The Development of Scaffolding Aided Learning Tools Using 5E Learning Cycle Model

Authors

  • Rody Putra Sartika UNIVERSITAS TANJUNGPURA
  • E. Enawaty UNIVERSITAS TANJUNGPURA
  • I. Lestari UNIVERSITAS TANJUNGPURA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i3.15712

Keywords:

Learning tools development, 5E learning cycle

Abstract

Learning tools have important role to promote effective learning process. Available learning tools was still unable to construct good understanding for students especially in acid base topic. The aims of this study were to examine validity and application of tools and to describe improvement of students conceptual understanding before and after tools applied during learning process. Dick and Carey model was applied as research method. Data were collected by means of interview, observation, and test. Data were analyzed through descriptive qualitative analysis. According to data analysis, validity of lesson plan, worksheet, hand book and evaluation tools were 90,95%, 90,59%, 92,16%, and 97,14% respectively which categorized as very valid. The application of learning tools was 92,16% which categorized as very good. The improvement of students conceptual understanding was 0,57 which categorized as average. This research provides learning tools that enhance students conceptual understanding of the concept of acid-base topic.

References

Alice, K., & David, K. (2018). Eight Important Things to Know About The Experiential Learning Cycle. Australian Educational Leader, 40(3), 8–14.

Aprian, R. D., Sunyono, & Efkar, T. (2017). Pengaruh Strategi Scaffolding pada Pembelajaran SiMaYang dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/JPK/article/view/12799

Armansyah, A., Ibrahim, M., & Wasis, W. (2018). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Menggunakan Model Siklus Belajar 5E untuk Melatihkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 6(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v6i2.967

Astriani, D., & Istiqomah, N. N. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E: Mengaktifkan Siswa Pada Materi Suhu dan Perubahannya. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 1(2), 71–75. https://doi.org/https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jppipa/article/view/1746

Budiman, R., Muchlis, & Rusdi Efrida, E. (2019). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII SMPN 15 Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS), 3(2), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.33369/jp2ms.3.2.218-227

Erlin Eveline, Suparno, S., Ardiyati, T. K., & Dasilva, B. E. (2019). Development of Interactive Physics Mobile Learning Media for Enhancing Students’ HOTS in Impulse and Momentum with Scaffolding Learning Approach. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.05207

Hartawati, Y., Harjono, A., & Verawati, N. N. S. P. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Momentum Dan Impuls Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Peserta Didik Dengan Model Learning Cycle 5E. ORBITA: Jurnal Kajian, Inovasi Dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 181. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v6i1.1515

Ilmi, N., Salempa, P., & Side, S. (2019). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5 E y ang Terintegrasi dengan Metode Problem Solving The Application of Learning Cycle 5E Model which was Integrated with Problem Solving Method. Jurnal Sainsmat, 8(2), 36–46. https://doi.org/https://ojs.unm.ac.id/sainsmat/article/view/10718/0

Imran, A., Amini, R., & Aliasar. (2019). The development of Science learning module use the Learning Cycle 5E for Elementary School student. 3(Global Conferences Series: Social Sciences, Education and Humanities (GCSSSEH), 3, 175–180. https://doi.org/https://series.gci.or.id/article/206/13/icesshum-2019

Iswara, G. P., Kuswandi, D., & Husna, A. (2020). Pengembangan Multimedia Interaktif Dilengkapi Dengan Simulasi Untuk Memvisualisasikan Reaksi Kimia Pada Materi Larutan Penyangga SMA Kelas XI. JINOTEP (Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pembelajaran), 58–68.

Juniarsih, Q. A. (2015). Peningkatan Retensi Belajar Materi Klasifikasi Makhluk Hidup Melalui Penerapan Discovery Leraning dan Team Games Tournament pada Siswa Kelas VII-G SMP NEGERI 18 Malang. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi, 157–167.

Kazempour, M., Amirshokoohi, A., & Blamey, K. (2020). Putting theory to practice: Teaching the 5E learning cycle through immersive experiences for pre-service teachers. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1242141

Kim, S., Choi, H., & Paik, S. H. (2019). Using a Systems Thinking Approach and a Scratch Computer Program to Improve Students’ Understanding of the Brønsted-Lowry Acid-Base Model. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12), 2926–2936. https://doi.org/https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00210

Latifa, B. R. A., Verawati, N. N. S. P., & Harjono, A. (2017). Pengaruh Model Learning Cycle 5E (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaboration, & Evaluate) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Kelas X Man 1 Mataram. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 3(1), 61. https://doi.org/http://jurnalfkip.unram.ac.id/index.php/JPFT/article/view/325

Masnia, F., & Zubaidah Amir, M. (2019). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Scaffolding terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Berdasarkan SElf Efficacy Siswa SMP. Juring(Journal for Research in Mathematics Learning), 2(3), 249– 256. https://doi.org/10.24014/juring.v2i3.7675

Muflihah, Supardi, K. I., & Sumarni, W. (2020). Concept Understanding Analysis of Coloid Materials After Application of Joyful Learning Problem Based Learning. JISE, 9(3), 306 – 313. https://doi.org/10.15294/JISE.V9I1.36713

Murnaka, N. P., & Yuniarti, N. (2018). Efektifitas Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5e Terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Kelas VII. Kreano Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 9(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v9i1.10957

Nissen, J. M., Talbot, R. M., Thompson, A. N., & Van Dusen, B. (2018). A comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for analyzing gains on concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010115

Pratama, R. A., & Saregar, A. (2019). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berbasis Scaffolding Untuk Melatih Pemahaman Konsep. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v2i1.3975

Pratiwi, D. D. (2016). Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5e berbantuan GeoGebra terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(9), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v7i2.34

Putra, F., Nur Kholifah, I. Y., Subali, B., & Rusilowati, A. (2018). 5E-Learning Cycle Strategy: Increasing Conceptual Understanding and Learning Motivation. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 7(2), 171. https://doi.org/https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1f6d/b0ec17573220b4de7b10c70c145602d2e3e3.pdf

Rahmawati, A. P., Aisyah, R. S., & Afiffah, I. (2019). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran POGIL Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Larutan Penyangga. EduChemia, 4(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v4i1.4846

Rapitasari, D., Herawaty, D., & Yensy, N. A. (2017). Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas Viii Melalui Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS, 1(1), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.33369/jp2ms.1.1.87-93

Rejeki, D. P., Hasan, M., & Haji, A. G. (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E pada Materi Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Sikap Peserta Didik SMAN 1 Krueng Barona Jaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 3(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JPSI/article/view/7646

Sari, I. N., Saputri, D. F., & Beno, Y. (2016). Penerapan Model Learning Cycle 5E dalam Materi Besaran Pokok dan Turunan di Kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Sengah Temila. Urnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-BiRuNi, 5(2), 277–282. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v5i2.127

Sartika, R. P. (2018). Peranan Model Siklus Belajar 5E dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Sifat Koligatif Larutan. EduChemia, 3(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v3i2.3052

Sartika, R. P., & Ariansyah, D. (2019). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Menggunakan Model Siklus Belajar 5E Berbantuan Strategi PQ4R Pada Materi Hidrolisis Garam. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Tanjungpura Tahun 2019, 413–423.

Sartika, R. P., & Lestari, I. (2016). Peningkatan Pemahaman Siswa pada Materi Koloid menggunakan Pembelajaran Model Siklus Belajar 5E Kelas XI SMAN 2 Pontianak. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 7(2), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v3i2.3052

Shofiah, S., Lukito, A., & Siswono, T. Y. (2018). Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E Berbasis Pengajuan Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X pada Topik Trigonometri. Kreano, 9(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v9i1.9856

Sobirin, M., H, S. K., & Kusairi, S. (2018). Distributed Scaffolding on Inquiry Learning towards Hig. 6(4), 128–134.

Suardana, I. N., Redhana, I. W., Sudiatmika, A. A. I. A. R., & Selamat, I. N. (2018). Students’ critical thinking skills in chemistry learning using local culture-based 7E learning cycle model. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 399–412. https://doi.org/https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1174908

Sudarman, S. W., & Linuhung, N. (2017). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Scafolding Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Integral Mahasiswa. Aksioma Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v6i1.866

Sudarman, Satrio Wicaksono, & Linuhung, N. (2017). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Scafolding Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Integral Mahasiswa. Aksioma Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v6i1.866

Sun, J. C. Y., & Hsu, K. Y. C. (2019). A smart eye-tracking feedback scaffolding approach to improving students’ learning self-efficacy and performance in a C programming course. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.036

Sun, Jerry Chih Yuan, & Hsu, K. Y. C. (2019). A smart eye-tracking feedback scaffolding approach to improving students’ learning self-efficacy and performance in a C programming course. Computers in Human Behavior, 95(April 2018), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.036

Sunyono, & Meristin, A. (2019). The Effect of Multiple Representation-Based Scaffolding Strategy in Improving Chemical Literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 9(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/jpp/

Tri Astuti, R., & Marzuki, H. (2018). Analisis Kesulitan Pemahaman Konsep Pada Materi Titrasi Asam Basa Siswa Sma. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 1(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v1i1.1862

Yohana, I., Sudarmin, S., Wardani, S., & Norashikin, S. (2018). The generic science skill profile of fourth grade students on acid and base topic in guided inquiry learning model. International Journal of Active Learning, 3(2), 110–116. https://doi.org/https://www.learntechlib.org/p/208673/

Yuliana, I., Kusairi, S., Taufiq, A., Priyadi, R., & Rosyidah, N. D. (2020). The Analysis of Students’ Problem-Solving Ability in the 5E Learning Cycle with Formative E-Assessment. The 3rd International Conference on Mathematics and Sciences Education (ICoMSE.

Zainuddin, N., Sahrir, M. S., Idrus, R. M., & Jaafar, M. N. (2016). Scaffolding a conceptual support for personalized arabic vocabulary learning using augmented reality (ar) enhanced flashcards. Journal of Personalized Learning, 2(1), 102–110.

Zamahsari, G. K., Roffi’uddin, A. H., & HS, W. (2019). Implementasi Scaffolding dalam Pembelajaran BIPA di Kelas Pemula. Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i1.11860

Downloads

Published

2020-09-04

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 3 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)