Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Explain Teachers' Adoption of Digital Technology in Business Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v57i2.74301Keywords:
TAM, Adoption of Digital Technology, Business Education TeacherAbstract
The use of technology eases and makes teaching learning process effective and efficient. Thus far, researches on technology acceptance in higher education has been widely conducted; however, only few has focused on vocational high school teachers, especially in the field of business. This survey research aims to analyze the influences of technology acceptance variables: Perceived of usefulness (PU) and Perceived of Ease of Use (PEU) towards two other acceptance variables: among vocational high school (SMK) teachers in the Business and Management field in Surakarta. The population of this research was all vocational high school teachers in the Business and Management field in Surakarta. At the end of the research, there were 172 responses obtained from the teachers involved. Partial Least Squares (PLS) on Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was used to test the research hypotheses. The empirical findings show that there are significant influences; particularly on PEU and PU, as well as PEU and PU on BI. Furthermore, BI is also proven to have a significant influence on AU. The findings are expected to provide deeper insights into the factors influencing technology adoption by teachers in business education. Moreover, the implication is foreseen to contribute on the development of more effective and efficient business education through the use of digital technology.
References
Acarli, D. S., & Sağlam, Y. (2015). Investigation of Pre-service Teachers’ Intentions to Use of Social Media in Teaching Activities within the Framework of Technology Acceptance Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 709–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.530.
Akbulut, H. İ., Tatlı, Z., & Altınışık, D. (2019). Changing Attitudes towards Educational Technology Usage in Classroom: Web 2.0 Tools. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2019.02.001.
Al-Malah, D. K. A. R., Jinah, H. H. K., & ALRikabi, H. T. S. (2020). Enhancement of educational services by using the internet of things applications for talent and intelligent schools. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 8(4), 2358–2366. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v8i4.1744.
Al Darayseh, A. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science teachers’ perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100132.
Alassafi, M. O. (2022). E-learning intention material using TAM: A case study. Materials Today: Proceedings, 61, 873–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.457.
Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266.
Asad, M. M., Hussain, N., Wadho, M., Khand, Z. H., & Churi, P. P. (2020). Integration of e-learning technologies for interactive teaching and learning process: an empirical study on higher education institutes of Pakistan. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(3), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2020-0103.
Bakir, N. (2015). An Exploration of Contemporary Realities of Technology and Teacher Education: Lessons Learned. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 31(3), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2015.1040930.
Budiman, H. (2017). Peran Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Dalam Pendidikan. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.24042/atjpi.v8i1.2095.
Chiu, M., & Lin, C. (2022). Developing supply chain open innovation capability: The mediating role of the knowledge creation process, governance mechanism and technology as a driver. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100264.
Drajati, N. A., & Putra, K. A. (2023). Exploring Students’ Perceptions of EFL Teachers’ TPACK Knowledge in Online Classroom Environment. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.2494.
Eksail, F. A. A., & Afari, E. (2020). Factors affecting trainee teachers’ intention to use technology: A structural equation modeling approach. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2681–2697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10086-2.
Fayolle, A., Verzat, C., & Wapshott, R. (2016). In quest of legitimacy: The theoretical and methodological foundations of entrepreneurship education research. International Small Business Journal, 34(7), 895–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242616649250.
Ferdira, B. G., Gulo, A. P. N., Nugroho, Y. I. D., & Andry, J. F. (2018). Analisis Perilaku Pengguna Aplikasi Mobile Mataharimall. Com Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurnal SITECH: Sistem Informasi Dan Teknologi, 1(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.24176/sitech.v1i2.2790.
Georgiou, D., Trikoili, A., & Kester, L. (2023). Rethinking determinants of primary school teachers’ technology acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers and Education Open, 4, 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100145.
Gibson, P. A., Stringer, K., Cotten, S. R., Simoni, Z., O’neal, L. J., & Howell-Moroney, M. (2014). Changing teachers, changing students? The impact of a teacher-focused intervention on students’ computer usage, attitudes, and anxiety. Computers & Education, 71, 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.002.
Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864.
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004.
Hanafi, H. (2021). The Antecedent of teachers’ intention to use e-learning during a pandemic: TAM approach. International Journal of Education and Learning, 3(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v3i3.315.
Hardianto, H., Sari, V. P., & Hidayat, H. (2022). Optimizing Teacher Self-Efficacy in Facing the New Normal: A Literature Review. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.2835.
Hartono, R., Judijanto, L., Napis, M. S. H., & Abda, M. I. (2023). Digital Learning Innovation in Indonesia. Journal of Technology Global, 1(1), 34–43. https://penaeducentre.com/index.php/JTeG/article/view/43/45.
Haswani, F. (2014). The role of technology in EFL classroom. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 1(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v1i2.1303.
Hidayatullah, M. T., Asbari, M., Ibrahim, M. I., & Faidz, A. H. H. (2023). Urgensi Aplikasi Teknologi dalam Pendidikan di Indonesia. Journal of Information Systems and Management (JISMA), 2(6), 70–73. https://doi.org/10.4444/jisma.v2i6.785.
Hur, J. W., Shannon, D., & Wolf, S. (2016). An investigation of relationships between internal and external factors affecting technology integration in classrooms. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 32(3), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1169959.
Koç, Ö., Yüksel, H. G., & Altun, E. (2021). Technology acceptance and usage behaviour of content and language integrated learning teachers in Turkey. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 4(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v4i2.4269.
Korucu, A. T. (2017). Teachers’ Technology Acceptance and Usage Situations and the Evaluation of Web Pedagogic Content Knowledge in Terms of Different Variations and the Determination of the Relationship between These. International Education Studies, 10(3), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n3p54.
