Students' Misconceptions: Viewed from Students' Perceptions on Magnetic Field Learning

Authors

  • Maison Maison Jambi University
  • Dwi Agus Kurniawan Jambi University
  • Fauziah Yolviansyah Jambi University
  • Rizka Octavia Sandra Jambi University
  • Muhammad Iqbal Jambi University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v11i3.43752

Abstract

Misconceptions are errors in connecting concepts that result in understanding new ideas and concepts in students' minds into wrong concepts. This study aims to analyze the effect of critical thinking skills on misconceptions in magnetic field material. The research method used in this study is mixed method. In this study, the sampling technique used was a simple random sampling technique to take the sample from the population. The sample used was 30 students taken randomly through a lottery, so 30 students were obtained as samples.  The data collection instruments used in this study were interview sheets and questionnaires. The research design used was a sequential explanatory design. From the descriptive results of the misconceptions data, it is found that the mean of students' misconceptions is 3.59, which means that students' misconceptions are still relatively low. The descriptive results of critical thinking skills data show that the mean of critical thinking skills is 64.03, which means students' critical thinking skills are in a good category. The regression coefficient indicates an influence of critical thinking skills on misconceptions that can be seen from F_ = 28,740 with a significance/probability level of 0.001 < 0.05. It was concluded that there was an effect of critical thinking skills on misconceptions, seen from the higher the value of critical thinking skills, the lower students experiencing misconceptions.

References

Agustina, I., Astuti, D., Bhakti, Y. B., & Prasetya, R. (2021). Four Tier-Magnetic Diagnostic Test ( 4T-MDT ): Instrumen Evaluasi Medan Magnet Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa. JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah), 5(2), 110–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v5i2.1205.

Alhalhinduan, S. S. R., Kurniawan, Y., & Mulyani, R. (2016). Identifikasi Kuantitas Siswa Yang Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Three Tier- Test Pada Materi Listrik Dinamis. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 1(1), 29–31. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v3i2.578.

Amelia, N. F., & Pujiastuti, E. (2016). Kemampuan berpikir kritis dan rasa ingin tahu melalui model pbl. Seminar Nasional Matematika X Universitas Negeri Semarang 2016, 0(0), 523–531. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/21571.

Amelia, S. R., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Melalui Tugas Open-Ended. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 3(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v3i3.247-258.

Ariani, R. F. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kristis Siswa Sd Pada Muatan IPA. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(3), 422–432. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v4i3.28165.

Ashari, L. H., Lestari, W., & Hidayat, T. (2016). Instrumen Penilaian Unjuk Kerja Siswa Smp Kelas Viii Dengan Model Peer Asssessment Berbasis Android Pada Pembelajaran Penjasorkes Dalam Permainan Bola Voli. Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation, 5(1), 08–20. https://doi.org/10.15294/jrer.v5i1.14876.

Astuti, A. P., Aziz, A., Sumarti, S. S., & Bharati, D. A. L. (2019). Preparing 21st Century Teachers: Implementation of 4C Character’s Pre-Service Teacher through Teaching Practice. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012109.

Choirun, N., & Anggana, A. Y. (2014). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Ict Menggunakan Multisim10 Simulations Pada Mata Pelajaran Teknik Elektronika Dasar Di Smk Negeri 7 Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 3(2), 311–317. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/17/article/view/8621.

Dwi, I. V., Rahayu, Y., & Erman. (2013). Penerapan pendekatan Contextual Teaching And Learning(CTL) Untuk Meningkatkan Miskonsepsi Siswa SMP Pada Materi Fotosintesis. Jurnal Pendidikan S Ains E-Pensa, 01(02), 21–29. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa/article/view/2212.

Ernst, J., & Monroe, M. (2007). The effects of environment-based education on students’ critical thinking skills and disposition toward critical thinking. Environmental Education Research, 10(4), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462042000291038.

Firdaus, A., Nisa, L. C., & Nadhifah, N. (2019). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Materi Barisan dan Deret Berdasarkan Gaya Berpikir. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 10(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v10i1.17822.

Hasnawati, Niswatul, B., & Oktavianti, I. (2021). Analisis Hubungan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Dengan Kecenderungan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Syntax Transformation, 2(6), 768–773. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46799/jurnal syntax transformation.v2i6.305 2721-2769.

Hidayati, A. R., Fadly, W., & Ekapti, R. F. (2021). Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 1(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.21154/jtii.v1i1.68.

