The Effect of the Course Review Horay Learning Model on Students’ Motivation and Learning Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v11i4.54423Keywords:
CRH, Motivation, Learning Outcomes, Cooperative LearningAbstract
The model used is still a conventional approach, it is found that students are still often in and out of class while learning is still ongoing because students' learning motivation is relatively low, often conversing with friends when learning begins, and often disturbing friends. This study aims to analyze the effect of the Course Review Hooray (CRH) learning model on the motivation and learning outcomes of fifth grade students. This research uses a quantitative approach with the Quasi Experimental method. This research uses Nonequivalent Control Group Design. This study has a sample selected by using Non-Probability Sampling. The sample for the experimental class and control class consisted of 14 students. The results showed that the acquisition of the t test of high learning motivation obtained t-count more than t-table, namely 12.89152 more than 2.056, then h0 was rejected and h1 was accepted. Then, the application of the CRH model also affects student learning outcomes which is also proven by the t test. The result of the calculation is t-count more than t-table, which is 9.926846 more than 2.056, so it can be concluded that the CRH learning model has an influence on the learning outcomes of fifth grade students.
References
Adams, T., Koster, B., & Brok, P. den. (2022). Patterns in student teachers’ learning processes and outcomes of classroom management during their internship. Teaching and Teacher Education, 120, 103891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103891.
Aksiwi, & Sagoro. (2014). Implementation of the Course Review Horay Learning Method to Increase Activity and Learning Outcomes. Journal of Education, 12(1), 36–47. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/carjo/article/view/3481.
Aperta, M., Amini, R., Guru, P., & Dasar, S. (2021). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu Bebasis Kvisoft Flipbook Maker Pro di Kelas IV SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(1), 1024–1030. https://www.jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/1066.
Darmaji, Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, Winda, F. R., Heldalia, & Kartina, L. (2020). The Correlation between Student Perceptions of the Use of E- Modules with Students ’ Basic Science Process Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(4), 719–729. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i4.28310.
Encheva, M., Zlatkova, P., Tammaro, A. M., & Brenner, M. (2019). Information Behavior of Humanities Students in Bulgaria, Italy and Sweden: Planning a Game-Based Learning Approach for Avoiding Fake Content. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 989). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13472-3_28.
Ernata, Y. (2017). Analisis Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik Melalui Pemberian Reward Dan Punishment Di Sdn Ngaringan 05 Kec.Gandusari Kab.Blitar. Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pengembangan Sekolah Dasar (JP2SD), 5(2), 781–790. https://doi.org/10.22219/jp2sd.vol5.no2.781-790.
Faheem, S., Uzeir, D., & Yacub, B. (2021). The Effect of the Cooperative Course Review Hooray Learning Model on Students’ Learning Outcomes. Journal La Edusci, 2(3), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallaedusci.v2i3.399.
Gülpinar, M. A. (2005). The Principles of Brain-Based Learning and Constructivist Models in Education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 5(2). https://www.academia.edu/download/8837227/48.pdf.
In’am, A., & Sutrisno, E. S. (2020). Strengthening Students’ Self-efficacy and Motivation in Learning Mathematics through the Cooperative Learning Model. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14123A.
Irawaty, E., Widjaja, E. M., & Sanjaya, J. (2021). Peningkatan Kualitas Belajar Dalam Menghadapi Pembelajaran Daring. Prosiding SENAPENMAS, 985. https://doi.org/10.24912/psenapenmas.v0i0.15131.
Kamaruddin, S. A. (2012). Character Education and Students’ Social Behavior. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/295346288.pdf.
Kim, J. S., Relyea, J. E., Burkhauser, M. A., Scherer, E., & Rich, P. (2021). Improving Elementary Grade Students’ Science and Social Studies Vocabulary Knowledge Depth, Reading Comprehension, and Argumentative Writing: a Conceptual Replication. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09609-6.
Krissandi, A. D. S., & Rusmawan, R. (2015). Kendala Guru Sekolah Dasar Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 3(3), 457–467. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v3i3.7409.
