An Application of Classical Test Theory for Item Characteristic Analysis of Chemical Literacy Instruments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpki.v7i2.68983Kata Kunci:
literasi kimia, instrumen penilaian, teori tes klasik, laju reaksi, classical test theory, chemical literacy, Assessment Instrument, reaction rate, Chemical literacy, Assessment Instrument, Classical Test Theory, Reaction RateAbstrak
The science literacy skills of students in Indonesia are very concerning, the cause is that students are not accustomed to working on questions based on science literacy, so it is necessary to have a standardized assessment instrument based on chemical literacy that can measure the level of achievement of scientific identification and interpret science/chemistry learning. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of chemical literacy-based assessment instrument items of reaction rate material with a classical test theory approach. The type of research is descriptive quantitative. The research subjects were 80 class XI MIPA SMA Negeri 4 Takalar students. Data were analyzed using the ITEMAN 4.3 program. Based on the results of the analysis, a reliability coefficient of 0.834 was obtained, the level of favorability of 87% of the items was in the moderate category, and 13% was in the difficult category. In the difference test, as many as 73% of the items are in the very good category, and for the distractor test, 93% of all items have shown distractors that function properly, so it can be concluded that overall the items have high reliability and good item characteristics.
Referensi
Abell, S. K., & Siegel, M. A. (2011). Assessment literacy: What science teachers need to know and be able to do? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, R. Gunstone (Eds.). The professional knowledge based of science teaching. Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3927-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3927-9_12
Agustiawan, H., & Puspitasari, E. D. (2019). Pembentukan karakter siswa SMP melalui literasi sains. Symposium of Biology Education (Symbion), https://doi.org/10.26555/symbion.3548 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26555/symbion.3548
Arikunto, S. (2016). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, S. (2017). Pengembangan instrument penelitian dan penilaian program. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Atika, A. R., Westhisi, S. M., & Zahro, I. F. (2019). Pelatihan literasi sains untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir ilmiha pada guru Pendidikan anak usia dini. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Undiksha. 7(3), 266-271. https://doi.org/10.23887/paud.v7i3.22297
Bond, D. (1989). In pursuit of chemical literacy: A place for chemical reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 66(2). https://doi.org/10.1021/ed066p157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed066p157
Chang, R. (2010). Chemistry (Tenth ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Chasanah, N., Widodo, W., & Suprapto, N. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Literasi Sains Untuk Mendeskripsikan Profil Peserta Didik. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.2.474-483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.2.474-483
Cigdemoglu, C., & Geban, O. (2015). Improving students’ chemical literacy levels on thermochemical and thermodynamics concepts through a context-based approach. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00007f DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00007F
Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Wiston, Inc.
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601. 10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:63.0.CO;2-L DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
Dewi, C. A., Rahayu, S., Muntolib., Parlan. (2022). Pentingnya mengoptimalkan literasi kimia melalui pembelajaran barbasis isu-isu sosiosaintifik di abad ke-21. Proceeding Seminar Nasional. 348-359, https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/snipa/article/view/1371
Elviana. (2020). Analisis butir soal evaluasi pembelajaran Pendidikan agama islam menggunakan program anates. Jurnal Mudarrisuna. 10(2). 59-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/jm.v10i2.7839
Fahmina, S. S., Indriyanti, N. Y., Setyowati, W. A. E., Masykuri, M., & Yamtinah, S. (2019). Dimension of Chemical Literacy and its Influence in Chemistry Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012026
Fernandes, H.J.X. (1984). Evaluation of educational programs. Jakarta: National Education Planning Evaluation and Curriculum Development.
Fuadah, H., Rusilowati, A., & Hartono. (2017). Pengembangan alat evaluasi literasi sains untuk mengukur kemampuan literasi sains siswa sertema perpindahan kalor dalam kehidupan. Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/lik.v46i2.11350
Garvin, A. D., & Ebel, R. L. (1980). Essentials of educational measurement. Educational Researcher, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.2307/1175572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1175572
Guntur. (2014). Penilaian berbasis kinerja (performance-based assessment) pada pendidikan jasmani. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia. 10(1). 15-22.
Gusmizain,A. (2022). Karakteristik butir soal tes mata kuliah matriks & ruang vector mahasiswa matematika. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 13(2). 127-130. https://doi.org/10.21009/jep.v13i2.28328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/jep.v13i2.28328
Imnasari, M., Sudarmin., Sumarni, W. (2018). Analisis literasi kimia peserta didik melalui pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing bermuatan etnosains. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia. 12(2), 2201-221,
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JIPK/article/view/15480
Kemendikbud. (2017). Panduan Gerakan literasi nasional. Jakarta Timur
Lababa, D. (2018). Analisis butir soal dengan teori tes klasik: sebuah pengantar. Jurnal Ilmiah Iqra. 2(2). 29-37. 10.30984/jii.v2i2.538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30984/jii.v2i2.538
Looney, A., Cumming, J., Kleij, F. V. D., & Harris, K. (2017). Reconceptualizing the role of teachers as assessors: teacher assessment identity. Assessment in education principals, Policy & Practice. 25(2), 442-467. https://10.1080/0969594X.2016.1268090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1268090
MacNichol, K., (1960). Effects of varying order of item difficulty in an unspeeded verbal test. Unpublished manuscript, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ
Maradpi, D. (2012). Pengukuran penilaian & evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.
Mayasari, T., & Paidi. (2022). Analisis kemampuan literasi sains siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri di kota Yogyakarta mata Pelajaran biologi ditinjau dari kefavoritan sekolah. Jurnal Edukasi Biologi. 8(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/edubio.v8i2.18212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/edubio.v8i2.18212
Mehrens, W.A., & Lehmann, I.J. (1973). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Inc.
