A Comparison Differences in Students’ Perceptions Toward Using Teacher’s Feedback
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i1.28514Keywords:
Students’ perceptions, Teacher’s feedbackAbstract
This study aims to compare their perceptions between gender and their age toward using the teachers’ feedback in their classroom. This study applied a quantitative method with survey method, which allowed the data to be quantified and analyzed using statistical analysis. In collecting the data, the Questionnaire Feedback, Identification, School Trajectories that measure their perceptions about Effective Teachers’ Feedback (EFT) and Ineffective Teachers’ Feedback (IEFT) have been used. The samples are 125 students, who are 53 boys and 72 girls, also 17 and 18 years old. The data are analyzed by descriptive statistics. The findings showed that there were statistically significant differences perceptions among students across their genders (p≤0.001) on EFT perceived. Furthermore, there is a significant difference between 17 years old students and 18 years old students (p≥0.05) on EFT perceived. As the result, the students’ gender and their age have main effect, with girls perceiving are more effective than boys, which leads them to report receiving more feedback from their teachers when compared to boys, and 18 years old students’ percept more than 17 years old students on teachers’ feedback toward their reading achievement.
References
Akyol, H., & Boyaci-Altinay, Y. (2019). Reading Difficulty and its Remediation: A Case Study. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1269–1286. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.1269.
Al-Jarrah, R., & Al-Ahmad, S. (2012). An Optimality-theoretic Account of Corrective Feedback in Process Writing. Asian EFL Journal, 14(3), 10–40. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/main-editions-new/an-optimality-theoretic-account-of-corrective-feedback-in-process-writing/.
Andi, S. (2014). Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension through Survey, Question, Read, Recite, and Review (SQ3R) Technique. English Education Journal, 5(2), 1–18. http://jurnal.stkipkusumanegara.ac.id/index.php/semnara2020/article/view/808.
Asnawi., Zulfikar., & I. (2017). Students’ Perception of Oral Corrective Feedback in Speaking Classes. English Education Journal (EEJ), 8(3), 275–291. http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/EEJ/article/view/8918.
Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers’ reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003620019.
Brookhart, S. M. (2012). Preventing Feedback Fizzle. Educational Leadership.
Carless, D. (2007). Conceptualizing Pre-emptive Formative Assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701478412.
Carvalho, C., Conboy, J., Santos, J., Fonseca, J., Tavares, D., Martins, D., … Gama, A. P. (2015). An Integrated Measure of Student Perceptions of Feedback, Engagement and School Identification. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.896.
Carvalho et al. (2014). Teachers’ Feedback: Exploring Differences in Students’ Perceptions. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.351.
Edmunds, C. E. R., Milton, F., & Wills, A. J. (2015). Feedback can be superior to observational training for both rule-based and information-integration category structures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.978875
Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective Feedback and Teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054.
Else-Quest et al. (2006). Gender Differences in Temperament: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 33–72. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.33.
Esra C., & Sabri, S. (2018). Reading Comprehension Skills in Terms of the Sentiments Given in Reading Texts. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 7(4), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v7.i4.
Fakhrul A., Sofyan A.G., B. D. (2019). Lecturers’ Feedback in Speaking Class (A Descriptive Study at Ar-Raniry State Islamic). English Education Journal (EEJ), 10(4), 447–472. http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/EEJ/article/view/14983.
Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? In F. Hyland & K. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 81–102). Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, Dana. (2015). Written corrective feedback in L2 writing: Connors & Lunsford (1988); Lunsford & Lunsford (2008); Lalande (1982). Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444815000257.
Freedberg, M., Glass, B., Filoteo, J. V., Hazeltine, E., & Maddox, W. T. (2017). Comparing the effects of positive and negative feedback in information-integration category learning. Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0638-3.
Galea, J. M., Mallia, E., Rothwell, J., & Diedrichsen, J. (2015). The dissociable effects of punishment and reward on motor learning. Nature Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3956.
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Does your assessment support your students’ learning? Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1(1). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.201.2281&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Hartshorn et al. (2010). Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 44(1), 84–109. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.213781.
