Diagnostic Tests Based on Three Level Tests on Fixed Materials for Students with Misconceptions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v11i4.50452Keywords:
mathematics education, Three-Tier diagnostic test, MisconceptionAbstract
Misconception is something that can hinder the acceptance of new material and affect success in solving math problems. This study aims to develop a Three-Tier diagnostic test to identify misconceptions. The development of this test aims to identify the types of errors in the set and describe the quality of this diagnostic test. The research conducted was the plomp development model research, which is a model widely used for the development of educational products such as teaching materials, media, or learning approaches. The population in this study were students of mathematics education. Data analysis performed included validity, reliability, level of difficulty, discriminating power, questionnaire analysis, interpretation of three-level multiple-choice diagnostic test results, and profile analysis of students' understanding of students. The results of this study obtained a diagnostic test that can find out conceptual errors in students who have been tested for validity and declared valid. So that it can be concluded that the diagnostic test instrument for the set material in this study includes; diagnostic test grids, diagnostic test questions, answer key sheets and diagnostic test rubrics, diagnostic test answer sheets, diagnostic test kit validation sheets, diagnostic test sheets have been generated.
References
Adrianto, O. M., Candramila, W., & Ariyati, E. (2017). Analisis Konsepsi Dan Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas Xii Ipa Sma Don Boso Sanggau Pada Materi Evolusi. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Untan, 3(1), 1–9. http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/Index.Php/Jpdpb/Article/View/19732.
Agustina, I., Astuti, D., Bhakti, Y. B., & Prasetya, R. (2021). Four Tier-Magnetic Diagnostic Test ( 4T-MDT ): Instrumen Evaluasi Medan Magnet Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa. JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah), 5(2), 110–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v5i2.1205.
Aldila, F. T., Wirayuda, R. P., Wulandari, M., & Ningsi, A. P. (2020). Description Of Science Process Skills Of Sman 10 Muaro Jambi’s Students On The Equilibrium Material On The Rope. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.22611/jpf.v9i2.21494.
Amin, A., Kurniawan, D., Chen, D., & Wirayuda, R. (2022). Servation of Bengkulu local wisdom: The application of Syarafal Anam in preventing student radicalism. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 931–948. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1355557.
Amrina, Z., Zuzano, F., & Wahyuni, Y. (2020). Development Of Problem-Based Mathematic Learning Model To Improve Creative Thinking Ability Of Elementary Teacher Education Students, Bung Hatta University. Journal Of Physics: Conference Series, 1554(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1554/1/012068.
Andriani, E., Indrawati, & Harijanto, A. (2015). Remedi Miskonsepsi Beberapa Konsep Listrik Dinamis pada Siswa SMA Melalui Simulasi PhET Disertai LKS. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 3(4), 362–369. https://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/59895.
Apriyanto, D., Irawati, T. N., & Al’Ayubi, S. (2022). Miskonsepsi Konsep Matematika Menggunakan Metode Certainty Response Index (CRI) pada Pembelajaran dalam Jaringan. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 5673–5684. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3110.
Atiqoh, K. S. N., & Hafiz, M. (2021). Miskonsepsi mahasiswa pada induksi matematika menggunakan certainty of response index (CRI). Jurnal Padegogik, 4(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.35974/jpd.v4i2.2536.
Dewi, S. Z., & Ibrahim, T. (2019). Pentingnya Pemahaman Konsep Untuk Mengatasi Miskonsepsi Dalam Materi Belajar Ipa Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Garut, 13(1), 130–136. https://journal.uniga.ac.id/Index.Php/Jp/Article/View/823.
Didik, L. A., Wahyudi, M., & Kafrawi, M. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Tingkat Pemahaman Mahasiswa Tadris Fisika pada Materi Listrik Dinamis Menggunakan 3-Tier Diagnostic Test. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 3(2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v3i2.9911.
Ebitz, R. B., & Hayden, B. Y. (2021). The population doctrine in cognitive neuroscience. Neuron, 109(19), 3055–3068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.07.011.
Fatonah, U., Wirayuda, R. P., Wibisono, G., & Sakahuni, S. (2020). Analisis Minat Belajar Kelas Xi Sma Negeri 1 Sungai Penuh Pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Sains Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 16(2), 145–152. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/485300-none-dd5ce2e5.pdf.
Harahap, I. P. P., & Novita, D. (2020). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen tes diagnostik four-tier multiple choice (4TMC) pada konsep laju reaksi. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 9(2), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v9n2.p222-227.
Hasibuan, A. M., Saragih, S., & Amry, Z. (2018). Development Of Learning Materials Based On Realistic Mathematics Education To Improve Problem Solving Ability And Student Learning Independence. International Electronic Journal Of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.29333/Iejme/4000.
