The Effect of Reciprocal Teaching Learning Model and Self-Concept on Reading Comprehension Ability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v11i4.52363Keywords:
Reciprocal teaching model, Reading comprehension, Academic self-conceptAbstract
The reading ability of students in the field is still very worrying. This is reinforced by the low ability of students to understand material or questions that require higher-order thinking skills. The low reading comprehension ability can be seen from the low literacy ability of students based on PISA rankings. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the reciprocal teaching model on students' reading comprehension skills in terms of students' self-concept levels. The approach used in this research is quantitative with a quasi-experimental method. The participants of this study were 100 elementary school students who were divided into two groups of 50 students each in the experimental and control groups. Data was collected through reading comprehension tests and observations. Data analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA. The results showed that the Reciprocal Teaching model gave a more significant contribution to students' reading comprehension skills compared to conventional methods, especially for students who had low self-concept. Based on the findings above, it is concluded that the Reciprocal Teaching learning model has an effect on students' reading comprehension skills. Both reciprocal and conventional learning models have the same effect on students who have high self-concept. The implication of this research is that teachers must choose a learning model that can accommodate all students, not only students with high academic abilities, but also students with low academic abilities.
References
Banks, K. (2012). Are Inferential Reading Items More Susceptible to Cultural Bias Than Literal Reading Items? Applied Measurement in Education, 25(3), 220–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2012.687610.
Bezerra, R. L. M., Alves, R. J. R., & Azoni, C. A. S. (2022). Creativity and its relationship with intelligence and reading skills in children: an exploratory study. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-022-00221-3.
Connor, C. M. D., Phillips, B. M., Kim, Y. G., Lonigan, C. J., Kaschak, M. P., Crowe, E., Dombek, J., & Al Otaiba, S. (2018). Examining the Efficacy of Targeted Component Interventions on Language and Literacy for Third and Fourth Graders Who are at Risk of Comprehension Difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(6), 462–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1481409.
Foorman, B. R., Wu, Y. C., Quinn, J. M., & Petscher, Y. (2020). How do latent decoding and language predict latent reading comprehension: across two years in grades 5, 7, and 9? Reading and Writing, 33(9), 2281–2309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10043-3.
Froiland, J. M., & Davison, M. L. (2020). Emotional Intelligence, Listening Comprehension, and Reading Comprehension among Diverse Adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(5), 1385–1390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01557-8.
Gottardo, A., Mirza, A., Koh, P. W., Ferreira, A., & Javier, C. (2018). Unpacking listening comprehension: the role of vocabulary, morphological awareness, and syntactic knowledge in reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 31(8), 1741–1764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9736-2.
Gubbels, J., Swart, N. M., & Groen, M. A. (2020). Everything in moderation: ICT and reading performance of Dutch 15-year-olds. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-0079-0.
Ha, H. T. (2021). Exploring the relationships between various dimensions of receptive vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading comprehension. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00131-8.
Hadianto, D., Damaianti, V. S., Mulyati, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2021a). Does reading comprehension competence determine level of solving mathematical word problems competence? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012049.
Hadianto, D., Damaianti, V. S., Mulyati, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2021b). Enhancing scientific argumentation skill through partnership comprehensive literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2098(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2098/1/012015.
Hadianto, Daris, S. Damaianti, V., Mulyati, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2022). Effectiveness of Literacy Teaching Design Integrating Local Culture Discourse and Activities to Enhance Reading Skills. Cogent Education, 9(1), 0–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2016040.
Hayashi, Y., Seta, K., & Ikeda, M. (2018). Development of a support system for measurement and analysis of thinking processes based on a metacognitive interpretation framework: a case study of dissolution of belief conflict thinking processes. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0091-y.
Hiebert, E. H., & Daniel, M. (2019). Comprehension and rate during silent reading: Why do some students do poorly? Reading and Writing, 32(7), 1795–1818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9917-7.
Justice, L. M., Lomax, R., O’Connell, A., Pentimonti, J., Petrill, S. A., Piasta, S. B., Gray, S., Restrepo, M. A., Cain, K., Catts, H., Bridges, M., Nielsen, D., Hogan, T., Bovaird, J., Nelson, J. R., Jiang, H., & Farquharson, K. (2018). Are working memory and behavioral attention equally important for both reading and listening comprehension? A developmental comparison. Reading and Writing, 31(7), 1449–1477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9840-y.