Mozeika, D., & Bilbokaite, R. (2010). Teaching and learning method for enhancing 15-16-year-old students’ knowledge as one of scientific literacy aspect in chemistry: Results based on research and approbation. The International Journal of Education Researchers, 3(1), 1-16, http://ijer.eab.org.tr/1/3/1_mozeika.pdf
National Research Council, (1996). Discipline-based education research, Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering, Washington DC.,
Nurcahyo, F. A. (2017). Aplikasi IRT dalam analisis aitem tes kognitif. Buletin Psikologi, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.25218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.25218
Nurhalimah, S., Hidayati, Y., Rosidi, I., & Hadi, W. P. Hubungan antara validitas item dengan daya pembeda dan tingkat kesukarann soal pilihan ganda pas. Jurnal Natural Science Educational Research, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.21107/nser.v4i3.8682 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/nser.v4i3.8682
OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 Results in Focus : Snapshot of performance in science, reading and mathematics. OECD Publishing Online.
OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 Results combined executive summaries volume I, II & III. PISA, OECD Publishing
Prastika, Y. D. (2021). Pengaruh validitas, reliabilitas dan tingkat kesukaran terhadap kualitas butir soal ekonomi menggunakan software anates di SMKN 2 bangkalan. STKIP PGRI Bangkalan
Pratiwi et al. (2019). Pembelajaran IPA abad 21 dengan literasi sains siswa. Jurnal Materi dan Pembalajaran Fisika. 9(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/jmpf.v9i1.31612
Purwati, H., Retnawati, H., Jailani, J., & Retnowati, T. H. (2021). Analisis karakteristik butir soal ujian nasional matematika SMP/MTs berdasarkan pendekatan teori tes klasik. Jurnal Sains Dan Edukasi Sains, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.24246/juses.v4i2p46-51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/juses.v4i2p46-51
Putri, R. K. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Literasi Sains Siswa Pada Topik Keanekaragaman Makhluk Hidup. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Biologi. 4(1), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.33369/diklabio.4.1.71-78 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/diklabio.4.1.71-78
Rahayu, S. (2017). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Tingkat Tinggi Siswa melalui Pembelajaran Kimia Berkonteks Socioscientific Issues (SSI) dan Nature of Science (NOS). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia Dan Pembelajarannya (SNKP).
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrument penelitian. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
Reynolds, C.R., Livingstone & Wilson. (2010). Measurement and assessment in education. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Rusilawati, A. (2018). Asesmen Literasi Sains: Analisis Karakteristik Instrumen dan Kemampuan Siswa Menggunakan Teori Tes Modern Rasch model. Prosiding Seminar Naional Fisika Universitas Riau. 3. 1-14. https://snf.fmipa.unri.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/0.-300B-2-15NI.pdf
Rohmad., & Sarah, S. (2021). Pengembangan instrument angket. Yogyakarta: Penerbit K-Media.
Satiawan, A. (2014). Simulation study of item validity testing and item discrimination index. Proceeding of International Conference on Electrical Engineering, 99-104. :10.11591/eecsi.1.355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/eecsi.v1.355
Setyawarno, D. (2018). Penggunaan aplikasi software iteman (item and test analysis) untuk analisis butir soal pilihan ganda berdasarkan teori tes klasik. Jurnal Ilmu Fisika dan Pembelajarannya. 2(2). 11-21. https://doi.org/10.19109/jifp.v1i1.866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19109/jifp.v1i1.866
Shwartz, Y., Ben-zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006b). The Use of Scientific Literacy Taxonomy for Assessing the Development of Chemical Literacy Among High School Students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203–225. 10.1039/B6RP90011A DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90011A
Tim Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan. (2019). Panduan penilaian kinerja (performance assessment). Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan: Jakarta.
Utami, S. H. A., Marwoto, P., & Sumarni, W. (2022). Analisis kemampuan literasi sains pada siswa sekolah dasar ditinjau dari aspek konten, proses, dan konteks sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i2.23802 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i2.23802
Wahyuni, A., & Yusmaita, E. (2020). Perancangan instrumen tes literasi kimia pada materi asam dan basa kelas XI SMA/MA. Edukimia, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.24036/ekj.v2.i3.a186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/ekj.v2.i3.a186
Widoyoko, E. P. (2018). Teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian pendidikan kimia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Windyariani, S., Setiono, S., & Sutisnawati, A. (2017). Pengembangan Model Asesmen Literasi Sains Berbasis Konteks Bagi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Berkemajuan Dan Menggembirakan, 2.
Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching dan Teacher Education. 58, 149-162. 10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010
Yasar, M. (2017). Comparison of item difficulty levels obtained as per two different methods. European Journal of Education Sciences. 4(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v4no3a4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v4no3a4
Zahro, I. F., Atika, a. R., Westhisi, S. M. (2019). Strategi pembelajaran literasi sains untuk anak usia dini. Jurnal Ilmiah Potensia. 4(2). https://doi.org/10.33369/jip.4.2.121-130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/jip.4.2.121-130
Zein, A., Fadillah, M., & Novianti, R. (2013). Hubungan antara validitas butir, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran dan daya pembeda soal ujian semester genap bidang studi biologi kelas XI SMA/MA negeri di kota padang tahun Pelajaran 2010/2011. Prosiding Semirata FMIPA Universitas Lampung
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Sri Nurfadillah Ningsih, Edi Istiyono, Widihastuti
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
