Menelaah Konsep Emmanuel Levinas Tentang Home Sebagai Pusat Spasial dalam Proses Pemanusiaan
Examining Emmanuel Levinas' Concept of Home as a Spatial Center in The Humanization Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v7i1.62036Keywords:
Emmanuel Levinas, home, spatial center, humanizing processAbstract
This article discusses the concept of home in the philosophical thought of Emmanuel Levinas. Levinas has a rich background in philosophical thought, especially in the field of ethics. The purpose of this article is to examine and analyze Levinas’ concept to gain an understanding of the home as an ethical space that encourages relationships and responsibility between people. The philosophical analysis in this article uses the literature study method and concentrates on Levinas’s concepts found in the book ’Totality and Infinity’. Levinas reveals that home is a spatial center that inspires the process of humanization because it is a place for humans to get answers to all their hopes. According to Levinas, home is a space that has a close relationship with human existence. Home is not only a place to live or a place for ordinary activities, but also a special space with philosophical and ethical meanings. Home is a representation of life; a place to start and sustain life; a place to enjoy life; a place to determine the true existence of human beings. Levinas’ concept allows humans to work and shape everything they have in order to give birth to hospitality, openness to accept the ’Other’ in every encounter with the world outside their home. Levinas emphasizes that the concept of home forms the basis of ethical interaction that encourages the development of true humanity. Through in-depth analysis of the concept of home, it is found that home is not only a material object or physical place, but also refers to the process of forming ethical awareness of each individual in building relationships and responsibilities towards fellow humans and the environment. This concept can be used as a reference to understand humans and their ownership, and can be studied and examined in various contexts.
References
Adon, M. J., & Masut, V. R. (2022). Dasar Pelayanan Tenaga Medis bagi Pasien Covid-19 Sebagai Etika Tanggung Jawab Menurut Emmanuel Levinas. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 5(1), 53–67.
De Silva, W. (2010). Otto Friedrich Bollnow’s Concept of Human Space. A Critical Discussion on the Fundamentals of the Concepts of Space. Built-Environment Sri Lanka, 7(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.4038/besl.v7i2.1942.
Fawaid, A. (2013). Perjumpaan Etis dengan Wajah Yang-Lain: Membaca Karya Sastra dengan “Etika” Levinasian. Jurnal Poetika, I(2), 131–142.
Grace, D., Rongrean, F., & Pandor, P. (2023). Fenomena Kaunan dalam Masyarakat Toraja dari Perspektif Emmanuel Levinas. 6(2), 132–142.
Hasib, K. (2019). Manusia dan Kebahagiaan : Pandangan Filsafat Yunani dan Respon Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas. TASFIYAH: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 3(1), 21–40.
Kevin, A. (2021). Epifani Wajah di Tengah Krisis Relasi Refleksi Filosofis “Aku” dengan “Yang Lain” dalam Konsep Alteritas Emanuel Levinas. AGGIORNAMENTO: Jurnal Filsafat-Teologi Konstekstual, 2(1), 45–57.
Lechte, J. (2001). 50 Filsuf Kontemporer. Kanisius.
Levinas, E. (1985). Ethics and Infinity. Duquesne University Press.
Levinas, E. (1998). Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence (A. Lingis (ed.); 1st ed.). Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7906-3.
Levinas, E. (2011). Totality and Infinity (4th ed.). Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9342-6.
Molan, B. (2020). Relevansi Pemikiran Emanuel Levinas dalam Konteks Pandemi Covid-19. RESPONS, 25(02), 201–226.
Raharusun, J. H. (2021). Makna Kerja Menurut Karl Marx (Sebuah Kajian dari Perspektif Filsafat Manusia). MEDIA. Jurnal Filsafat dan Teolog, 2(1), 121–144.
Sahadewa, N. W., & Wahyudi, I. (2023). Pengembangan Metode Penelitian Kefilsafatan Kritis Konstruktif. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 6(2), 268–275.
Selatang, F. (2020). Memahami Manusia dan Alam dalam Terang Filsafat Proses Alfred North Whitehead dan Relevansinya Bagi Teologi. SAPA - Jurnal Kateketik Dan Pastoral, 5(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.53544/sapa.v5i1.126
Sendana, F. I. (2021). Lingkungan Sebagai “Sang Liyan” Upaya Pelestarian Lingkungan Ditinjau Dari Konsep “ Sang Liyan .” SOPHIA: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristen, 2(2), 62–79.
Setyono, J. W. (2023). Implikasi Pragmatisme dalam Kehidupan Manusia Masa Kini : Studi Literatur. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 6(2), 220–223.
Sobon, K. (2018). Konsep Tanggung Jawab. Jurnal Filsafat, 28(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.31281.
Soebagio, E. (2020). Humanisme bagi Sesama : Menyikap Akar Kekerasan dalam Relasi Antarmanusia dan Etika Tanggung Jawab Menurut Emmanuel Levinas. Seri Filsafat & Teologi, 20(29), 137–157.
Sudarminta, J. (2013). Mengulik Pemikiran Alfred N. Whitehead Tentang Kebudayaan. Diskursus - Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi Stf Driyarkara, 12(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.36383/diskursus.v12i1.117.
Wahyudin. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka dan Studi Lapangan. Pre-Print Digital Library UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 6(1), 1–6.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia Undiksha is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