Kane, S., Lear, M., & Dube, C. M. (2014). Reflections on the role of metacognition in student reading and learning at higher education level. Africa Education Review, 11(4), 512–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2014.935001.
LaRusso, M., Kim, H. Y., Selman, R., Uccelli, P., Dawson, T., Jones, S., Donovan, S., & Snow, C. (2016). Contributions of Academic Language, Perspective Taking, and Complex Reasoning to Deep Reading Comprehension. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1116035.
Lin, J., Li, Q., Sun, H., Huang, Z., & Zheng, G. (2021). Correction to: Chinese secondary school students’ reading engagement profiles: associations with reading comprehension (Reading and Writing, (2021), 34, 9, (2257-2287), 10.1007/s11145-021-10139-4). Reading and Writing, 34(9), 2289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10171-4.
Lyster, S. A. H., Lervåg, A. O., & Hulme, C. (2016). Erratum to: Preschool morphological training produces long-term improvements in reading comprehension (Reading and Writing, DOI: 10.1007/s11145-016-9636-x). Reading and Writing, 29(6), 1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9647-7.
Meijer, J., Sleegers, P., Elshout-Mohr, M., van Daalen-Kapteijns, M., Meeus, W., & Tempelaar, D. (2013). The development of a questionnaire on metacognition for students in higher education. Educational Research, 55(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.767024.
Muijselaar, M. M. L., Swart, N. M., Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & de Jong, P. F. (2017). Developmental Relations Between Reading Comprehension and Reading Strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763
Ozturk, N. (2017). An analysis of teachers’ self-reported competencies for teaching metacognition. Educational Studies, 43(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1273761.
Pacello, J. (2014). Integrating Metacognition into a Developmental Reading and Writing Course to Promote Skill Transfer: An Examination of Student Perceptions and Experiences. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 44(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2014.906240.
Ricchiardi, P., & Emanuel, F. (2018). Soft skill assessment in higher education. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2018-018-ricc.
Samiei, F., & Ebadi, S. (2021). Exploring EFL learners’ inferential reading comprehension skills through a flipped classroom. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00157-9.
Shaari, J. S., Hooi, L. B., & Siswantoyo. (2019). The effectiveness of psychological skills training program on netball shooting performance. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(1), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i1.23206.
Silverman, R. D., Proctor, C. P., Harring, J. R., Hartranft, A. M., Doyle, B., & Zelinke, S. B. (2015). Language skills and reading comprehension in English monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual children in grades 2–5. Reading and Writing, 28(9), 1381–1405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9575-y.
Soto, C., Gutiérrez de Blume, A. P., Jacovina, M., McNamara, D., Benson, N., Riffo, B., & Kruk, R. (2019). Reading comprehension and metacognition: The importance of inferential skills. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1565067.
Susantini, E., Puspitawati, R. P., Raharjo, & Suaidah, H. L. (2021). E-book of metacognitive learning strategies: design and implementation to activate student’s self-regulation. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00161-z.
Tarchi, C. (2017). Comprehending Expository Texts: The Role of Cognitive and Motivational Factors. Reading Psychology, 38(2), 154–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2016.1245229.
Taşçı, S., & Turan, Ü. D. (2021). The Contribution of Lexical Breadth, Lexical Depth, and Syntactic Knowledge to L2 Reading Comprehension Across Different L2 Reading Proficiency Groups. English Teaching and Learning, 45(2), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-020-00065-z.
Wagner, R. K., Beal, B., Zirps, F. A., & Spencer, M. (2021). A model-based meta-analytic examination of specific reading comprehension deficit: how prevalent is it and does the simple view of reading account for it? Annals of Dyslexia, 71(2), 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-021-00232-2.
Wulfemeyer, J. (2019). Modeling Metacognition and Providing Background Knowledge via Guided Reading Videos. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 49(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2018.1514284.
Young, C., Durham, P., Miller, M., Rasinski, T. V., & Lane, F. (2019). Improving reading comprehension with readers theater. Journal of Educational Research, 112(5), 615–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2019.1649240.
Yousuf, M. S., Harvey, H. L., Parahoo, S. K., Ziadeh, B. S., Kilani, M., & Al-Kamil, E. (2021). The effects of pediatric primary prevention programs on screen-time and reading habits of children in Jordan. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-021-00092-8.
Zhao, A., Guo, Y., & Dinnesen, M. S. (2022). The direct and indirect effects of language and cognitive skills on Chinese reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 35(3), 539–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10192-z.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Tanto Aljauharie Tantowie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
