structure and relevance of perceived error climate. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.03.002.
Trenholm, S. (2023). Challenges and suggestions regarding the aesthetic experience of mathematics when teaching and learning fully online. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 2(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263231166415.
Trenholm, S., & Peschke, J. (2020). Teaching undergraduate mathematics fully online: A review from the perspective of communities of practice. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00215-0.
Uhl, J. D., Sripathi, K. N., Meir, E., Merrill, J., Urban-Lurain, M., & Haudek, K. C. (2021). Automated writing assessments measure undergraduate learning after completion of a computer-based cellular respiration tutorial. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-06-0122.
Widianti, W., & Hidayati, N. (2021). Analysis of the mathematical literacy ability of junior high school students on triangle and quadrilateral material. Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 4(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i1.27-38.
Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: An analysis of students’ errors. Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555–584. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/306080.
Yook, J., Kim, K., Son, B. C., & Park, S. (2021). A translating program usability analysis of alternative multimedia mathematics materials for the blind. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(26–27), 34643–34659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09153-5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Widodo Winarso, Toheri , Tamsik Udin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Education Technology agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