Kusfabianto, I. J., Kristin, F., & Anugraheni, I. (2019). Penerapan model pembelajaran Course Review Horay untuk meningkatkan keaktifan dan hasil belajar matematika kelas IV SD. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 3(2), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v3i2.992.
Marhadi, H., Lazim, N., Erlisnawati, E., & Purnama, N. (2018). Effect of cooperative learning model type course review Horay (CRH) on elementary students’ learning outcome in social subject. Journal of Teaching and Learning in Elementary Education (JTLEE), 1(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.33578/jtlee.v1i1.5390.
Maulidin, M., Utama, A., & Indah, P. P. (2020). Student motivation in thematic learning at elementary schools. Southeast Asian Journal of Islamic Education, 9(01), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.21093/sajie.v3i1.2877.
Mazid, S., Futaqi, S., & Farikah, F. (2021). The Concept of “Freedom of Learning” In A Multicultural Education Perspective. Ta’dib, 24(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v24i1.2759.
Nurlaela, L., Samani, M., Asto, I. G. P., & Wibawa, S. C. (2018). The effect of thematic learning model, learning style, and reading ability on the students’ learning outcomes. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 296(1), 0–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/296/1/012039.
Rahmatih, A. N., Fauzi, A., & Ermiana, I. (2020). Hubungan Motivasi dan Kemandirian Belajar Mahasiswa Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar. Wahana Sekolah Dasar, 28(2), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.17977/um035v28i22020p076.
Rahmawati, F., & Prasetyo, Z. (2019). Why Should Course Review Horay? In 6th International Conference on Educational Research and Innovation (ICERI 2018), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2991/iceri-18.2019.53.
Rilianti, A. P. (2019). Inkuiri Dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pena Karakter, 1(2), 41. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/228759449.pdf.
Sekarwangi, T., Sartono, K. E., Mustadi, A., & Abdulah, A. (2021). The Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning-Based Interactive Multimedia for Elementary School Students. International Journal of Elementary Education, 5(2), 308. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v5i2.31603.
Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitaif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Jakarta: Alfabeta.
Suitriani, N. W., Arini, N. W., & Garminah, N. N. (2016). Penerapan Model Course Review Horay Berbantuan Media Monopoli Untuk Meningkatkan Keaktifan Dan Hasil Belajar Ipa. Mimbar PGSD Undiksha, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v4i1.7271.
Surur, M., & Tartilla, T. (2019). Pengaruh Problem Based Learning Dan Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. Indonesian Journal of Learning Education and Counseling, 1(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.31960/ijolec.v1i2.96.
Taştan, S. B., Mehdi, S., Davoudi, M., Masalimova, A. R., Bersanov, A. S., Kurbanov, R. A., Boiarchuk, A. V, & Pavlushin, A. A. (2018). The Impacts of Teacher’s Efficacy and Motivation on Student’s Academic Achievement in Science Education among Secondary and High School Students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2353–2366. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89579.
Ufie, A., Leuwol, F. S., & Mainake, A. B. (2020). Increasing social sciences learning achievement and activeness through course review horay model. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 8(2), 115–125. https://scholar.archive.org/work/6gix7vomjrdllj2xlduqiq22ay/access/wayback/https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpe/article/download/33135/pdf.
Wachidi, W., Rodgers, A., & Tumanov, D. Y. (2020). Professional Competence Understanding Level of Elementary School in Implementing Curriculum 2013. International Journal of Educational Review, 2(1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.33369/ijer.v2i1.10642.
Wahyudi, M. D., & Tripuspitaningrum, G. (2018). Improving students learning outcome using group investigation model combined with think pair share and course review horay. In 1st International Conference on Creativity, Innovation and Technology in Education (IC-CITE 2018), 142–146.
Wahyuni, L. T. S., Japa, I. G. N., & Rati, N. W. (2020). Correlation of Reading Interests and Learning Motivation Toward Science Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(3), 484. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v4i3.25376.
Yao, Y., Wang, P., Jiang, Y. J., Li, Q., & Li, Y. (2022). Innovative online learning strategies for the successful construction of student self-awareness during the COVID-19 pandemic: Merging TAM with TPB. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(4), 100252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100252.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Selfi Rahmi Andini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