Irawan, E., & Wilujeng, H. (2020). Development of an online mathematical misconception instrument. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012080.
Izza, R. I., Nurhamidah, N., & Elvinawati, E. (2021). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Esai Berbantuan Cri (Certainty Of Response Index) Pada Pokok Bahasan Asam Basa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Kimia, 5(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.33369/Atp.V5i1.16487.
Juhji, J. (2017). Upaya Mengatasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Sistem Saraf Melalui Penggunaan Peta Konsep. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Mipa, 7(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.30998/Formatif.V7i1.1200.
Kirbulut, Z. D., & Geban, O. (2014). Using Three-Tier Diagnostic Test To Assess Students’ Misconceptions Of States Of Matter. Eurasia Journal Of Mathematics, Science And Technology Education, 10(5), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.12973/Eurasia.2014.1128a.
Korganci, N., Miron, C., Dafinei, A., & Antohe, S. (2015). The Importance of Inquiry-Based Learning on Electric Circuit Models for Conceptual Understanding. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2463–2468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.530.
Latifah, U., Lalili, Wakhyudin, H., & Cahyadi, F. (2020). Miskonsepsi Penyelesaian Soal Cerita Matematika Materi Fpb Dan Kpk Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 181–195. https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/jrpd/article/view/4078.
Maharani, L., Rahayu, D. I., Amaliah, E., Rahayu, R., & Saregar, A. (2019). Diagnostic Test with Four-Tier in Physics Learning: Case of Misconception in Newton’s Law Material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012022.
Maison, Lestari, N., & Widaningtyas, A. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Usaha dan Energi. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA), 6(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.314.
Manurung, M. M., Windria, H., & Arifin, S. (2019). Desain Pembelajaran Materi Himpunan Dengan Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education (Rme) Untuk Kelas Vii. Jurnal Derivat: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.31316/J.Derivat.V5i1.143.
Mariamah, M., Ratnah, R., Katimah, H., Rahman, A., & Haris, A. (2021). Analysis Of Students’ Perceptions Of Mathematics Subjects: Case Studies In Elementary Schools. Journal Of Physics: Conference Series, 1933(1), 012074. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012074.
Maslihah, S., Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, & Suyitno, A. (2020). The Role Of Mathematical Literacy To Improve High Order Thinking Skills. Journal Of Physics: Conference Series, 1539(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1539/1/012085
Morocho-Lara, D., Páez-Quinde, C., Neto-Chusín, H., & Suárez-Mosquera, W. (2022). The flipped classroom in meaningful mathematics learning: case study eighth year of basic general education. In 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1539–1543. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766489.
Mubarak, S., Susilaningsih, E., & Cahyono, E. (2016). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Three Tier Multiple Choice Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Kelas Xi. Journal Of Innovative Science Education, 5(2), 101–110. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise/article/view/14258.
Mukhlisa, N. (2021). Miskonsepsi Pada Peserta Didik. Speed Journal : Journal Of Special Education, 4(2), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.31537/Speed.V4i2.403.
Muslim, F., Ekawarna, E., Ramalia, A., Wirayuda, R. P., & Chen, D. (2022). Learning Intensity and Visual Learning Style on Learning Outcomes. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i2.40312.
Muttaqin, H., Susanto, H., & Tohir, M. (2021). Students’ Creative Thinking Skills In Solving Mathematics Higher Order Thinking Skills (Hots) Problems Based On Online Trading Arithmetic. Journal Of Physics: Conference Series, 1832(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012036.
Nazura Saputri, S. D., & Anggreni, L. (2021). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Three Tier Test Pada Materi Suhu Dan Kalor Untuk Smp. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Aplikasinya (Jpsa), 4(2), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1053/J.Gastro.2014.05.023.
Nur’aini, I. L., Harahap, E., Badruzzaman, F. H., & Darmawan, D. (2017). Pembelajaran Matematika Geometri Secara Realistis Dengan GeoGebra. Matematika, 16(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.29313/jmtm.v16i2.3900.
Nurwahida, N., & Munir, N. P. (2022). Analisis Miskonsepsi Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar pada Matakuliah Konsep Dasar Matematika dengan Menggunakan Three-Tier Diagnostic Test Dilengkapi Certainty Of Response Index. Judikdas: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 1(3), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.51574/judikdas.v1i3.455.
Permatasari, I. S., Hendracipta, N., & Pamungkas, A. S. (2019). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Video Animasi Hands Move Dengan Konteks Lingkungan Pada Mapel Ips. Terampil : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Dasar, 6(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.24042/terampil.v6i1.4100.
Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Hertina, A. M. (2019). The Misconception Diagnosis on Ionic and Covalent Bonds Concepts with Three Tier Diagnostic Test. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1477–1488. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1201190.
Putra, I. E., Adlim, & Halim, A. (2016). Analisis Miskonsepsi Dan Upaya Remidiasi Pembelajaran Listrik Dinamis Dengan Menggunakan Media Pembelajaran Lectora Inspire Dan Phet Simulation Di Sman Unggul Tunas Bangsa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 4(2), 13–19. https://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JPSI/article/view/7565.
Ramadoni, A., Yulkifli, & Ratnawulan. (2019). Development of physics module SMA/MA integrated character values based on discovery learning models with approach science process skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012068.
Resta, N. N., Halim, A., & Huda, I. (2020). Development of e-learning-based three-tier diagnostics test on the basic physics course. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1), 012131. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012131.
Rismawati, M. (2016). Mengembangkan Peran Matematika Sebagai Alat Berpikir Ilmiah Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Lesson Study. Vox Edukasi, 7(2), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.31932/ve.v7i2.77.
Rizqi, M. M., Wijayanti, D., & Basir, M. A. (2021). Analisis Buku Teks Matematika Materi Himpunan Menggunakan Model Prakseologi. Delta: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.31941/Delta.V9i1.1226.
Rusilowati, A. (2015). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik sebagai Alat Evaluasi Kesulitan Belajar Fisika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika Dan Pendidikan Fisika (SNFPF), 6(1). https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/prosfis1/article/view/7684.
Sari, D. A., Ellizar, E., & Azhar, M. (2019). Development of problem-based learning module on electrolyte and nonelectrolyte solution to improve critical thinking ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012146.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, R&D dan Penelitian Pendidikan) (3rd ed.). Alfabeta.
Surya, E., & Munawarah, N. (2017). An Analysis Of The Difficulties In Learning Mathematics By Using Scientific Approach At Sma Negeri 3 Manyak Payed View Project Development Of Learning Devices Oriented Problem Based Learning To Increase Student’s Combinatorial Thinking In Mathematical Pro. International Journal Of Sciences: Basic And Applied Research, 33(3), 94–104. http://gssrr.org/Index.Php?Journal=Journalofbasicandapplied.
Suwarti, S., Restu, R., & Hidayat, H. (2019). Interactive Multimedia Development in Social Sciences Subject of Disaster Material at Grade IV SDN. (Public Elementary School) No.024183 East Binjai on 2017/2018. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 2(1), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v2i1.211.
Suwono, H., Prasetyo, T. I., Lestari, U., Lukiati, B., Fachrunnisa, R., Kusairi, S., & Atho’Illah, M. F. (2021). Cell Biology Diagnostic Test (CBD-Test) portrays pre-service teacher misconceptions about biology cell. Journal of Biological Education, 55(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1643765.
Widyastuti, E. (2019). Using the ADDIE model to develop learning material for actuarial mathematics. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), 012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012052.
Wirayuda, R. P., Darmaji, D., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2022). Identification of Science Process Skills and Students’ Creative Thinking Ability In Science Lessons. Attractive: Innovative Education Journal, 4(1), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.51278/aj.v4i1.335.
Wirayuda, R. P., Wandai, R., & Ginting, A. A. B. (2022). Hubungan Sikap Siswa Terhadap Hasil Pembelajaran Fisika SMA N 1 Kota Sungai Penuh. Integrated Science Education Journal, 3(1), 24–27. https://www.cahaya-ic.com/index.php/ISEJ/article/download/172/155.
Wulandari, M., Wirayuda, R. P., Aldila, F., & Wulandari, R. (2020). Description of students’ Integrated Science Process Skills on Friction Material on a Flat Field. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 8(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v8i2.3206.
Yeh, H. C., & Tseng, S. S. (2019). Using the ADDIE model to nurture the development of teachers’ CALL professional knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(3), 88–100. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26896712.
Yuberti, Y., Suryani, Y., & Kurniawati, I. (2020). Four-tier diagnostic test with certainty of response index to identify misconception in physics. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i2.6061.
Yuliati, Y. (2017). Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Serta Remediasinya. Jurnal Bio Education, 2, 50–58. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/228883658.pdf.
Yuniati, S., & Sari, A. (2018). Pengembangan Modul Matematika Terintegrasi Nilai-Nilai Keislaman melalui Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education di Propinsi Riau. Jurnal Analisa, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v4i1.1588.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Kamid Kamid; Roseli Theis; Ranisa Junita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)