Hattie. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Hattie. (2011). Research for Teachers Hattie ’ s concept of visible teaching and learning. Reasearch for Teachers. www.gtce.org.uk.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
Havnes et al. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001.
Hong, L., & Qingying, L. (2007). The Role of Revision and Teacher Feedback in a Chinese College Context. Asian EFL Journal, 9(4), 230–239. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/main-editions-new/the-role-of-revision-and-teacher-feedback-in-a-chinese-college-context/.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399.
Junqueira, L., & Payant, C. (2015). “I just want to do it right, but it’s so hard”: A novice teacher’s written feedback beliefs and practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 19–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.11.001.
Krish, P. (2006). The Power of Feedback in an Online Learning Environment. 3L: Journal of Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature, 12, 95–106. https://ejournals.ukm.my/3l/article/download/1086/982.
Lee, I. (2003). How Do Hong Kong English Teachers Correct Errors in Writing? Education Journal, 31(1), 153–169. https://www.academia.edu/download/54436549/How_Do_Hong_Kong_English_Teachers_correct_errors_in_writing.pdf.
Leh, Ling Ying; Bin Ibrahim, Z. H. (2019). The Influence Of Feedback Environment Towards Job Satisfaction In Tvet Education Organization. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI), 8(1), 96–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v8i1.16471.
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Factors affecting second language learning in C.N Candlin and N. Mercer. In English language teaching in its social context (pp. 28–43).Routledge.
Mack, L. (2009). Issues and Dilemmas: What Conditions are Necessary for Effective Teacher Written Feedback for ESL Learners? Polyglossia, 16, 33–39. https://ritsumei.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=11622&item_no=1&attribute_id=22&file_no=1.
Madani., & H. (2016). The Effects of Reading Skills on the Development of Language Proficiency. Abou Bakr Belkaid-Tlemcen.
O’Donnell, M. E. (2014). Peer response with process-oriented, standards-based writing for beginning-level, second language learners of Spanish. Hispania, 97(3), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpn.2014.0083.
Patthey-Chavez, G.G., & Ferris, D. . (1997). Writing conferences and the weaving of multivoiced texts in college composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 31(1), 51–90. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40171264.
Phuong, T.T.,& Huan, N. . (2018). Teacher corrective feedback on students’ speaking performance and their uptake in EFL classes. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(3), 573–595. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1321246.
Rakoczy, K., Harks, B., Klieme, E., Blum, W., & Hochweber, J. (2013). Written feedback in mathematics: Mediated by students’ perception, moderated by goal orientation. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.002.
Safak, P, Yilmaz, H. C., Demiryurek, P., & Dogus, M. (2016). The Effect of Performance Feedback Provided to Student-Teachers Working with Multiple Disabilities. European Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.5.3.109.
Sen, N. . (2017). The Role of Feedback in Employee Performance Improvement. The University of Liverpool.
Shute, V. (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795.
Silver, R., & Lee, S. (2007). What does it take to make a change? Teacher feedback and student revisions. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(1), 25–49. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ832137.
Sprouls, K. (2011). Teachers' use of positive and negative feedback with students who are high-risk for emotional behavioral disorders. Arizona State University.
Sumarno, Setyosari, P., & H. (2017). Effect of feedback strategy and motivation of achievement to improving learning results concept in learning civic education in vocational high school. European Journal of Educational Research, 6(4), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.6.4.441.
Valente, M.O., Conboy, J., & Carvalho, C. (2009). Student voices on how engagement is influenced by teacher’s communication of evaluation results. The European Conference on Educational Research, 28–30. Vienna.
Wasding, R. (2013). Feedback expressions used by an English teacher of Tour and Travel Department. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v3i1.190.
Wood et al. (2011). Audio feedback for student writing in online nursing courses: exploring student and instructor reactions. The Journal of Nursing Education, 50(9), 540–543. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20110616-04.
Yoke et al. (2013). The use of online corrective feedback in academic writing by L1 Malay learners. English Language Teaching, 6(12), 175–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n12p175.
Zuhana et al. (2014). Critical Reading Ability and its Relation to L2 Proficiency of Malaysian ESL Learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 20(2), 43–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2014-2002-04.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