Kusumadewi, A. N., Lubis, N. A., Prastiyo, R., & Tamara, D. (2021). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) In The Use of Online Learning Applications During The Covid-19 Pandemic For Parents of Elementary School Students. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(1), 272–292. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v2i1.120.
Lah, U., Lewis, J. R., & Šumak, B. (2020). Perceived Usability and the Modified Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(13), 1216–1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1727262.
Lewis, J. R., Utesch, B. S., & Maher, D. E. (2015). Measuring Perceived Usability: The SUS, UMUX-LITE, and AltUsability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(8), 496–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1064654.
Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Stoilova, M. (2023). The outcomes of gaining digital skills for young people’s lives and wellbeing: A systematic evidence review. New Media & Society, 25(5), 1176–1202. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211043189.
Loi, M., Castriotta, M., & Di Guardo, M. C. (2016). The theoretical foundations of entrepreneurship education: How co-citations are shaping the field. International Small Business Journal, 34(7), 948–971. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615602322.
Mailizar, M., Almanthari, A., & Maulina, S. (2021). Examining teachers’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in teaching of mathematics: An extended tam model. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30935/CEDTECH/9709.
Maruping, L. M., Bala, H., Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2017). Going beyond intention: Integrating behavioral expectation into the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23699.
Natasia, S. R., Wiranti, Y. T., & Parastika, A. (2021). Acceptance analysis of NUADU as e-learning platform using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach. Procedia Computer Science, 197, 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.168.
Ndebele, C., & Mbodila, M. (2022). Examining Technology Acceptance in Learning and Teaching at a Historically Disadvantaged University in South Africa through the Technology Acceptance Model. Education Sciences, 12(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010054.
Olasina, G. (2019). Human and social factors affecting the decision of students to accept e-learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(3), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1474233.
Önalan, O., & Kurt, G. (2020). Exploring Turkish EFL teachers’ perceptions of the factors affecting technology integration: A case study. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 626–646. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.759264.
Opoku, M. P., Elhoweris, H., Alhosani, N., Mustafa, A., Alkhateri, T., & Nketsia, W. (2023). Factors influencing the intention of trainee special education teachers to integrate assistive technology into teaching students with disabilities in the United Arab Emirates. Heliyon, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22736.
Pibriana, D. (2020). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) untuk Menganalisis Penerimaan Pengguna Terhadap Penggunaan Aplikasi Belanja Online XYZ. JATISI (Jurnal Teknik Informatika Dan Sistem Informasi), 7(3), 580–592. https://doi.org/10.35957/jatisi.v7i3.382.
Raja, R., & Nagasubramani, P. . (2018). Impact of Modern Technology. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(1), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1201/b12574-14.
Ranellucci, J., Rosenberg, J. M., & Poitras, E. G. (2020). Exploring pre-service teachers’ use of technology: The technology acceptance model and expectancy–value theory. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 810–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12459.
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guardia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the covid-19 crisis: refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y.
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2021). Balancing technology, pedagogy and the new normal: Post-pandemic challenges for higher education. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(3), 715–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2020). All the same or different? Revisiting measures of teachers’ technology acceptance. Computers & Education, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103656.
Scherer, R., & Teo, T. (2019). Unpacking teachers’ intentions to integrate technology: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 27, 90–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.03.001.
Septiyanti, M., Inderawati, R., & Vianty, M. (2020). Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) perception of English education students. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v8i2.2114.
Sinha, K. K. (2022). Role of modern technology in teaching and learning the English language in Indian educational institutions. Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS), 8(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijels.v8i2.4713.
Straker, L., Zabatiero, J., Danby, S., Thorpe, K., & Edwards, S. (2018). Conflicting Guidelines on Young Children’s Screen Time and Use of Digital Technology Create Policy and Practice Dilemmas. The Journal of Pediatrics, 202, 300–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.019.
Stratton, S. J. (2021). Population Research: Convenience Sampling Strategies. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 36(4), 373–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X21000649.
Suryani, L., & Murniyasih2, E. (2021). Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (Tam) Analysis of Acceptance of E-Learning Applications Using Technology Acceptance Model (Tam). Jurnal Elektro Luceat, 7(1).
Tyaningsih, A. R., Suryadi, S., & Rahmawati, D. (2021). Self-Efficacy, Teacher Leadership and Teacher Professionalism in Secondary School. Jurnal Iqra’: Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v6i2.1331.
Tyrer, S., & Heyman, B. (2016). Sampling in epidemiological research: issues, hazards and pitfalls. BJPsych Bulletin, 40(2), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.114.050203.
Venkatesh, V. (2000).Determinants of perceived ease of use:integrating control, intrinsic motivation , acceptance model. Inorganic Chemistry Communications,11(3),319–340.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. . (1996). A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–470.
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D., & Zhu, Y. (2023). Competing roles of intention and habit in predicting behavior: A comprehensive literature review, synthesis, and longitudinal field study. International Journal of Information Management, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102644.
Wong, G. K. (2015). Understanding technology acceptance in pre-service teachers of primary mathematics in Hong Kong. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(6), 713–735. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1890.
Zhou, L., Xue, S., & Li, R. (2022). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore Students’ Intention to Use an Online Education Platform at a University in China. SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221085259.
Zhou, T., Song, Y., & Zhou, P. (2022). Continued use intention of travel apps: from the perspective of control and motivation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(6), 703–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1916457.
Zogheib, B., Rabaa’i, A., Zogheib, S., & Elsaheli, A. (2015). University Student Perceptions of Technology Use in Mathematics Learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 417–438. https://doi.org/10.28945/2315.
Zulfitria, Ansharullah, & Fadhillah, R. (2020). Penggunaan Teknologi & Internet sebagai Media.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nur Rahmi Akbarini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