Hussin, H., Jiea, P. Y., Rosly, R. N. R., & Omar, S. R. (2019). Integrated 21st century science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) education through robotics project-based learning. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(2), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7222.

Iqbal, M., Darmaji, Kurniawan, D. A., Ginting, A. A. B., Aldila, F. T., Putri, W. A., Maryani, S., & Ratnawati, T. (2022). Hubungan persepsi Siswa Dalam Penggunaan Web-Based Assessment Dengan Karakter Siswa di SMON 2 Batanghari. JPE(Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama), 9(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v9i1.1693.

Jolley, D., Davis, M., Lavender, A. P., & Roberts, L. (2020). An online critical thinking course reduces misconceptions in the knowledge of personal trainers. Studies in Continuing Education, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2020.1738373.

Kizilcik, H. Ş., Çelİkkanli, N. Ö., & Güneş, B. (2015). Change of Physics Teacher Candidates ’ Misconceptions on Regular Circular Motion by Time. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(1), 205–223. https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/publication/paper/detail/TVRrMk1qRTRPQT09.

Leasa, M., Corebima, A. D., & Batlolona, J. R. (2020). The effect of learning styles on the critical thinking skills in natural science learning of elementary school students. Elementary Education Online, 19(4), 2086–2097. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.763449.

Lemmer, M., Kriek, J., & Erasmus, B. (2020). Analysis of Students’ Conceptions of Basic Magnetism from a Complex Systems Perspective. Research in Science Education, 50(2), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9693-z.

Maharani, L., Rahayu, D. I., Amaliah, E., Rahayu, R., & Saregar, A. (2019). Diagnostic Test with Four-Tier in Physics Learning: Case of Misconception in Newton’s Law Material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012022.

Mahdalena, M., & Daulay, M. I. (2020). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Saintifik Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Komunikasi Verbal Siswa Sma. Journal on Teacher Education, 2(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.31004/jote.v2i1.903.

Maison, Lestari, N., & Widaningtyas, A. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Tingkat Pemahaman Mahasiswa Tadris Fisika pada Materi Listrik Dinamis Menggunakan 3-Tier Diagnostic Test. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v3i2.9911.

Maryam, E. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Three-Tier Diagnostic Test Berbasis Google Form pada Pokok Bahasan Potensial Listrik. Silampari Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Fisika, 2(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.31540/sjpif.v2i2.1083.

Mason, M. (2007). Critical thinking and learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(4), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00343.x.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications.

Missa, L., Mellu, R. N. K., & Langtang, D. (2020). Pengembangan Alat Evaluasi Fisika Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri Oenino. Jurnal Fisika Indonesia, 24(3), 164. https://doi.org/10.22146/jfi.v24i3.57639.

Mubarak, S., & Yahdi, Y. (2020). Identifying undergraduate students’ misconceptions in understanding acid base materials. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23193.

Murni, D. (2013). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Substansi Genetika Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Prosiding Semirata FMIPA Universitas Lampung, 1(1), 205–212. https://jurnal.fmipa.unila.ac.id/semirata/article/view/671.

Negoro, R. A., Hidayah, H., Rusilowati, A., & Subali, B. (2018). Upaya Membangun Ketrampilan Berpikir Kritis Menggunakan Peta Konsep Untuk Mereduksi Miskonsepsi Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan (Teori Dan Praktik), 3(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.26740/jp.v3n1.p45-51.

Nurrokhmanti, H., Claramita, M., & Utomo, P. S. (2016). Among Students’ Internal Factors, Should Motivation be Used as One of Recruitmen for Admission of Medical Students in Indonesia? Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education, 5(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25316.

Nurulwati, N., Veloo, A., & Ali, R. (2014). Suatu Tinjauan Tentang Jenis-Jenis Dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 2(1), 87–95. http://e-repository.unsyiah.ac.id/JPSI/article/view/7636.

Okolie, U. C., Igwe, P. A., Mong, I. K., Nwosu, H. E., Kanu, C., & Ojemuyide, C. C. (2021). Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills through engagement with innovative pedagogical practices in Global South. Higher Education Research and Development, 0(0), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1896482.

Purawati, R., Hobri., & Fatahillah, A. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Bepikir Kritis dalam menyelesaikan masalah persamaan Kuadrat pada pembelajaran Model Creative Problem Solving. Kadikma, 7(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.35.791.

Purba, E. F., & Simanjuntak, P. (2011). Metode Penelitian. percetakan SADIA.

