Quining Ecofeminism: Saintifikasi Keadilan Iklim dan Gender
Quining Ecofeminism: The Saintification of Climate Justice and Gender
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v7i1.64402Keywords:
ecofeminism, philosophy of science, naturalized epistemologyAbstract
Ecofeminism as a theory is far from complete to solve the problems of climate injustice, gender and even other problems that may be under the umbrella of ecofeminism. This article finds that ecofeminism is sufficient as a scientific stance (axiology), but not enough at the epistemic level. The tendency of ecofeminism theorists to characterize the ontology of nature and women: with specific gender or other analogies, instead of focusing on the scope of "explanation and methodology" makes it not holistic and stuck as an academic study. The rest of this article constructs an adequate epistemology for academics to use ecofeminism, namely with W. V. O. Quine's naturalized epistemology as an offer to lubricate the ontological burden of ecofeminist theory which actually makes the ecofeminist journey towards climate and gender justice stuck.
References
Adams, C. J. (Ed.). (1995). Ecofeminism and the sacred. Continuum.
Asmarani, N. N. O. (2018). Ekofeminisme dalam Antroposen: Relevankah? Kritik terhadap Gagasan Ekofeminisme. Jurnal Multidisipliner Mahasiswa Indonesia, 1(1).
Brown, C., & Luper, S. (2016). Naturalized epistemology. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-P033-2
Claveau, F. (2016). Don Ross, Philosophy of Economics. OEconomia, 6–1, 161–166. https://doi.org/10.4000/oeconomia.2287
Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. Viking.
Fahimah, S. (2017). Ekofeminisme: Teori dan Gerakan. Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam, 1(1), 6–19.
Haack, S. (1978). Philosophy of logics. Cambridge University Press.
Astuti, T. M. (2012). Ekofeminisme dan Peran Perempuan dalam Lingkungan. Indonesian Journal of Conservation, 1(1), 49–60.
Purbandani, A. M., & Mahaswa, R. K. (2022). Ekofeminisme Kritis: Menelaah Ulang Gender, Keadilan Ekologi, dan Krisis Iklim. Jurnal Perempuan, 27(3), 227–239.
Quine, W. V. O. (1951). Two Dogma of Empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43.
Ross, D. (2014). Philosophy of Economics. Palgrave macmillan.
Wulan, T. R. (2007). Ekofeminisme Transformatif: Alternatif Kritis Mendekonstruksi Relasi Perempuan dan Lingkungan. Jurnal Transdisiplin Sosiologi, Komunikasi, Dan Ekologi Manusia, 1(1), 105–130.
Furner, J. (2004). Conceptual Analysis: A Method for Understanding Information as Evidence, and Evidence as Information. Archival Science, 4(3-4), 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-2594-8.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia Undiksha is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
