Paradigma Filosofis Integrasi Keilmuan Berdasarkan Refleksi Historis Perguruan Tinggi Keislaman

Philosophical Paradigm of Scientific Integration Based on Historical Reflections on Islamic Higher Education

Authors

  • Maya Sari Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v7i2.75649

Keywords:

paradigm, philosophy, ; scientific integration

Abstract

The scientific integration paradigm is not immediately accepted and has good implications at the UIN level in PTKI. So many problems that arise in its application so this study aims to; analyze the history of PTKI in Indonesia as an effort to discover a developing scientific paradigm; analyze how the anomaly of thought began to occur; describe how the new paradigm developed and; know the implications of that paradigm. This study uses literature studies to construct analytical narratives. Thomas Khun taught about the meaning of paradigm, even though his big idea was to criticize the doctrinal truth of science. In this case the view of religious knowledge cannot be forced at all in reflecting the paradigm of scientific integration. However, Lakatos was able to offer the concept of a "Research Program" to review that religious scholarship is absolute hardcore and must be protected by falsification. Wrapped in the Protective Belt as another scientific analogy, it can be seen how the implementation of religious-based scientific integration is simply illustrated in Lakatos's philosophy.

References

Arifudin, I. (2016). Integrasi Sains dan Agama serta Implikasinya terhadap Pendidikan Islam. Edukasia Islamika, 1.

Darda, A. (2015). Integrasi Ilmu dan Agama: Perkembangan Konseptual di Indonesia. 1, 40.

Daulay, H. P. (2018). Sejarah Pertumbuhan dan Perkembangan Pendidikan Islam. Kencana. Implementasi Integrasi Keilmuan di PTKI, (2019).

Fadriati. (2018). Proses transformasi IAIN-UIN (Analisis Historis Serta Kompleksitas Kebutuhan Kini dan Mendatang. Batusangkar, 1(2),165–174. Https://Ojs.Iainbatusangkar.Ac.Id/Ojs/Inde x.Php/Proceedings/Article/View/865.

Ghins, M. (1998). Kuhn: Realist or Antirealist? Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology, 2(1), 37–60.

Godfrey, P. (2003). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science Theory and Reality. The University of Chicago Press.

Hanun, F. (2023). Implementasi Integrasi Keilmuan di UIN Salatiga. EDUKASI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama dan Keagamaan, 21(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v21i1.1482.

Hasanah, U. (2018). Pembelajaran Tematik Integratif (Studi Relevansi Terhadap Integrasi Keilmuan dalam Pendidikan Islam). Prosiding Konferensi Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam dan Sains, 1(September), 63–68. http://sunankalijaga.org/prosiding/index.php/kiiis/article/view/12.

Ikhwan, A. (2016). Perguruan Tinggi Islam dan Integrasi Keilmuan Islam : Sebuah Realitas Menghadapi Tantangan Masa Depan. Jurnal At-Tajdid, Vol 9 No 2.

Iskandar, S. (2016). Studi Kasus UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. Jurnal Ilmu Agama dan Sosial Budaya, 1(1), 86–93.

Jamal, N. (2017). Model-Model Integrasi Keilmuan Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam. KABILAH : Journal of Social Community, 2(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.35127/kbl.v2i1.3088

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: With an Introductory Essay by Ian Hacking. In The University of Chicago Press. The University of Chicago Press.

Lakatos, I. (1968). Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. The Aristotelian Society and Blackwell Publishing.

Lubis, R. R. (2021). Universitas Islam Negeri (Studi Historisitas, Perkembangan dan Model Integrasi Keilmuan). Hikmah, 18(2), 150–167. https://doi.org/10.53802/hikmah.v18i2.128.

Mamnunah, M., & Sauri, S. (2020). Relevansi Pemikiran Thomas Khun Terhadap Penerapan Ijma’. Aqlania, 11(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.32678/aqlania.v11i1.2642.

Mas’ud, A. (2002). Sejarah dan Pertumbuhan Pesantren di Indonesia. Pustaka Pelajar, 53(9), 50.

Muslih, M. (2016). Integrasi Keilmuan: Isu Mutakhir Filsafat Ilmu. Kalimah, 14(2), 245. https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v14i2.615.

Pekalongan, T. S. (2022). Lima IAIN Resmi Berubah Menjadi Universitas Islam Negeri. Suara Merdeka.

Rapono, M. (2019). UIN-IAIN-STAIN: Perkembangan Epistemologi dan Institusi Perguruan Tinggi Islam Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, VIII(2), 67–82.

Rifai, N., Fauzan, F., & Bahrissalim, B. (2014). Integrasi Keilmuan dalam Pengembangan Kurikulum UIN Se-Indonesia: Evaluasi Penerapan Integrasi Keilmuan UIN dalam Kurikulum dan Proses Pembelajaran. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 2(1), 13–34. https://doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v1i1.1108.

Rifai, N., Sayuti, W., & Bahrissalim. (2014). Integrasi Keilmuan dalam Pengembangan Kurikulum di UIN Se-Indonesia: Tarbiya, 1(1), 14–34.

Romanycia, M. H. J., & Pelletier, F. J. (1985). What is a Heuristic? Computational Intelligence, 1(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1985.tb00058.x.

Sufratman. (2022). Integrasi Agama dan Sains Modern di Universitas Islam Negeri. Al-Afkar: Journal for Islamic Studies, 5(1), 209–228. http://www.al-afkar.com/index.php/Afkar_Journal/article/view/211.

Tharaba, F. (2019). Kajian Pemikiran Integrasi Keilmuan Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang melalui Ulul Albab. Proceeding of International Conference on Islamic Education: Challenges in Technology and Literacy Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Universitas Islam NegeriMaulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, 4, 126–142. http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/7973/.

Ulya, I., & Abid, N. (2015). Pemikiran Thomas Kuhn dan Relevansinya Terhadap Keilmuan Islam. Fikrah: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan, 3(2), 249–276.

Wahjoetomo. (2022). Perguruan Tinggi Pesantren. AL Fikrah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Islam, 2(1), 1–13. https://stai-binamadani.e-journal.id/Alfikrah.

Zainal Abidin Bagir, Jarot Wahyudi, A. A. (2005). Integrasi Ilmu Agama, Interpretasi, dan Aksi. Suka Press.

Published

2024-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles