The Influence of Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Review Method Toward Reading Comprehension Ability Mediated by Working Memory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i1.23101Keywords:
Metacognition, Reading Comprehension, Working Memory, SQ3RAbstract
Reading comprehension plays a vital role in students' academic achievement. This empirical study aims to determine the influence of survey, question, read, recite, and review (SQ3R) method on reading comprehension ability. The impact of mediation on semantic and phonological working memory toward reading comprehension ability after being given the SQ3R method. The empirical study was Quasi-experimental with untreated control group design with dependent pretest and posttest samples. The total participants are 57 students in elementary school. Thirty of the subjects were selected based on colored progressive matrices and reading comprehension measurement in equal. In this case, 15 students as treatment groups and 15 students as a control group. Backward digit span task was used to measure phonological working memory, sentence completion, responsibility for semantic working memory, and reading comprehension test for reading comprehension ability. Causal analysis technique by SPSS MACRO PROCESS was used to examine the hypothesis of the research. The results revealed that there was an influence SQ3R method toward reading comprehension ability. Semantic working memory and phonological working memory are mediate between SQ3R and reading comprehension, but the mediating effect of semantic working memory is more reliable than phonological working memory. This research indicated that the effectivity of the SQ3R method to improve reading comprehension was mediated by working memory capacity in Bajo’s children.
References
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies. Annu. Rev. Psychol, 63:1–29, doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422.
Banerjee, P. A., & Lamb, S. (2016). A systematic review of factors linked to poor academic performance of disadvantaged students in science and maths in school. Congent Education, 3(1). doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2016.1178441.
Botsas, G. (2017). Differences in strategy use in the reading comprehension of narrative and science text among students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities : A contemporary Journal, 15(1), 139-162.
Chevaller, T. M., Parrila, R., Ritchie, K., & Deacon, H. (2015). The Role of Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Metacognitive Study and Learning Strategies, and Behavioral Study and Learning Strategies in Predicting Academic Success in Students with and Without a History of Reading Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(1): 34-48.
Concannon-Gibney, T., & McCarthy, M. J. (2012). The explicit teaching of reading comprehension in science class: A pilot professional development program. Improving Schools, 15(1) 73–88. DOI: 10.1177/1365480211433726
de Carvalho, C. A. F., de Kida, A. S. B., Capellini, S. A., & de Avila, C. R. B. (2014). Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia. Frontiers in Psychology, 5: 746. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00746
Derakhshanrad, S. A., & Piven, E. A. (2018). Cognitive neurodynamic approach to prediction of students’ adaptation to college: An ex-post facto study. BCN, 9(3): 217-226, doi: 10.29252/nirp.bcn-9.3.217
Fellman, D., Jykka, J., Waris, O., Soveri, A., Ritakallo, L., Haga, S. & Laine, M. (2020). The role of strategy uses in working memory training outcomes. Journal of Working Memory and Language, 110, 104064.
Ferrara, A., & Panlililo, C.C. (2020). The role of metacognition in explaining the relationship between early adversity and reading comprehension. Children and Youth Service Review, 112: 104884.
Follmer, J., & Sperling, R. A. (2018). Interaction between reader and text: Contributions on cognitive processes, strategy use, and text cohesion to comprehension expository science text. Learning and Individual Differences, 67: 177-187.
Fuchs, L.S., Gilbert, J. K., Fuchs, D., Seethaler, P. M., & Martin, B. L. N. (2018). Text Comprehension and Oral Language as Predictors of Word- Problem Solving: Insights into Word-Problem Solving as a Form of Text Comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(2): 152-166
Furnes, B., & Norman, E. (2015). Metacognition and Reading: Comparing Three Forms of Metacognition in Normally Developing Readers and Readers with Dyslexia. Dyslexia (Chichester, England), 21(3), 273–284. doi:10.1002/dys.1501
Gajria, M., & Jitendra, K. (2016). Effective strategies for developing reading comprehension. Dalam R. Schiff dan R. M. Doshi. Intervention in Learning Disabilities. A Handbook on Systematic Training Programs for Individual with Learning Disabilities. Hal. 119-138. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-3123-4
Gallego, C., Martin –Aragoneses, M. T., López-Higes, R., & PisÖn, G. (2016). Semantic and syntactic reading comprehension strategies used by deaf children with early and late cochlear implantation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 49–50:153-170.
Grainger, C., Williams, D. M., & Lind, S. E. (2016). Metacognitive monitoring and control processes in children with autism spectrum disorder: Diminished judgement of confidence accuracy. Consciousness and Cognition, 42: 65-74.
Gropper, R. J., & Tannock, R. (2009). A Pilot Study of Working Memory and Academic Achievement in College Students With ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 12(6): 574-581
Ilter, I. (2017). Improving the reading comprehension of primary-school students at frustration- level reading through the paraphrasing strategy training: A multiple-probe design study. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10 (1): 147-161.
Jian, Y. C. (2018). Reading instruction influence cognitive processes of illustrated text reading not subjected perception: An eye-tracking study. Frontiers Psychology, 9, 2263. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02263
Jung, J. (2018). Effect of task complexity and working memory capacity on L2 reading comprehension. System, 74: 21-37.
Jones, J. S., Milton, F., Mostazir, M., & Adlam, A. R. (2019). The academic outcomes of working memory and metacognitive strategy training in children: A double blind randomized controlled trial. Developmental Science, 00: e12870, doi:10.1111/desc.12870.
Katz, B., & Shah, P. (2017). The role of child socioeconomic status in cognitive training outcomes. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 53: 139-150.
Kim, G. Y. S., & Phillips, B. (2016). Five minutes a day to improve comprehension monitoring in oral language context. An exploratory intervention study with prekindergartners from low-income families. Top Lang Disorder, 36(4), 356-367. doi: 10.1097/TLD.0000000000000103.
Kush, D., Johnson, C. L., & Dyke, J. A. V. (2015). Identifying the role of phonology in sentence- level reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 79-80: 18-29.
Lonigan, C. J. & Burgess, S. R. (2017) Dimensionality of Reading Skills with Elementary-School-Age Children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21:3, 239-253, DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2017.1285918
MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). Integrating mediators and moderators in research design. Res. Soc. Work. Pract, 21(6):675-681, doi:10.1177/1049731511414148.
McArthur, G., Castles, A., Kohnen, S., & Banales, E. (2016). Low self-concept in poor readers: prevalence, heterogeneity, and risk. PeerJ, 4, e2669. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2669
McElvany, M., & Artlet, C. (2009). Systematic reading training in the family: Development, implementation, and initial evaluation of the Berlin Parent–Child Reading Program. Learning and Instruction, 19(1): 79-95.
Mehrdat, A. G., & Ahghar, M. R., & Ahghar, M. (2012). The effect of teaching cognitive and metacognitive strategies on EFL students’ reading comprehension across proficiency levels. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46: 3757-3763
Meyer, M. L., Salimpoor, V. N., Wu, S. S., Geary, D. C., & Menon, V. (2010). Differential contribution of specific working memory components to mathematics achievement in 2nd and 3rd graders. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2): 101–109. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.08.004.
Mirandola, C., Ciriello, A., Gigli, M., & Cornoldi, C. (2018). Metacognitive Monitoring of Text Comprehension: An Investigation on Postdictive Judgments in Typically Developing Children and Children with Reading Comprehension Difficulties. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2253. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02253
Muijselaar, M., Swart, N., Steenbeek-Planting, E., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & de Jong, P. (2018). The effect of a strategy training on reading comprehension in fourth-grade students, The Journal of Educational Research, 111:6, 690-703, DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2017.1396439
Nicolileo-Carriho, A. P., Crenitte, P. A. P., Lopes-Herrera, S. A., & Hage, S. R., de V. (2018). Relationship between phonological working memory, metacognitive skills and reading comprehension in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Oral Science: revista FOB, 26, e20170414. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0414
Nishiyama R (2018) Separability of active semantic and phonological maintenance in verbal working memory. PLoS ONE 13(3), e0193808.
Nouwens, S., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). How working memory relates to children’s reading comprehension: the importance of domain-specificity in storage and processing. Reading and Writting, 30: 105-120. DOI 10.1007/s11145-016-9665-5
Nutley, S. B., & Söderqvist, S. (2017). How Is Working Memory Training Likely to Influence Academic Performance? Current Evidence and Methodological Considerations. Frontiers in Psychology, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00069
Nyarko, K., Kugbey, N., Kofi, C. C., Cole, Y. A., & Adentwi, K. I. (2018). English Reading Proficiency and Academic Performance Among Lower Primary School Children in Ghana. SAGE, 1-10. doi: 10.1177/2158244018797019.
Rode, C., Robson, R., Purviance, A., Geary, D. C., & Mayr, U. (2014). Is Working Memory Training Effective? A Study in a School Setting. PLoS ONE 9(8): e104796.
Sidak, H. M., & Rahim, H. Ab. (2015). The role of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension: A cross-linguistic study. Proceedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197: 50-56, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.046.
Siregar, N. R. (2019). Cool dan hot brain executive functioning dan performansi akademik siswa. Buletin Psikologi, 26(2): 97-110, doi:10.22146/buletinpsikologi.38817
Shivde, G., & Anderson, M. C. (2011). On the existence of semantic working memory: Evidence for direct semantic maintenance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1342-1370.
Soto, C., de Blume, P. G. A., Jacovina, M., McNamara, D., Benson, N., Riffo, B., &... (2019) Reading comprehension and metacognition: The importance of inferential skills. Cogent Education, 6:1, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2019.1565067
Sparapani, N., Connor, C. M., McLean, L., Wood, T., Toste, J., & Day, S. (2018). Direct and Reciprocal Effects among Social Skills, Vocabulary, and Reading Comprehension in First Grade. Contemporary educational psychology, 53, 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.03.003
Swanson, H. L., & Kong, J. E. (2018). Working memory and reading: Is there evidence for an executive processing deficit? In L. Meltzer (Ed.), Executive function in education: From theory to practice (p. 218–239). Guilford Press.
Swanson, H. L., & O’Connor, R. (2009). The Role of Working Memory and Fluency Practice on the Reading Comprehension of Students Who Are Dysfluent Readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(6): 548-575.
Tajalli, P., & Satari, S. (2013). Effectiveness of metacognitive strategies on reading skills of students with hearing disorders. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84:139-143, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.524
Tan, Y., Martin, R. C., & Dyke, J. A. V. (2017). Semantic and syntactic interference in sentence comprehension: A comparison of working memory models. Front. Psychol. 8:198. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00198
van den Bosch, L. J., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2019) The Role of Linguistic Diversity in the Prediction of Early Reading Comprehension: A Quantile Regression Approach. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23:3, 203-219, doi: 10.1080/10888438.2018.1509864.
van Wingerden, E, Segers, E., van Balkom, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Foundations of reading comprehension in children with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 60: 211-222.
Wassenburg S.I., de Koning B.B, de Vries MH & van der Schoot M (2016) Does the Component Processes Task Assess Text-Based Inferences Important for Reading Comprehension? A Path Analysis in Primary School Children. Front. Psychol. 7:895. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00895
Wigfield, A., Gladstone, J., & Turci, L. (2016). Beyond cognition: Reading motivation and reading comprehension. Child Development Perspective, 10(3), 190-195. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12184
Xie, W., Richards, J. E., Lei, D., Lee, K., & Gong, Q. (2015). Comparison of the brain development trajectory between Chinese and U.S. children and adolescents. Frontiers in System Neuroscience, doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00249
Yang, C., & Bai, L. (2019). The use of metacognitive strategies by Chinese Phd students of social sciences in Australian Universities. International Journal of Educational Research, 97: 43-52.
Yang, J., Peng, J., Zhang, D., Zheng, L., & Mo, L. (2017). Specific effects of working memory training on the reading skills of Chinese children with developmental dyslexia. PLoS ONE, 12(11): e0186114.
Yang, Z. (2016). Study on Factors Affecting Learning Strategies in Reading Comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(3): 586-590, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0703.21.
Yeari, M. (2017). The role of working memory in inference generation during reading comprehension: Retention, (re)activation, or suppression of verbal information. Learning and Individual Differences, 56:1-12.
Zhussupova, R., & Kazbekova, M. (2016). Metacognitive strategies as points in teaching reading comprehension. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228 (2016) 593 – 600
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