Rahmatih, A. N., Fauzi, A., & Ermiana, I. (2020). Hubungan Motivasi dan Kemandirian Belajar Mahasiswa Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar. Wahana Sekolah Dasar, 28(2), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.17977/um035v28i22020p076.

Ramadhan, D., Bobby, I., Ashnam, M., Alfianda, R., Marpaung, M. A., & Sugihartono, I. (2019). Studi Miskonsepsi Medan Magnet Menggunakan Metode Fourt-Tier Test untuk siswa SMA Kelas XII. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika, VIII(0), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.21009/03.SNF2019.

Rini, E. F. S., Wibisono, G., Ramadhanti, A., Simamora, N. N., & Chen, D. (2020). Pengaruh Kemandirian Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XI di SMA Negeri 11 Kota Jambi. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 6(2), 256–263. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v6i2.2211.

Rositawati, D. N. (2018). Kajian Berpikir Kritis Pada Metode Inkuiri. Prosiding SNFA (Seminar Nasional Fisika Dan Aplikasinya), 3, 74. https://doi.org/10.20961/prosidingsnfa.v3i0.28514.

Safriana, & Irfan, A. (2021). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Three Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test Pada Materi Gerak Dan Gaya. Al-Madaris Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Keislaman, 2(2), 2021. https://doi.org/10.47887/amd.v2i2.33.

Sandra, R. O., Iqbal, M., & Abimantara, A. Y. (2021). Pengaruh Kedisiplinan Siswa Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Di Kelas X. Edutainment, 8(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.35438/e.v8i2.323.

Saputri, D. F., & Nurussaniah. (2015). Penyebab Miskonsepsi Pada Optika Geometris. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fiisika SNF 2015, 4(0), 33–36. http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/prosidingsnf/article/view/5022.

Setyaningsih, E., Harijanto, A., Handono, S., & Prastowo, B. (2018). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Materi Medan Magnet Menggunakan Three Tier Test Pada Siswa Kelas Xii Sma Di Jember. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 3(00), 2527–5917. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/fkip-epro/article/download/7391/5290.

Sholihat, F. N., Samsudin, A., & Nugraha, M. G. (2017). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Pada Sub-Materi Fluida Dinamik: Azas Kontinuitas. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.03208.

Soeharto, Csapó, B., Sarimanah, E., Dewi, F. I., & Sabri, T. (2019). A review of students’ common misconceptions in science and their diagnostic assessment tools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.18649.

Spector, J. M., & Ma, S. (2019). Inquiry and critical thinking skills for the next generation: from artificial intelligence back to human intelligence. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0088-z.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. In Bandung:Alfabeta.

Sujito, & Pebriana, irvany nurita. (2018). Studens misconception: yhe developing of socratic dialogue memdia on tempetarure heat. Jurnal Pena Sains, 5(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21107/jps.v5i2.4551.

Susilawati, E., Agustinasari, A., Samsudin, A., & Siahaan, P. (2020). Analisis Tingkat Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 6(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v6i1.1453.

Tanti, T., Darmaji, D., Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D. A., & Iqbal, M. (2021). Analysis of User Responses to the Application of Web-Based Assessment on Character Assessment. Journal of Education Technology, 5(3), 356. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i3.33590.

Tanti, T., Kurniawan, D. A., Firmansyah, R., & Zain, M. S. (2021). Correlation Between Reading Fondness and Attitude Toward Science at Middle School. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i1.24701.

Tejedor, G., Segalàs, J., Barrón, Á., Fernández-Morilla, M., Fuertes, M. T., Ruiz-Morales, J., Gutiérrez, I., García-González, E., Aramburuzabala, P., & Hernández, À. (2019). Didactic strategies to promote competencies in sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(7), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072086.

Turkmen, H., & USTA, E. (2016). Student misconceptions about force and acceleration in physics and engineering mechanics education. Kastamonu Education Journal, 13(2), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022034.

Wahyudi, I., Maharta, N., & Lampung, U. (2013). Pemahaman konsep dan miskonsepsi fisika pada guru fisika sma rsbi di bandar lampung. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 14(1), 18–32. http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/2415.

Widyaningsih, S. W., Yusuf, I., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Istiyono, E. (2020). Online Interactive Multimedia Oriented to HOTS through E-Learning on Physics Material about Electrical Circuit. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i1.17667.

Wirantasa, U. (2017). Pengaruh Kedisiplinan Siswa Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 7(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v7i1.1272.

Yuliati, Y. (2017). Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Serta Remediasinya. Bio Educatio, 2(2), 50–58. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/228883658.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-25

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 3 (2022): September

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)